›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 2056-2062.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.07.029

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

厚松散层下开采地表动态移动变形规律实测及预测研究

许国胜,李德海,侯得峰,张彦宾   

  1. 河南理工大学 能源科学与工程学院,河南 焦作 454000
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-03 出版日期:2016-07-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:许国胜,男,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事地表移动变形规律、岩层控制与特殊开采方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 61340041);河南理工大学博士基金项目(No. B2014-056)。

Measurement and prediction of the transientsurface movement and deformation induced by mining under thick alluvium

XU Guo-sheng,LI De-hai,HOU De-feng,ZHANG Yan-bin   

  1. Institute of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
  • Received:2015-10-03 Online:2016-07-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (61340041) and the Doctoral Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University (B2014-056).

摘要: 为了掌握厚松散层覆盖地区地表在采动过程中的动态移动变形情况,以地表移动观测站实测数据为基础,获得厚松散层开采地表动态移动参数在开采过程中的变化规律,以及走向主断面方向上任意时刻、任意点的下沉速度预计公式。结果表明:当工作面推过最大下沉点170 m左右时,该点的下沉速度达到最大值,其值为22.85 mm/d;地表点最大下沉速度值及其滞后距随工作面开采距离的增大而增加,当工作面推进距离达到600 m左右后,两者增加的幅度逐渐减小,并分别达到稳定值22.00 mm/d和150 m,认为此后的采动过程是地表点下沉速度曲线以固定形状与工作面保持一定的滞后距随开采不断向前移动;参考国内松散层下开采案例,通过多元线性回归分析得到地表动态移动变形参数与地质及开采技术参数之间的关系式;最后根据动态移动参数在采动过程中的变化规律,建立了走向断面上任意时刻、任意点的下沉速度预测公式,通过预测值与实测值的对比,认为预测结果能够满足工程实践需要。

关键词: 开采沉陷, 厚松散层, 动态移动变形, 下沉速度, 多元线性回归分析

Abstract: To evaluate the mining-induced surface movement and deformation in the coal field covered with thick alluvium, the parameters used to characterize the surface displacement are determined with the process of mining, and a formulation for calculating the subsidence velocity is developed based on the measured data from the surface observation stations. The results show that when the working face is pushed to the maximum settlement point of 170 m, the point of the sinking speed reaches the maximum value of 22.85 mm/d. The longer distance the panel advances, the higher value the surface maximum subsidence velocity reaches, so with its lagging distance. However, after the distance of the panel advancing is over about 600 m, the increase of these values is gradually much smaller, and then these values reach stable state of 22.00 mm/d and 165 m. In the following mining process, the surface subsidence velocity curve constantly moves forward with a fixed shape and lagging distance to panel. With domestic mining cases in the area covered with thick alluvium, relativity between dynamic subsidence parameters and the geological and mining technical parameters is analyzed with multiple regression method. At last, based on dynamic subsidence parameters variation, subsidence velocity prediction formula is obtained, which can predict subsidence velocity of any position at any time along the strike major cross direction. Comparing the expected value with measured value, it is proved that the expected results can meet the needs of the engineering practice.

Key words: mining subsidence, thick alluvium, dynamic movement and deformation, subsidence velocity, multiple linear regression analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 478

[1] 郭旭炜, 杨晓琴, 柴双武. 分段Knothe函数优化及其动态求参[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2091-2097.
[2] 刘文生,吴作启,梁怀杰,. 南票矿区松散层土体结构性参数试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1725-1732.
[3] 张 兵,崔希民, . 开采沉陷动态预计的分段Knothe 时间函数模型优化[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 541-548.
[4] 赵晓东,陈 阳,蒋 建. 任意形状工作面沉陷预测的概率积分法及其应用[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3387-3392.
[5] 王正帅 ,邓喀中. 采动区地表动态沉降预测的Richards模型[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1664-1668.
[6] 王晓霖 ,帅 健 ,张建强. 开采沉陷区埋地管道力学反应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3373-3378.
[7] 张春会,赵全胜. 基于ARCGIS的矿山开采沉陷灾害预警系统[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2197-2202.
[8] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903-2907.
[9] 任 松,姜德义,杨春和,蒋再文. 岩盐水溶开采沉陷新概率积分三维预测模型研究[J]. , 2007, 28(1): 133-138.
[10] 尹光志 ,岳 顺 ,代高飞 , . 隧道掘进拱部运动力学模型研究[J]. , 2005, 26(6): 845-849.
[11] 李云鹏 , 王芝银 . 开采沉陷三维损伤有限元分析[J]. , 2003, 24(2): 183-187.
[12] 罗筱波, 周 健. 多元线性回归分析法计算顶管施工引起的地面沉降[J]. , 2003, 24(1): 130-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!