›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 1857-1867.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.07.005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于热力学并考虑体变及滞回效应的土-水特征曲线模型

黄启迪1,赵成刚1, 2,蔡国庆1   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院岩土工程系,北京 100044;2. 桂林理工大学 土木与建筑工程学院,广西 桂林 541004
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-02 出版日期:2016-07-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:黄启迪,男,1984年生,博士研究生,主要从事非饱和土力学的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51278047,No. 51478135);北京市自然科学基金(No. 8162032);中央高校基本科研业务费(No. 2015JBM068);广西岩土力学与工程重点实验室开放基金(No. 14-KF-05)。

A thermodynamics-based soil-water characteristic model with considering volumetric change and hysteresis

HUANG Qi-di1,ZHAO Cheng-gang1, 2,CAI Guo-qing1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • Received:2015-11-02 Online:2016-07-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278047, 51478135), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundamental (8162032), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015JBM068) and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (14-KF-05).

摘要: 基于热力学内变量理论,提出能综合考虑毛细滞回效应和非饱和土体积变形影响的土-水特征曲线模型。热力学第二定律推导结果表明:毛细滞回现象和塑性变形本质上是一种耗散行为;吸力和饱和度的变化不仅与流相变化直接相关,而且也受到固相体积变化的约束与影响;土-水特征曲线的流相体积变化与固相变形之间存在相互耦合作用。从微观上阐明滞回现象产生的机制以及变形对吸力的影响,建立了考虑体变及滞回效应的土-水特征曲线一般性模型。然后采用边界面塑性理论,在只增加两个新参数的情况下,建立了一个简化的能描述毛细滞回及塑性孔隙比变化影响的新模型。最后,利用已有试验数据对这一模型进行了验证,结果表明,新模型能考虑土体变形的影响,并能较为准确地描述毛细滞回现象,模型预测结果与已有的试验数据吻合较好。

关键词: 土-水特征曲线, 体积变化, 滞回效应, 耗散

Abstract: Based on the theory of thermodynamic with internal variables, a soil water characteristic curve model is developed, which can comprehensively consider the effect of capillary hysteresis and volume deformation of unsaturated soil. Based on the second law of thermodynamics, it is shown that both capillary hysteresis and plastic deformation represent some kind of dissipative behavior in nature. The suction is not only related to the changes of fluid phases, but also controlled by the deformation of solid phase. There is mutual coupling effect due to the interaction between the soil-water characteristics and the solid phase deformation. The mechanism of hysteresis phenomenon and the effect of deformation on the suction force are expounded from a microscopic standpoint and a general model of soil-water characteristic curve is established. Then a boundary surface plasticity model is developed, from which a simplified model is developed to describe the influence of the capillary hysteresis and plastic void ratio change. The model is validated using the experimental data. The results show that the new model can address the effect of soil deformation, and accurately describe the capillary hysteresis phenomenon.

Key words: soil-water characteristic curve, volume change, hysteresis effect, dissipation

中图分类号: 

  • O 414

[1] 谌文武, 贾全全, 童艳梅. 莫高窟壁画地仗土-水特征曲线的测定与拟合[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1483-1491.
[2] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[3] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[4] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[5] 马德鹏, 周岩, 刘传孝, 商岩冬, . 不同卸围压速率下煤样卸荷破坏能量演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2645-2652.
[6] 赵振华, 张晓君, 李晓程, . 含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2192-2199.
[7] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[8] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[9] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[10] 肖晓春, 樊玉峰, 吴迪, 丁鑫, 王磊, 赵宝友, . 组合煤岩破坏过程能量耗散特征及冲击危险评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4203-4212.
[11] 陶高梁,李 进,庄心善,肖衡林,崔惜琳,徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[12] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[13] 段敏克,蒋长宝,俞 欢,陆天宇,钮彬炜,孙东玲,. 分级加-卸载条件下原煤的渗透及能耗特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1346-1354.
[14] 陶高梁,柏 亮,袁 波,甘世朝. 土-水特征曲线与核磁共振曲线的关系[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 943-948.
[15] 黎澄生,孔令伟,柏 巍,安 然,李甜果, . 土-水特征曲线滞后阻塞模型[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 598-604.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!