›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1109-1117.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.025

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土钉墙+排桩在明挖隧道深基坑支护中的几个问题

王建华1, 2,李江腾3,廖 峻1, 2   

  1. 1. 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司 公路隧道建设技术国家工程实验室,重庆 400067;2. 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司 隧道建设与养护技术交通行业重点实验室,重庆 400067;3. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-14 出版日期:2016-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王建华,男,1978年生,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的科研和设计工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51374246);湖南省科技计划项目(No. 2013FJ6002);重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目(No. cstc2014jcyjA30020)。

Several issues on the soil nailing wall combined with row piles in bracing the deep foundation pits of open cut tunnel

WANG Jian-hua1, 2,LI Jiang-teng3,LIAO Jun1, 2   

  1. 1. National Engineering Laboratory for Highway and Tunnel Construction Technology, China Merchants Chongqing Communications Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Communications of Tunnel Construction & Maintenance Technology, China Merchants Chongqing Communications Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China; 3. School of Resources & Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
  • Received:2015-09-14 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51374246), Programs for Science and Technology of Hunan(Grant No. 2013FJ6002) and the Basic and Frontier Research Projects of Chongqing (cstc2014jcyjA30020).

摘要: 就当前土钉墙+排桩在明挖隧道深基坑支护中的几个问题,开展了有针对性的研究。采用理论分析和数值计算方法,结合工程实例,深入探讨了土钉墙坡比i,排桩桩径-间距(D-S),以及设有内支撑时,桩-撑相对刚度等参数的选取原则。结果表明:(1)i越小,土钉墙越稳定,但排桩弯矩、水平位移越大。在土钉墙自身滑动稳定前提下,i宜取大值。(2)D-S越大,排桩水平位移越小,排桩混凝土、钢筋量越少,造价越低,但桩间土的防护越困难。在工程地质好、地下水位低的情况下取大桩径、大间距,反之取小值。(3)弱桩强撑的支护效果好,但对施工干扰大;强桩(非悬臂)弱撑造价低。选择桩-撑的相对刚度需从工程地质、周边环境要求、工期、造价等因素综合考虑,方能达到安全可靠,经济合理的目的。

关键词: 明挖隧道, 深基坑, 土钉墙, 排桩, 内支撑

Abstract: Targeted research is performed on several problems about the application of the soil nailing wall combined with row piles in tunnel deep foundation pit support. Based on the theoretical and numerical analysis of engineering examples, the selection principle are proposed for the slope ratio i of soil nailing wall, the diameter-separation distance of the row pile as well as the relative stiffness between row pile and inner support while the inner support is applied. It is shown that 1) the smaller the value of i , the more stable the soil nailing wall, but the larger the moment and the displacement on the row pile are. The value of i should take a small value when the sliding stability of the soil nailing wall is fulfilled. 2) The larger the diameter and space between the piles, the smaller the horizontal displacement of the row pile, so that less concrete and steel rebar is required, resulting in a more cost-effective design, though the protection for the soil between piles will be more difficult. Hence, the diameter and the space between the pile should assume larger values when the engineering geological conditions is good and the water level is low, and vice versa. 3) Supporting effect of weak pile with strong support is better, but the construction interference for the surroundings is larger, while the cost of the strong pile (non-cantilever) with weak support is less. To achieve the purpose of safety and reliability and economical efficiency, it is necessary to consider engineering geological conditions, surrounding environment requirements, construction period, cost, and so on, in selecting the relative stiffness of the pile need.

Key words: open cut tunnel, deep foundation pit, soil nailing wall, row piles, inner support

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[2] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[3] 刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及 邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[4] 刘维宁, 姜博龙, 马蒙, 高健, . 周期性排桩设计频段隔振原理性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4138-4148.
[5] 李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[6] 尹志强,佘成学,姚海林,卢 正,骆行文,. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[7] 刘成禹,郑智享,. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[8] 周 勇,朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
[9] 孟庆娟,石志飞,. 基于周期理论和COMSOL PDE的排桩减振特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4251-4260.
[10] 贾金青,高军程,涂兵雄,张 磊,王海涛,高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[11] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[12] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[13] 杨光华,黄忠铭,姜 燕,徐传堡,乔有梁,陈富强, . 深基坑支护双排桩计算模型的改进[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 1-15.
[14] 周 勇,王正振, . 土钉墙内部稳定性分析方法改进[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 356-362.
[15] 庄海洋,张艳书,薛栩超,徐 烨,. 深软场地地铁狭长深基坑变形特征实测与已有统计结果的对比分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!