›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 383-389.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.010

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载作用下竖向排水板加固软黏土的孔隙水压力累积特性研究

倪 静1,朱 颖1,陈有亮1,杜 曦1,Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn2   

  1. 1.上海理工大学 土木工程系,上海 200093;2.澳大利亚卧龙岗大学 土木工程系,澳大利亚 新南威尔士州 2522
  • 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:倪静,女,1983年,博士,讲师,主要从事交通荷载作用下软黏土力学性能方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    上海市科学技术委员会“扬帆计划”课题项目(No. 15YF1408200);上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(No. 14YZ081);教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金。

Cumulative pore water pressure behaviour of soft clays installed with prefabricated vertical drains under cyclic loads

NI Jing1, ZHU Ying1, CHEN You-liang1, DU Xi1, RUJIKIATKAMJORN Cholachat2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
  • Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by Yangfan Project of Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality(15YF1408200), the Innovative Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission(14YZ081) and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of Ministry of Education.

摘要: 采用大型动三轴试验仪进行重塑高岭土试样的循环三轴试验,试样直径为300 mm,高度为600 mm。圆柱体试样中心放置了一块竖向排水板,在循环加载试验进行时和结束后都可进行径向排水。试验结果验证了径向排水可以有效地消散循环荷载引起的孔隙水压力。通过结合径向固结理论与不排水循环加载土体模型,提出了一个循环荷载作用下径向固结模型,用来描述在允许径向排水的情况下软黏土在循环荷载作用下的孔压累积特性。模型中考虑了应力历史和孔隙水压力消散对孔隙水压力生成的影响,并用大型循环三轴试验结果进行验证。研究发现,当施加较大循环荷载时,径向排水减缓了孔隙水压力累积到临界值的速率,因而土体在破坏前可以经历更多次的循环荷载;当施加中等循环荷载时,径向排水可有效阻止孔隙水压力增长至临界值。除此之外,还研究了加载间歇期对孔压累积特性的影响,结果显示3组循环加载结束后,累积孔隙水压力开始减小,表明之后更多的循环加载并不会引起孔隙水压力的累积增长。

关键词: 竖向排水板, 孔隙水压力, 循环荷载, 软黏土, 固结

Abstract: Large-scale cyclic triaxial tests are conducted on remoulded kaolin specimens with 300 mm diameter and 600 mm height. To achieve radial drainage during and after the cyclic tests, a single prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) is installed in the centre of the soil cylinder. The test results verify that radial drainage can effectively dissipate the pore water pressure induced by cyclic loads. A radial consolidation model under cyclic loading is proposed to capture the behavior of soft clays subjected to cyclic loading when radial drainage is allowed during the loading and rest periods. It is achieved by combining radial consolidation theory with an undrained cyclic loading model. The effects of the stress history and dissipation of pore water pressure on the generation of pore water pressure are considered in the proposed model, which is verified by large-scale cyclic triaxial tests. It is found that for a high cyclic stress load, the radial drainage decreases the cumulative rate of pore water pressure up to the critical value, so the soil could undergo more loading cycles prior to failure. With a moderate cyclic stress load, the radial drainage prevents the pore water pressure from accumulating to the critical value. Furthermore, the effect of rest period on the generation of pore water pressure is investigated. It is indicated that the cumulative pore water pressure begins to decrease after three sets of cyclic loading, showing that no substantial pore water pressure will be observed if more sets of cyclic loading are applied.

Key words: prefabricated vertical drains (PVD), pore water pressure, cyclic loads, soft clays, consolidation 2015-03-26

中图分类号: 

  • TU 442

[1] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[2] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[3] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[4] 李红坡, 梅国雄, 肖涛, 陈征. 涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1560-1566.
[5] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[6] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[7] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[8] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[9] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[10] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[11] 李宗泽, 姜德义, 范金洋, 陈 结, 刘 伟, 吴 斐, 杜 超, 康燕飞. 盐岩三轴间隔疲劳特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
[12] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[13] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[14] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[15] 郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!