›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1467-1474.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.031

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地区深基坑围护结构综合刚度研究

张 戈,毛海和   

  1. 北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司,北京 310000
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-22 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:张戈,男,1982年生,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事城市轨道交通结构设计、岩土工程科研方面的工作。

A new system stiffness of retaining structure of deep foundation pit in soft soil area

ZHANG Ge, MAO Hai-he   

  1. Beijing Urban Construction Design and Development Group Limited, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2015-06-22 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 为了预测地铁深基坑开挖阶段围护结构的变形特性,从围护结构综合刚度的角度研究了软土地区地铁深基坑的围护结构设计方法。鉴于Clough综合刚度模型存在诸多缺陷,提出了新的MVSS综合刚度模型,其包含了围护墙(桩)刚度、基坑深度、支撑刚度、支撑水平及竖向间距、地基加固等多个变量,反映了基坑围护结构的整体属性。从有限元计算及地铁基坑实测变形等角度验证了MVSS综合刚度合理性,并建立了地铁深基坑围护结构侧向变形与基坑围护综合刚度之间的函数算式。该算式为基坑围护结构的变形预测提供了新的思路与方法。基坑围护结构最大侧向变形与基坑MVSS综合刚度呈递减函数关系,但当其MVSS综合刚度增大至一定程度后,其继续增大对基坑围护结构变形的进一步控制效果甚微。

关键词: 深基坑, 围护结构, Clough综合刚度, MVSS综合刚度

Abstract: In order to predict the deformation characteristics of retaining structure in deep foundation pit excavation, we study the design method of subway station excavation retaining structure in soft soil foundation pit from a retaining structure’ system stiffness point of view. A new concept of system stiffness, i.e. multiple variables system stiffness (MVSS) is proposed in view of the defects of Clough composite stiffness model. In addition to the stiffness of the retaining wall and the vertical spacing between the supports, as included in the original Clough model, several important parameters are introduced in the proposed MVSS model, including the depth of the foundation pit, the bracing stiffness, the horizontal spacing between the supports, basement reinforcement. Finite element method is employed to calculate the maximal lateral displacement of the retaining structure. The results show that the proposed MVSS model can describe excellently the deformation of the retaining structure. The measured displacement data from several foundation pits also validates the applicability of proposed method. Therefore, the proposed model is a liable and valuable way to determine the system stiffness of the deep foundation pit of subway in different strata. There exists a negative correlation between retaining structure of foundation pit and maximum lateral deformation, excavation MVSS comprehensive stiffness, but when the MVSS comprehensive stiffness increases up to a certain degree, the continued increase of MVSS comprehensive stiffness has an insignificant effect on controlling further the deformation of the retaining structure of foundation pit.

Key words: deep foundation pit, excavation retaining structure, Clough system stiffness, MVSS system stiffness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 476.3

[1] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[2] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[3] 刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及 邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[4] 李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[5] 周 勇,朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
[6] 刘成禹,陈淑云,. 基坑围护结构增量计算法的改进[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1834-1839.
[7] 贾金青,高军程,涂兵雄,张 磊,王海涛,高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[8] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[9] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[10] 庄海洋,张艳书,薛栩超,徐 烨,. 深软场地地铁狭长深基坑变形特征实测与已有统计结果的对比分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
[11] 陈 昆,闫澍旺,孙立强,王亚雯,. 开挖卸荷状态下深基坑变形特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1075-1082.
[12] 王建华,李江腾,廖 峻, . 土钉墙+排桩在明挖隧道深基坑支护中的几个问题[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1109-1117.
[13] 康志军 ,谭 勇 ,李 想 ,卫 彬 ,徐长节,. 基坑围护结构最大侧移深度对周边环境的影响[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2909-2914.
[14] 李 栋,张琪昌,靳 刚,王 婧. 考虑拱效应深基坑支护结构土压力分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 401-405.
[15] 丁 智,王 达,王金艳,魏新江. 浙江地区软弱土深基坑变形特点及预测分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 506-512.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!