›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 782-788.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0757

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

滑坡防治格构梁锚固系统振动台模型试验

汪班桥,李 楠,门玉明,张妙芝   

  1. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-06 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:汪班桥,女,1977年生,博士,副教授,主要从事锚固边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41440021);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No.2014G1261049)。

Shaking table model test for framed anchors in landslide prevention

WANG Ban-qiao, LI Nan, MEN Yu-ming, ZHANG Miao-zhi   

  1. School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2016-04-06 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41440021) and the Special Funds for Basic Research Funds in Central Universities (l2014G1261049).

摘要: 为研究地震作用下锚固系统的动力响应,采用振动台进行格构梁锚杆支护滑坡模型试验。试验分别输入汶川波、EL Centro波、正弦波作为地震激励,监测锚杆轴力、坡体加速度和位移时程,研究锚固滑坡在地震作用下的动力响应差别、不同位置锚杆在地震作用下的受力机制。结果表明:低量级地震波(0.05 g~0.40 g)作用下,坡脚相对坡体的其他部位,浅表效应表现明显,坡脚滑面由于反复的揉搓作用,更容易出现裂缝,影响整个锚固体的稳定;建议在拟静力法设计的基础上,在滑坡坡脚密集地打入短锚杆或土钉以平衡坡脚滑面处出现的不协调往复运动。高量级地震波作用(0.6 g~0.8 g)下,坡肩处坡表效应表现明显、坡顶滑面处裂缝宽度不断增长,更易出现崩裂、崩滑等现象;建议加长坡顶的第1排锚杆,以抑制坡顶滑面处裂缝的下切发展;同时在坡顶面垂直地打入短锚杆或种植根系发达的植物护坡。格构梁锚固系统不会出现素土边坡的整体性破坏,强震作用下,首先是坡脚锚杆的承载能力受到损伤,顶层锚杆的抗拉力则因坡顶面及上表面的拉裂急剧增长。研究结果为更加合理地进行锚杆抗震设计提供了良好的基础。

关键词: 滑坡, 锚固系统, 地震作用, 动力响应, 振动台试验

Abstract: In order to study the dynamic responses of anchorage system under earthquake,the model of landslide supported by anchor bars and lattice beam is carried out using shaking table. The difference of dynamic response of anchor bars in different locations and the mechanism behavior of anchor bars under earthquake are studied by inputting waves of Wenchuan earthquake, EL Centro earthquake and sine seismic wave to monitor the axial force of anchor bars, landslide acceleration and landslide displacement. The results suggest that under low level earthquake loading (0.05 g~0.40 g), the surface effect of slope toe is more obvious than other parts of the landslide, and the sliding surface near slope toe is prone to fracturing because of repeated rubbing and cutting. Based on pseudo-static method design, it is advised that short anchors or soil nails should be driven into toe slope in order to balance the uncoordinated reciprocating motion of sliding surface near slope. Under high level earthquake loading (0.6 g~0.8 g), the surface effect of slope shoulder is more obvious, the fracture in sliding surface near slope top is longer and wider than before, and the sliding surface is more likely to crack or collapse. It is advised that the first-row anchors should be extended in order to restrain the development of cracks in slope sliding surface. Meanwhile, using short anchors or growing plants with developed root system at top of the slope is necessary to protect the slope. Slope with anchorage system is not prone to as-a-whole slope damage like plain soil slope, and under high level earthquake loading, firstly anchors in slope toe are damaged, and then tensile force of top anchors sharply rises due to cracks caused by pulling force at the top surface of slope. The results provide a reasonable foundation for the design of anchor bars under earthquake.

Key words: landslide, anchorage system, earthquake, dynamic response, shaking table test

中图分类号: 

  • P 642

[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 罗刚, 张辉傲, 马国涛, 周海文, 胡卸文, 王文健, 王文沛, . 高速岩质滑坡滑面滑动摩擦特性研究——以王山 抓口寺滑坡为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2441-2452.
[7] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[8] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[9] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[10] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[11] 王立安, 赵建昌, 侯小强, 刘生纬, 王作伟. 非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[12] 简文彬, 黄聪惠, 罗阳华, 聂闻. 降雨入渗下非饱和坡残积土湿润锋运移试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1123-1133.
[13] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[14] 韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[15] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!