›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1395-1400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1048

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于权重反分析的岩溶地面塌陷危险性评价方法研究

李建朋1,聂庆科2,刘泉声3,于俊超2   

  1. 1. 河北省交通规划设计院,河北 石家庄 050011;2. 河北建设勘察研究院有限公司,河北 石家庄 050031; 3. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-09 出版日期:2018-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:李建朋,男,1982年生,博士,工程师,主要从事岩土工程勘察与稳定性评价方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    河北省交通运输厅科技项目(No. 20130012)。

Risk assessment method of karst ground collapse based on weight back analysis

LI Jian-peng1, NIE Qing-ke2, LIU Quan-sheng3, YU Jun-chao2   

  1. 1. Hebei Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institue, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China; 2. Hebei Research Institute of Construction and Geotechnical Investigation Co. Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050031, China; 3. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2016-05-09 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by Hebei Provincial Department of Transportation Science and Technology Project (20130012).

摘要: 为能快速、准确地对覆盖型岩溶发育区进行地面塌陷危险性评价,提出了基于权重反分析的岩溶地面塌陷危险性评价方法。该方法在确定岩溶地面塌陷主要影响因素的基础上,收集整理了唐山地区100个典型工程实例,进而采用权重反分析方法,求得了岩溶地面塌陷各主要影响因素的权重,并建立了岩溶地面塌陷危险性综合评价的评分表。权重反分析结果表明,选取的5个主要因素的权重分别为:岩溶发育程度0.338、第四系底部隔水层隔水能力0.255、覆盖层厚度0.186、基岩水水位埋深0.174、距断裂距离0.047,采用新建立的评分表对100个工程实例的评价结果显示,其评价的正确率达到99%,证明该表具有良好的可行性与有效性。此外,该评分表具有评价因子易于获取、评价过程简单易懂等特点,可准确、快捷地对与唐山岩溶发育区相似区域的岩溶地面塌陷危险性给出评价,因而值得推广和应用。

关键词: 岩溶, 地面塌陷, 危险性评价, 权重, 反分析

Abstract: A new risk assessment method for karst ground collapse is presented in order to quickly and accurately assess the risk of surface subsidence in covered karst area. Firstly, the main factors were identified by mechanism analysis of karst ground collapse, and secondly the weight back analysis method was used to obtain the weights of main factors of karst ground collapse based on 100 typical engineering examples in Tangshan city. As a result, a score sheet of comprehensive hazard evaluation of karst ground collapse was established. Studies have shown that the weights of selected five main factors are as follows: karst development degree- 0.338, water-resisting capacity of impermeable layer-0.255, overburden thickness-0.186, depth of bedrock water level-0.174, and distance from the fault-0.047. The karst ground collapse hazard evaluation results of the 100 project examples based on the proposed score sheet have shown that the correct rate is 99% ,which can prove that the proposed method has a good performance in feasibility and effectiveness. In addition, the proposed method has the advantage of easy access of evaluation factors and high efficiency, and therefore it is worth popularizing and applying.

Key words: karst, ground collapse, risk assessment, weight, back analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42

[1] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[2] 杨道学, 赵奎, 曾鹏, 卓毓龙, . 基于粒子群优化算法的未知波速声发射 定位数值模[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
[3] 陈舞, 张国华, 王浩, 陈礼彪, . 基于粗糙集条件信息熵的山岭隧道坍塌风险评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3549-3558.
[4] 刘宗辉, 刘毛毛, 周东, 蓝日彦, 吴恒, 王业田, . 基于探地雷达属性分析的典型岩溶 不良地质识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3282-3290.
[5] 李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[6] 刘洋洋, 郭增长, 李永强, 李有鹏. 基于熵权集对分析和车载激光扫描的 公路边坡危险性评价模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 131-141.
[7] 孙明社,马 涛,申志军,吴 旭,王梦恕,. 复合式衬砌结构中衬砌分担围岩压力比例的研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[8] 王少杰,吕爱钟,张晓莉. 横观各向同性岩体中马蹄形隧洞的位移反分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
[9] 李术才,潘东东,许振浩,李利平,林 鹏,袁永才,高成路,路 为, . 承压型隐伏溶洞突水灾变演化过程模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3164-3173.
[10] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[11] 赵明华,唐咸力,肖 尧,杨超炜. 考虑厚跨比的基桩下伏溶洞顶板冲切特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1159-1167.
[12] 王洪波,张庆松,刘人太,李术才,张乐文,郑 卓,张连震. 基于压水试验的地层渗流场反分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 985-992.
[13] 赵明华,朱志仁,黄明华,杨超炜,徐卓君. 考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
[14] 李建朋 ,聂庆科,刘泉声,贾向新,. 唐山市岩溶地面塌陷稳定性评价的 Logistic回归模型[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 250-256.
[15] 田茂霖,肖洪天,闫强刚,. Hoek-Brown准则岩体力学参数非线性位移反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 343-350.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!