›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 529-536.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0333

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土地基和粉质黏土地基基坑悬臂开挖离心模型试验

李连祥1, 2,符庆宏3,黄佳佳1, 2   

  1. 1. 山东大学 基坑与深基础工程技术研究中心,山东 济南 250061; 2. 山东大学 土建与水利学院,山东 济南 250061;3. 东南大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 210096
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-14 出版日期:2018-02-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:李连祥,男,1966年生,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土力学及岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    山东省优秀中青年科学家科研基金项目(No. BS2013SF024);济南市科技计划项目(No. 201201145)

Centrifuge model tests on cantilever foundation pit engineering in sand ground and silty clay ground

LI Lian-xiang1, 2, FU Qing-hong3, HUANG Jia-jia1, 2   

  1. 1. Foundation Pit and Deep Foundation Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 3. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China
  • Received:2016-04-14 Online:2018-02-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Promotive Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province (BS2013SF024) and the Fund for Science and Technology of Jinan City (201201145).

摘要: 分别开展砂土和粉质黏土两种典型土质条件下基坑悬臂式开挖离心模型试验,详细叙述试验过程中所要解决的关键问题,并提出合理的解决方案。通过对比分析两组试验结果,得到以下结论:非饱和土地基制备中参数控制困难,分层夯实法有待进一步改进,而砂雨法制备的砂土地基参数可控性更好;两组试验的结果有差异,砂土地基试验所呈现的土压力、地基变形、支护弯矩的变化规律更好,因此,岩土离心试验可适当考虑以砂土代替非饱和土;对于采用悬臂式支护结构的基坑,开挖引起的地表沉降曲线在砂土中呈指数型,而在粉质黏土中呈直线型;开挖引起的粉质黏土地基土体位移范围较砂土地基更大;开挖引起的砂土中挡墙弯矩较粉质黏土更大,砂土和粉质黏土中最大弯矩位置都随开挖逐渐下移;在砂土试验中开挖引起主动区土压力各处均减小,而在粉质黏土试验中开挖引起土压力在挡墙底有增大趋势。该基坑工程离心模型试验过程及数据处理方法可为进一步试验提供参考。

关键词: 离心模型试验, 基坑工程, 砂土地基, 粉质黏土地基, 悬臂式支护结构

Abstract: Two centrifuge model tests on foundation pit engineering with cantilever retaining wall in sand and silty clay ground are carried out respectively. Test procedures and some feasible solutions to the key problems in the tests are introduced, and results of the two tests are listed and compared in this paper. It can be summarized that the preparation of unsaturated soil ground is difficult because it is hard to control parameters of remolded soil. Therefore, stratified compaction method needs to be improved. In contrast, sand ground prepared by sand-rain method is easier to control parameters.Evolution of soil pressure, foundation deformation, and bending moment in the sand ground test is better than that in the silty clay ground test. Therefore, geotechnical centrifuge model tests in unsaturated soil ground can be replaced by the tests in sand ground appropriately. In foundation pit engineering with cantilever supporting structures, the induced surface settlement curve is an exponential pattern in sand ground but a linear pattern in silty clay ground according to test results, and the induced ground deformation range is larger in silty ground than that in sand ground. The induced bending moment of the retaining wall is larger in sand ground than that in silty ground, and the positions of the maximum bending moment for both grounds move down during the excavations. In sand ground, soil excavation causes decrease of the earth pressure behind the retaining wall, while in silty clay ground, there is an increase at the bottom of the wall. The complete test procedures and data processing methods presented in this study provide technical premises and guidance for further tests.

Key words: centrifuge model tests, foundation pit engineering, sand ground, silty clay ground, cantilever retaining structure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441

[1] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[2] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[3] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[4] 詹良通, 胡英涛, 刘小川, 陈捷, 王瀚霖, 朱斌, 陈云敏. 非饱和黄土地基降雨入渗离心模型试验 及多物理量联合监测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2478-2486.
[5] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[6] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[7] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 王 珣, 黄昊威, 黄 哲, 王智猛, . 面板对加筋土挡墙影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[8] 李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张 彬, 张 嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究 采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
[9] 李 林, 李镜培, 孙德安, 龚卫兵, . 考虑沉桩效应的群桩非线性荷载-沉降解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 668-677.
[10] 梁 波, 厉彦君, 凌学鹏, 赵宁雨, 张青松, . 离心模型试验中微型土压力盒土压力测定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 818-826.
[11] 周和祥, 马建林, 张凯, 罗朝洋, 杨柏, . 沉井下沉阻力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3969-3976.
[12] 陈建峰,田 丹,柳军修,. 刚/柔性组合墙面加筋土挡墙内部破坏机制[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2353-2360.
[13] 张玉伟,谢永利,翁木生,. 非对称基坑开挖对下卧地铁隧道影响的离心试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2555-2562.
[14] 刘永权,刘新荣,谢应坤,余 瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[15] 李 波,肖先波,徐唐锦,周 嵩,. 泥皮存在时防渗墙与复合土工膜联接型式模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1761-1766.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!