›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1479-1490.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0856

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏州第四纪深厚沉积层一维等效线性和非线性地震反应对比分析

朱 姣1, 2,许汉刚2, 3,陈国兴1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009; 3. 江苏省地震局,江苏 南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-22 出版日期:2018-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: gxchen@njtech.edu.cn E-mail:zhujiao90@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱姣,女,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事场地地震效应方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51378258,No. 51438004)。

Comparison of 1D equivalent-linear and nonlinear seismic site responses for quaternary deep sediment layers in Suzhou region

ZHU Jiao1, 2, XU Han-gang2, 3, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 3. Earthquake Administration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378258, 51438004).

摘要: 合理描述土体动力本构关系对场地设计地震动参数取值的准确性有显著影响。以苏州城区200 m深的钻孔剖面为研究对象,对比分析了一维等效线性波传分析法(ELA法)和基于修正Matasovic本构模型的多自由度集中质量非线性分析法(NLA法)给出的深厚场地地震反应,研究了基岩输入地震动特性和地震基岩面的选取对深厚场地地震反应的影响。结果表明:(1)随基岩地震动强度(PGA)的增大,ELA法给出的地表PGA呈单调递增的特征,而NLA法给出的地表PGA呈先快速增大后缓慢减小或几乎不变的趋势;(2)ELA法和NLA法给出的地表加速度反应谱(Sa谱)在短周期范围内存在明显差异,ELA法对基岩高频地震动具有显著的滤波效应,而NLA法对基岩高频地震动的影响表现为随基岩PGA的增大先放大后减小的特征;(3)随地震基岩面深度的增大,地表Sa谱的谱值呈现出稍许增大的趋势,但对周期T<0.1 s部分,NLA法给出的地表Sa谱的谱值则呈现出稍许减小的现象;(4)中、大震作用下,地表地震动持时不仅与基岩地震动特性有关,还与地震反应分析方法和地震基岩面的选取密切相关,NLA法能更合理地反映基岩地震动强度和上覆土层厚度对地表地震动持时的影响。

关键词: 深厚场地, 地震反应, 等效线性, 非线性, 峰值加速度, 谱加速度, 地震动持时

Abstract: A reasonable description of soil hysteretic constitutive relation has a significant impact on the evaluation of design ground motion parameters. Based on the 200-meter deep borehole profile in Suzhou region, the 1-D seismic site response analyses were performed by equivalent linear wave propagation analysis (ELA) and nonlinear analysis (NLA) using a multi-degree-of-freedom, lumped mass model in term of the modified Matasovic constitutive model. The effects of bedrock motion characteristics and bedrock interface depth on site response in deep sediment layers were analyzed. The results show that: 1) Surface peak ground acceleration (PGA) calculated by ELA increases monotonically as the PGA of bedrock motion increases. However, surface PGA calculated by NLA first rapidly increases and then gradually decreases or keeps constant. 2) Surface acceleration response spectra (Sa) for short periods computed using ELA and NLA show significant differences. The high-frequency contents of bedrock motions exhibit obvious filtering in ELA, while the high-frequency contents in NLA first magnify and then attenuate as the PGA of bedrock motion increases. 3) Surface Sa values become slightly larger with increasing bedrock surface depth. However, surface Sa values for the periods less than 0.1 s computed by NLA become slightly smaller. 4) For the medium or strong bedrock motions, the surface ground motion duration is closely related to bedrock motion characteristics, site response analysis methods and seismic bedrock surface depth. The influence of bedrock motion intensity and the overburden thickness on the duration prolongation of surface ground motion can be reasonably evaluated by NLA.

Key words: deep sediment layers, seismic site response, equivalent linearity, nonlinearity, peak ground acceleration, acceleration response spectrum, ground motion duration

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435

[1] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[2] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] 李佳龙, 李钢, 于龙. 隔离非线性平面应变单元模型及其 在Drucker-Prager模型中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[4] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[5] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[6] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[7] 柯锦福, 王水林, 郑宏, 杨永涛, . 基于修正对称和反对称分解的 三维数值流形元法应用推广[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 695-706.
[8] 于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[9] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[10] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[11] 韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 李立云, 赵密, 万宁潭, 杜修力. 纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性 地震反应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[12] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[13] 龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[14] 罗庆姿, 陈晓平, 袁炳祥, 冯德銮, . 柔性侧限条件下软土的变形特性及固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2264-2274.
[15] 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周 洋, 闫 婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!