›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3329-3335.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.036

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑循环软化的非线性动力本构模型在FLAC3D中的实现

徐令宇1,蔡 飞2,陈国兴1,王国新3   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 210009;2. 日本群马大学大学院 理工学府 环境创生部门,桐生 376-8515; 3. 大连理工大学 建设工程学部,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-27 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:徐令宇,男,1988年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土地震工程领域研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51508271);江苏省自然科学基金项目(No. BK20150958);中国博士后科学基金项目(No. 2015M581782);江苏省博士后科学基金项目(No. 1501067B)。

Implementation of nonlinear dynamic constitutive model in FLAC3D with considering cyclic softening behaviors of soils

XU Ling-yu1, CAI Fei2, CHEN Guo-xing1, WANG Guo-xin3   

  1. 1. College of Transportation Science & Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Department of Environmental Engineering Science, Gunma University, Kiryu 376-8515, Japan; 3. Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • Received:2014-11-27 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508271), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20150958), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2015M581782) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (1501067B).

摘要: 已有震害研究表明,震后边坡会因持续变形而破坏,且伴随着土体强度逐渐降低的现象,即土的循环软化行为。因此,有必要研究考虑循环软化的非线性动力本构模型以用于复杂条件下地震边坡稳定性分析。在已有的非线性动力本构模型基础上,提出了考虑循环软化的处理方法。同时,在FLAC3D平台上实现了本构模型二次开发,并通过了理论公式与已有文献中试验数据的验证。结果表明:计算出的骨干曲线与理论公式一致,且计算出的动剪切模量比及阻尼比与试验数据吻合较好,能够克服Hardin-Drnevich模型和Davidenkov模型在较大应变处(>0.01%)过高地估算阻尼比的缺陷;考虑了循环软化后,计算出的剪切强度有明显降低,且当遇到骨干曲线剪应力可以连续地过渡到软化后的主干曲线上,模型的收敛性较好。所开发的本构模型可为大应变条件下软土场地及边坡地震灾害评估提供支持。

关键词: 非线性动力本构模型, 循环软化, 本构模型二次开发, 数值试验, 有限差分法

Abstract: Catastrophic failure of slopes often results from cyclic softening, i.e. onset of significant strains or strength loss in soils during earthquakes. Therefore, it is necessary to study the nonlinear dynamic constitutive model considering cyclic softening in order to analyze the stability of seismic slope under complex conditions. On the basis of existing nonlinear dynamic constitutive models, a method to deal with the cyclic softening is proposed. A secondary development of the constitutive model is implemented into the FLAC3D platform, and the proposed procedure is verified by the theoretical formulation and the experimental data available in the references. It is shown that the calculated backbone curve is consistent with the theoretical formula, and the calculated dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio are in good agreement with the experimental data. When the shear strain is larger than >0.01%, the modified model describes better the damping ratio-shear strain relationship than Hardin-Drnevich model and Davidenkov model. If the cyclic softening is taken into account, the calculated shear strength is significantly reduced, and the convergence of the model is improved when the shear stress of the backbone curve can be continuously transferred to the softening main curve. The developed constitutive model can provide support for the seismic disaster assessment of soft soil site and slope under large strain condition.

Key words: nonlinear dynamic constitutive model, cyclic softening, secondary development of constitutive model, numerical test, finite difference method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435

[1] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[2] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[3] 陈栋, 王恩元, 李楠, . 不同煤岩介质模型的波场特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 449-458.
[4] 刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的 一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[5] 龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[6] 袁 亮, 刘业娇, 田志超, 唐春安, 薛俊华, 段昌瑞, 张 寒, . 地面垂直钻孔预抽特厚煤层瓦斯数值试验与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 370-378.
[7] 黄生根,刘东军,胡永健,. 电磁波CT技术探测溶洞的模拟分析与应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 544-550.
[8] 李清川,李术才,王汉鹏,张红军,张 冰,张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[9] 薛 龙, 王 睿, 张建民, . 粒状介质三维复杂应力加载离散元数值试验方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4681-4690.
[10] 李传勋,董兴泉,金丹丹,谢康和,. 考虑起始水力坡降的软土大变形非线性固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 377-384.
[11] 谢新宇,韩冬冬,黄 利,王忠瑾,刘开富,. 粗糙条形基础极限承载力系数Nγ的计算[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 209-214.
[12] 董兴泉,李传勋,陈蒙蒙,张 军,谢康和,. 考虑非达西渗流的双层软土地基大变形非线性固结分析[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2321-2331.
[13] 张雅慧,汪丁建,唐辉明,李长冬,易贤龙. 基于PFC2D数值试验的异性结构面剪切强度特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1031-1041.
[14] 李 尧,李术才,徐 磊,刘 斌,林春金,张凤凯,杨 磊. 隧道衬砌病害地质雷达探测正演模拟与应用[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3627-3634.
[15] 李 超 ,刘红岩 ,阎锡东,. 动载下节理岩体破坏过程的数值试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 655-664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!