›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 675-682.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0474

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑滑坡渐进破坏的改进简布条分法

王 振1,叶晓明2,刘永新3   

  1. 1. 中兵勘察设计研究院有限公司,北京 100053;2. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 3. 重庆市涪陵城市建设投资集团有限公司,重庆 400045
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-04 出版日期:2018-02-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:王振,男,1990年生,硕士,主要进行岩体稳定性及防灾减灾工程研究及设计工作。

Improved Janbu slices method considering progressive destruction in landslide

WANG Zhen1, YE Xiao-ming2, LIU Yong-xin3   

  1. 1. China Ordnance Industry Survey and Geotechnical Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100053, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. Fuling City Construction Investment Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400045, China
  • Received:2016-05-04 Online:2018-02-10 Published:2018-06-06

摘要: 为考虑位移因素对于滑坡渐进性发育的影响,基于简布条分法基本原理,提出一个新的能够考虑滑带土抗剪能力与剪切位移关系的滑坡稳定性简化评价方法。该方法从以下两个方面对简布条分法进行了改进:(1)将滑动面剪应力-剪切位移本构模型与沿滑动面的剪切位移模型相结合,以考虑滑坡随着变形发展渐进破坏的过程;(2)提出局部安全系数的概念并对整体安全系数进行重新定义,物理意义更加明确。推导了该方法的计算公式,给出了其迭代计算思路,并编制Matlab计算程序。通过计算实例表明,应变软化边坡的安全系数不仅取决于土的抗剪强度指标,还与其剪应力-剪切位移关系密切相关,基于峰值强度的极限平衡条分法应用于实际工程是偏于危险的。同时该方法还可以有效地模拟边坡从开始破坏到最终滑动面贯通的发育过程,实现了坡体位移与安全系数之间一一对应的定量关系,进而实现边坡的稳定性的预测预报。

关键词: 位移, 滑坡, 渐进性, 应变软化, 安全系数

Abstract: To consider the impact of displacement factor on the progressive development of landslide, a modified Janbu slices method considering the relationship between shear stress and shear displacement of sliding face was presented to evaluate the stability of a landslide. The modified Janbu slices method is improved in the following two aspects: firstly, combined the constitutive shear stress-strain model and shear displacement model along the slide face to simulate the progressive failure process of landslide with deformation development; secondly, the overall safety factor was redefined using concept of partial safety factor with clearer physical meaning. The formula of the simplified method was derived and implemented by Matlab code. An example of simulation shows that the stability factor for slope with strain-softening behavior depends on the strength parameters, and also on the shear stress-shear displacement relationship of slip zone soil. It is unsafe for the limit equilibrium method to be applied to practical engineering, This method can also effectively simulate the development process from the beginning towards the entire sliding face failure of slope. The simulation realizes the quantitative correspondence relationship between displacement and safety factor, and can be used to predict the long-term stability of slope.

Key words: displacement, landslide, progressive property, strain-softening, safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432

[1] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[2] 罗刚, 张辉傲, 马国涛, 周海文, 胡卸文, 王文健, 王文沛, . 高速岩质滑坡滑面滑动摩擦特性研究——以王山 抓口寺滑坡为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2441-2452.
[3] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[4] 王立安, 赵建昌, 余云燕, . 瑞利波在非均匀饱和地基中的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[5] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[6] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[7] 黄福云, 陈汉伦, 董锐, 单玉麟. 水平低周往复位移下单桩-土相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1625-1634.
[8] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[9] 田抒平, 高盟, 王滢, 陈青生. Duxseal隔振性能数值分析与现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1770-1780.
[10] 简文彬, 黄聪惠, 罗阳华, 聂闻. 降雨入渗下非饱和坡残积土湿润锋运移试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1123-1133.
[11] 韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[12] 黄晓虎, 易武, 黄海峰, 邓永煌. 优势流入渗与坡体变形关系研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1396-1403.
[13] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[14] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[15] 宋义敏, 张 悦, 许海亮, 王亚飞, 贺志杰. 基于非均匀特征的岩石蠕滑与黏滑变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!