›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1259-1267.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桩柱结构在地震作用下非线性响应研究

梁书秀1，孙昭晨1，张卫平1，王兴刚2   

  1. 1.大连理工大学 港口海岸与近海工程国家重点实验室，辽宁 大连 116024；2.南京水利科学研究院，江苏 南京210029
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-23 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 孙昭晨，男，1960年生，博士，教授，主要从事波浪及其与建筑物的相互作用方面的研究工作。E-mail: sunzc@dlut.edu.cn E-mail: sxliang@dlut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:梁书秀，女，1972年生，博士，副教授，主要从事海岸和近海工程动力环境数值模拟方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家创新研究群体科学基金（No. 51221961）；国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）（No. 2007AA11Z130）

Nonlinear dynamic response of pile structure under earthquake loading

LIANG Shu-xiu1, SUN Zhao-chen1, ZHANG Wei-ping1, WANG Xing-gang2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian ,Liaoning 116024, China; 2. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing , Jiangsu 210029, China
  • Received:2014-07-23 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Founds for Innovation Research Team of China and the National High-tech R & D Program of China(863 Program).

PDF (Chinese)

978

摘要： 基于试验基础上建立的经典弹塑性模型——剑桥模型能够准确描述正常固结土的应力-应变关系。当土体的应力历史上经历过卸载或受到循环交变荷载作用即进入超固结状态，它作为土的应力历史的反映,相比正常固结土受力特性有着显著的差异。为研究超固结因素对土体加载特性的影响，在引入能考虑超固结状态影响的下负荷面剑桥模型后，通过三轴压缩和剪切试验对处于超固结状态下土体的受力特性进行了对比分析，并对循环剪切加载下的应力-应变关系以及超固结比的演化规律进行了研究。结果表明，下负荷面剑桥模型能准确反映超固结因素对土体力学特性的影响，相比原状土有着更高的屈服强度。而通过数值模拟自由场地基在地震作用下的动力响应可以看出,超固结因素对地基的动力响应起到了不可忽略的影响，尤其在强震下更需要考虑其影响。在自由场地基地震动力响应基础上，通过对桩柱结构桩-土耦合系统在地震作用下非线性动力响应的模拟对土体非线性以及超固结因素的影响进行了对比研究，研究表明：土体的非线性因素能显著降低结构振动响应中的高频成分，由于土体在交变加载下很快进入超固结状态，相对于剑桥模型，下负荷面剑桥模型在考虑超固结因素后土体的承载性能显著提高，尤其在强震作用下超固结因素带来的影响更加明显，因此，建议对桩基结构物地震响应研究考虑超固结因素影响，以提高桩基结构物地震响应模拟的精确度和可靠性。

关键词: 非线性响应, 桩-土耦合, 下负荷面剑桥模型, 超固结

Abstract: As a classic elastoplastic constitutive model, the Cam Clay model can precisely describe the stress-strain relationship of remolded and normally consolidated clay. While soil stress experiences unloading or cyclic loading, the soil may become overconsolidated. An overconsolidated soil shows different mechanical behavior compared to its normally consolidated counterpart. To investigate the mechanical properties of overconsolidated soil, a subloading-surface Cam Clay model, which takes overconsolidation factor into account, is introduced. Then a comparative analysis is carried out for the triaxial compression tests and shear tests of overconsolidated soil, and the stress-strain relationship and OCR variation of the soil under cyclic loading are also studied in detail. The results show that overconsolidation factor can significantly influence the mechanical properties of soil, and the soil has higher yield strength than its normally consolidated counterpart. In addition, the dynamic response of free field under earthquake incidence is analyzed, showing that the influence of overconsolidation factor plays a very important role in the seismic response of soil ground, especially under high-magnitude earthquake incidence. Based on the results of the free-field analysis, the nonlinear dynamic response of a typical pile-soil coupled system under earthquake incidence is analyzed. The results show that the high-frequency component of structure is significantly suppressed by the influence of soil nonlinearity. Because the soil quickly turns into overconsolidated state under cyclic loading, its strength increases significantly, if the subloading-surface Cam Clay model is adopted, when the overconsolidation factor is taken into account, especially under the incidence of high-magnitude earthquake. Therefore, to guarantee the accuracy and reliability of the simulation for pile supported structure under earthquake incidence, it is necessary to account for the overconsolidation effect.

Key words: nonlinear response, pile-soil coupling, subloading surface Cam-clay model, overconsolidation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[2] 王秋生, 周济兵. 基于广义热力学的超固结土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4178-4184.
[3] 郑 刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈 达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[4] 孙 凯，陈正林，路德春，. 一种考虑黏聚强度的改良土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1589-1597.
[5] 杨光昌，白 冰. 考虑超固结效应的不同温度路径下饱和粉质黏土的热固结[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 71-77.
[6] 纠永志，祝彦知，. 开挖条件下非均质地基中单桩竖向承载特性非线性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1666-1674.
[7] 纠永志，黄茂松, . 超固结软黏土的静止土压力系数与不排水抗剪强度[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 951-957.
[8] 庄 超，周志芳，李兆峰，郭巧娜. 一种确定超固结弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 61-66.
[9] 李传勋，徐 超，谢康和，. 考虑非达西渗流和应力历史的土体非线性固结研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 91-100.
[10] 李 林，李镜培，岳著文，唐剑华, . 饱和黏土中钻孔灌注桩孔壁稳定性力学机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2496-2504.
[11] 于亚磊 ，叶冠林 ，熊永林，. 上海第4层黏土力学特性的弹塑性本构模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2541-2546.
[12] 王智超 ，金 刚 ，吴晓峰 ，邓旭华 ，董 辉，. 非饱和压实土率相关变形特征与时效模型[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 719-727.
[13] 王智超 ，蒋明镜 ，陈双林 ，蔡 军,. 基于上下负荷面的弹黏塑性本构模型及应力积分算法实现[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 357-366.
[14] 孔令明，姚仰平. 超固结土热黏弹塑性本构关系[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 1-8.
[15] 胡 靖 ，顾晓强 ，黄茂松 , . 基于离散元法的静止土压力系数分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 624-628.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发