›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 872-880.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0680

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高铁列车荷载作用下桩网复合地基振动特性模型试验

牛婷婷1, 2,刘汉龙1, 3,丁选明3,陈育民1   

  1. 1. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京210098;2. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001;3. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-05 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:牛婷婷,女,1981年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事软土地基处理方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    长江学者创新团队项目资助(No.IRT1125);国家自然科学基金资助(No.51378177,No.51420105013);安徽理工大学青年科学研究基金(No.QN201105)。

Piled embankment model test on vibration characteristics under high-speed train loads

NIU Ting-ting1, 2, LIU Han-long1, 3, DING Xuan-ming3, CHEN Yun-min1   

  1. 1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2016-04-05 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Changjiang Scholar and Innovative Research Team Project (IRT1125), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378177, 51420105013) and the Youth Science Fund of Anhui University of Science and Technology (QN201105).

摘要: 桩网复合地基是高速铁路广为应用的基础形式之一,其在高速列车荷载作用下的振动响应对列车运营安全和周围环境有着至关重要的影响。基于此,以现浇X形桩为对象,建立了桩网复合地基大比例尺模型,开展了桩网复合地基在高铁列车荷载作用下的动力响应特性研究,揭示了加载频率、加载幅值及振次的改变对桩网复合地基振动速度影响的规律。试验结果表明:速度响应幅值沿着路堤横向衰减较快,路堤耗能作用显著,列车运行产生的振动对周边环境影响较小。速度响应幅值沿桩网复合地基深度方向的衰减规律与横向振动传播规律有所不同。速度响应幅值从轨道板与钢筋混凝土底座到基床表层,衰减最快;加筋碎石垫层次之,相当于一个隔震垫层;地基中桩的存在使振动衰减变得缓慢,使由列车运行引起的振动影响深度加大。速度响应幅值随着加载频率的增加而逐渐变大,在25 Hz时出现峰值;速度响应幅值随着加载幅值的增加逐渐变大;速度响应幅值随着振次增加而基本保持不变。

关键词: 振动速度, 高铁列车荷载, 桩网复合地基, 模型试验

Abstract: A piled embankment with reinforcement is one of embankments widely used by high-speed railways. The effect of vibration velocity response under train loads of high-speed railways on train running safety and surroundings is crucially important. A large-scale piled embankment model was set up with X-section cast-in-place concrete pile as vertical reinforcement. The vibration performance of the piled embankment under train load of high-speed railways was investigated. The influence of loading frequencies, loading amplitudes, and the number of cycles on vibration velocity of the piled embankment model was revealed in this paper. The results show that it is faster for attenuation of vibration velocity along the transverse direction of the piled embankment. The impact of the embankment on energy dissipation is remarkable, so the effect of vibration induced by train running on surroundings is weaker. The attenuation of vibration velocity along the piled embankment depth is different from the transverse direction of the piled embankment. The piled embankment system shows the greatest attenuation of vibration velocity is from track slab and reinforced concrete base to surface layer of subgrade bed. The gravel cushion with geogrids attenuates less due to shock isolation cushion. The piles in the foundation make attenuation of vibration velocity by train running slower and influence depth deeper. Vibration velocity amplitude increases gradually with the increase of loading frequency, and reaches a peak at 25 Hz. It becomes bigger step by step with the increase of loading amplitude and stays the same with the increase of the numbers of cycles.

Key words: vibration velocity, train load of high-speed railways, piled embankment with reinforcement, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[10] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[11] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[14] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!