›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 45-52.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0067

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高速铁路小变形下陡坡地基路肩桩板墙力学响应

谢 涛1, 2,罗 强1, 2,周 成3,张 良1, 2,蒋良潍1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031; 3. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-08 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 罗强,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事路基工程及土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: LQrock@swjtu.cn E-mail:1535009557@qq.com
  • 作者简介:谢涛,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事土力学及路基工程方面的学习与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划) (No. 2013CB036204);中国中铁股份有限公司科研重点项目 (03-2010)。

Mechanical response of shoulder sheet-pile wall under strictly restricted deformation condition in steep ground along a high-speed railway

XIE Tao1, 2, LUO Qiang1, 2, ZHOU Cheng3, ZHANG Liang1, 2, JIANG Liang-wei1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3.China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2016-01-08 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2013CB036204) and the Key Program of China Railway Group Limited (03-2010).

摘要: 掌握高速铁路陡坡地基条件下路肩桩板墙力学特性是路堤侧向变形控制的关键。以贵广高速铁路某陡坡地基路肩桩板墙为试验工点,对墙背土压力、桩身内力与变形进行了900余天现场长期观测,讨论了墙后路堤分层填筑引起的墙土侧向变形形态差异及机械碾压残余应力对土压力分布的影响。结果表明:适应高速铁路小变形要求的强约束、深锚固路肩桩板墙能有效控制陡坡地基路堤侧向变形,桩体仅呈0.94‰的近似刚性转动,填筑完成后变形约占30%,且1.0~1.5 a趋于稳定;经碾压密实的墙后粗粒土填料,即使在小变形下依然能达到主动土压力状态;分层填筑引起墙后填土侧向变形呈现的“上小下大”分布形态与墙体位移相反,是墙背土压力呈现出中部大、两端小抛物线分布模式的重要因素;基于适筋梁受力状态及平截面假定,分别结合实测钢筋应力与混凝土应变换算得到的桩身弯矩具有良好的一致性,与极限地基反力法的理论计算吻合。

关键词: 高速铁路, 陡坡地基, 路肩桩板墙, 力学响应, 现场测试

Abstract: It is key to grasp mechanical response of shoulder sheet-pile wall in steep ground along a high-speed railway for control of lateral deformation of embankment. In this study, the sheet-pile walls in steep ground along Guiyang-Guangzhou high-speed railway were selected as monitored objects. Long-term observations for the earth pressure behind the wall, the internal force and deformation of the pile were made for more than 900 days. The layered filling-induced differential deformation between sheet pile walls was intensively discussed, and the effect of roller compaction-induced residual stress on distribution of earth pressure was discussed as well. The results indicate that the lateral deformation of embankment is effectively limited by sheet-pile walls. The lateral deformation of the pile top is about 0.94‰ height of the wall and tends to be stable in 1?1.5 years later, this is about 30% of the total displacement after embankment is filled. The roller-compacted coarse-granular filler behind the wall can still reach active earth pressure state even in small lateral deformation. The lateral deformation of fills caused by the layered filling presents a shape of small at top and large at bottom and is opposite with the displacement distribution of sheet-pile wall. The lateral deformation of fills is the main factor for parabolic distribution of earth pressure behind the wall. The recommended bending moment formula about pile according to concrete stress and steel bar strain in field test is consistent with theoretical calculation value.

Key words: high-speed railway, steep ground, shoulder sheet-pile wall, mechanical response, field test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2] 朱才辉, 兰开江, 段宇, 贺红, . 西安地铁“先隧后井”法横通道施工控制技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 379-386.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 蒋中明, 李鹏, 赵海斌, 冯树荣, 唐栋, . 压气储能浅埋地下储气库性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 235-241.
[5] 翁永红, 张练, 徐唐锦, 黄书岭, 丁秀丽, . 高水头下大型导流洞新型堵头-围 岩相互作用规律与安全评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 242-252.
[6] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[7] 宋宏芳, 岳祖润, 李佰林, 张松, . 季节冻土区高速铁路防冻胀路基保温强化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4041-4048.
[8] 张传庆,高 阳,刘 宁,周 辉,冯夏庭, . 深埋隧洞力学响应监测与测试设计的思考[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2626-2631.
[9] 邱明明 ,杨 啸 ,杨果林 ,房以河,. 云桂高速铁路新型全封闭路堑基床动响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 537-544.
[10] 蒋建清 ,杨果林,. 格宾网加筋红层软岩土石混填路堤力学行为的现场测试与数值模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 156-165.
[11] 邓 鹏 ,郭 林 ,蔡袁强 ,王 军,. 循环荷载下考虑主应力旋转的软土力学响应研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 148-156.
[12] 姜领发 ,熊署丹 ,陈善雄 ,许锡昌,. 列车荷载作用下高铁路基速度传递规律模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 265-269.
[13] 薛富春 ,张建民 ,  . 移动荷载下高铁路基段振动加速度频谱衰减特性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 445-451.
[14] 邓宗伟 ,彭文春 ,高乾丰 ,董 辉 ,朱志祥,. 风力机扩展基础基底压力测试与平面度分析[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2659-2664.
[15] 梁 鑫 ,程谦恭 ,陈建明 ,李良广,. 采空区上方高速铁路桥梁群桩基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1865-1876.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!