碾压混凝土高拱坝坝肩稳定及坝体开裂静动力分析

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.12.026

›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3541-3547.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.12.026

碾压混凝土高拱坝坝肩稳定及坝体开裂静动力分析

肖珍珍¹，王登银²，陈建叶¹，杨宝全¹，张林¹

1.四川大学水利水电学院水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室，四川成都 610065； 2.中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司，浙江杭州 310014

收稿日期:2015-05-20 出版日期:2015-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
通讯作者: 陈建叶，女，1978年生，博士，副教授，主要从事水工结构工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: jianyechen@163.com E-mail:xiaozhenzhen_scu@163.com
作者简介:肖珍珍，女，1993年生，硕士研究生，主要从事水工结构工程及其基础工程方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 51379139，No. 51409179）。

Static and dynamic analyses of abutment stability and dam cracking of a roller-compacted concrete high-arch dam

XIAO Zhen-zhen¹, WANG Deng-yin², CHEN Jian-ye¹, YANG Bao-quan¹, ZHANG Lin¹

1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Development and Protection, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 2. PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China

Received:2015-05-20 Online:2015-12-11 Published:2018-06-14
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51379139 and 51409179).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 强震区高拱坝抗震问题的研究十分重要，高拱坝静力稳定研究和极限抗震能力复核，是确保地震后不发生库水失控下泄的关键课题之一。采用物理模型试验与数值计算的方法，根据汶川震后新核定参数，并考虑降强因素的影响，对沙牌碾压混凝土拱坝进行静动力分析和复核。通过三维地质力学模型综合法静力破坏试验，研究拱坝坝肩在正常荷载作用下的稳定安全性，得到沙牌拱坝坝肩综合稳定安全系数为3.76，建议对两坝肩开裂较严重区域进行加固处理。在此基础上，基于反应谱理论进行三维有限元动力分析，将应力成果导入开发程序由Drucker-Prager（D-P）和Mohr-Coulomb（M-C）准则对加固后的沙牌拱坝进行动力复核计算，并研究大坝的开裂情况和极限抗震能力，计算结果表明，沙牌拱坝的整体抗震稳定性能良好，仅在万年一遇地震工况下发生坝肩浅表层失稳。研究成果表明，沙牌拱坝坝肩稳定性较高、坝肩加固效果良好，从而在“5.12”汶川地震中表现出超强的整体稳定性和抗震能力，其全面开展的研究工作和采取的工程措施可供国内强震区同类型拱坝工程建设及运行借鉴和参考。

关键词: 碾压混凝土拱坝, 地质力学模型试验, 三维动力有限元分析, 坝肩稳定, 坝体开裂

Abstract: The seismic response of high-arch dam in meizoseismal area is of great importance. Analysis of static stability and ultimate seismic resistance is one of the crucial issues to ensure the reservoir safety during earthquakes. By using the verified parameters after the Wenchuan Earthquake and considering the influence of strength reduction, the static and dynamic analysis for Shapai roller-compacted concrete arch dam are performed based on physical model tests and numerical calculation. Through the 3D static geomechanical model destruction test by comprehensive method, the stability of arch dam abutment under the normal load is studied. The comprehensive stability safety coefficient is determined as 3.76, and the areas destroyed seriously are suggested to be reinforced. Based on this, the 3D dynamic finite element analysis is conducted based on the method of superposition response spectrum. The calculated stresses are used to analyze the dynamic response of Shapai arch dam after reinforcement, based on the Drucker-Prager criterion and Mohr-Coulomb criterion. The fracture situation of dam and ultimate seismic resistance are discussed. The calculation results show that the seismic resistance of Shapai arch dam is good, only the instability of shallow surface will occur under the condition of earthquake in ten thousand years. The results also show that the abutment stability and reinforcement effect of Shapai arch dam is favorable. Thus Shapai arch dam performed very well with regard to overall stability and seismic resistance in "5.12" Wenchuan Earthquake. The comprehensive researches and these engineering treatment measures can provide valuable reference for other similar projects in meizoseismal area.

Key words: roller-compacted concrete arch dam, geomechanical model test, three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis, abutment stability, dam cracking

中图分类号:

TU 476

肖珍珍，王登银，陈建叶，杨宝全，张林，. 碾压混凝土高拱坝坝肩稳定及坝体开裂静动力分析[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3541-3547.

XIAO Zhen-zhen , WANG Deng-yin , CHEN Jian-ye , YANG Bao-quan , ZHANG Lin，. Static and dynamic analyses of abutment stability and dam cracking of a roller-compacted concrete high-arch dam[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3541-3547.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[2]	高强，张强勇，张绪涛，向文，. 深部洞室开挖卸荷分区破裂机制的动力分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3181-3194.
[3]	罗先启，毕金锋. 地质力学磁力模型试验原理及其在工程中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 367-374.
[4]	宋子亨，刘耀儒，杨强，徐建荣，何明杰，张伟狄，. 高拱坝基础不对称性及其加固效果研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 507-516.
[5]	王凯，李术才，张庆松，张霄，李利平，张乾青，刘聪. 流-固耦合模型试验用的新型相似材料研制及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2521-2533.
[6]	曾海艳，张建海，刘喜康，王震洲，赵文光，王仁坤，. 基于超载法的拱坝坝肩地震动力稳定性方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1118-1126.
[7]	李浪，王明洋，范鹏贤，程怡豪，李治中，蒋海明. 深地下工程模型试验加卸载装置的研制[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 297-304.
[8]	沈辉，罗先启，郑安兴，毕金锋，翁永红，. 拱坝联合坝肩岩体三维计算模型构建[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1455-1460.
[9]	杨庚鑫，马德萍，张林，陈媛，董建华 , . 地质力学模型试验中软弱结构面内埋式位移系统的研制与应用[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 901-907.
[10]	段抗，张强勇，朱鸿鹄，向文，蔡兵，许孝滨 . 光纤位移传感器在盐岩地下储气库群模型试验中的应用[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 471-476.
[11]	段抗，张强勇，向文，蔡兵，许孝滨，贾超，刘健 . 盐岩地下储气库注采气套管运行安全的物理模型试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1605-1612.
[12]	王汉鹏，王琦，李海燕，李为腾，张敦福 . 模型试验柔性均布压力加载系统研制及其应用[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1945-1950.
[13]	张乾兵，朱维申，李勇，孙林锋，张磊. 洞群模型试验中微型多点位移计的设计及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 623-628.
[14]	朱维申，郑文华，朱鸿鹄，张乾兵，殷建华. 棒式光纤传感器在地下洞群模型试验中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3342-3347.
[15]	张强勇，刘德军，贾超，沈鑫，刘健，段抗. 盐岩油气储库介质地质力学模型相似材料的研制[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3581-3586.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

碾压混凝土高拱坝坝肩稳定及坝体开裂静动力分析

Static and dynamic analyses of abutment stability and dam cracking of a roller-compacted concrete high-arch dam

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10