›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 592-600.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.033

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于离散元的边坡矢量和稳定分析方法研究

沈华章,郭明伟,王水林,葛修润   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-05 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:沈华章,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事应变软化和边坡稳定性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51179185,No. 41472289,No. 41302236);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No. 2014CB047100)。

Vector sum method for slope stability analysis based on discrete elements

SHEN Hua-zhang, GUO Ming-wei, WANG Shui-lin, GE Xiu-run   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2015-09-05 Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51179185, 41472289 and 41302236) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB047100).

摘要: 基于离散元方法对获取的块体单元、节理的应力场处理后得到坡体整体应力场,结合矢量和法安全系数的定义提出了一种边坡稳定性分析方法即VSM-UDEC法。首先通过滑块试验验证了多种情况下UDEC接触应力计算和单元应力的精确性,结果表明,UDEC接触应力和块体单元应力的精确程度很高(接触应力相对误差基本低于0.2%),能够满足矢量和安全系数计算要求。采用VSM-UDEC法分别对直线型滑面和圆弧型滑面算例进行了分析,并与相应的理论解和严格极限平衡法(Morgenstern-Price法)进行了对比。结果表明,对于直线型滑面VSM-UDEC法安全系数与理论解几乎相同,而对于圆弧型滑面该方法与极限平衡法结果基本一致。最后将VSM-UDEC法运用到锦屏I级水电站左岸边坡工程实例中,结果表明,假设块体为刚体时VSM-UDEC法安全系数与极限平衡法(Sarma法、Morgenstern-Price法)结果吻合较好,此外,VSM-UDEC法能够考虑坡体内结构面对稳定性的影响,较极限平衡法更能反映边坡的变形分布情况。鉴于UDEC在模拟边坡破坏方面优点较多且矢量和法安全系数物理意义明确,VSM-UDEC法有望在边坡稳定性分析中有较好的应用前景。

关键词: 矢量和法, 离散元法, 安全系数, 边坡稳定性

Abstract: Based on the whole slope stress field obtained from block element and the joint stress field calculated by distinct element method, combining with the definition of vector sum method (VSM), a new slope stability analysis method is proposed, namely VSM-universal distinct element code (VSM-UDEC) method. Firstly, the accuracy of contact stress and element stress calculated by UDEC under various conditions is verified by the slider test. It is shown that the contact stress and element stress fields have high precision (i.e., the relative error of contact stress is less than 0.2%), which satisfies the condition of safety factor calculation. Numerical simulations of a linear sliding surface and a circular sliding surface are analyzed by the VSM-UDEC method. Numerical results are compared with the solutions by the corresponding theory and the rigorous limit equilibrium method (Morgenstern-Price method). It is indicated that the safety factor obtained by the VSM-UDEC method is almost identical with that by the theoretical solution in the case of linear sliding surface, and is consistent with that by the limit equilibrium method in the case of circular sliding surface. Finally, the VSM-UDEC method is applied to analyze the stability of the left bank slope of the Jinping-I Hydropower Station. The results demonstrate that the safety factor by the VSM-UDEC method is good agreement with that by the limit equilibrium methods (Sarma method, Morgenstern-Price method) when blocks are regarded as rigid. Moreover, the VSM-UDEC method can be considered as the effect of the structural surface in the slope body on the slope stability, and thus it has more advantages than the limit equilibrium method to reflect the actual stability and deformation distribution situation of the slope. UDEC software has good applications of simulating slope failure process and VSM has the clear physical significance of safety factor, and therefore, the VSM-UDEC method may have good prospects of applications in the slope stability analysis.

Key words: vector sum method, distinct element method, safety factor, slope stability

中图分类号: 

  • O 241

[1] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[2] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[3] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[4] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[5] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[6] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[7] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[8] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[9] 王蕴嘉, 宋二祥. 堆石料颗粒形状对堆积密度及强度影响的 离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2416-2426.
[10] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[11] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[12] 夏侯云山, 张抒, 唐辉明, 刘晓, 吴琼, . 考虑参数空间变异结构的结构化交叉约束 随机场模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4935-4945.
[13] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[14] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[15] 申海萌, 李 琦, 李霞颖, 马建力, . 川南龙马溪组页岩不同应力条件下脆性破坏特征室内实验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 254-262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!