›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3356-3364.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.002

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真空联合堆载预压下混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基固结特性理论分析

叶观宝1, 2, 3,张晴雯1, 2, 3,张 振1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防控协同创新中心,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-30 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 张振,男,1984年生,博士,助理研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事软土地基处理理论与技术方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhenzhang@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:yeguanbao@vip.citiz.net
  • 作者简介:叶观宝,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基处理方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51508408,No.51078271)

Consolidation analysis of concrete-cored sand-gravel piles improved composite foundation under combined vacuum and surcharge preloading

YE Guan-bao1, 2, 3, ZHANG Qing-wen1, 2, 3, ZHANG Zhen1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Geohazard Prevention(CICGP), Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2014-10-30 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508408, 51078271).

摘要: 真空联合堆载预压与混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基相结合是处理深厚软土地基的一种新方法。该方法既能利用预制混凝土芯桩提高地基承载力,又能利用砂石外壳缩短排水路径、传递真空负压,加快固结。根据真空联合堆载预压下混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基的固结特点,将堆载预压和真空预压的固结效应分开考虑,然后再进行叠加,推导出了真空联合堆载预压下混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基的平均固结度解析解,并利用三维数值模拟对平均固结度解析解进行了验证。通过对解析解的参数分析,探讨了置换率、涂抹区大小及渗透系数、混凝土芯砂石桩长径比和芯桩率对混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基固结特性的影响。结果表明,混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基的固结速率随着置换率和芯桩率的增大而增大,随涂抹区和砂石外壳直径之比、未扰动区和涂抹区渗透系数之比、长径比的增大而减小。

关键词: 混凝土芯砂石桩, 真空联合堆载预压, 固结, 解析解, 软土

Abstract: a new ground improvement method is proposed to treat thick soft soil, which involves the use of concrete-cored sand-gravel piles with combined vacuum and surcharge preloading. In this method, the prefabricated inner piles are used to increase the bearing capacity of soft soil, and the outer sand piles are used to shorten drainage path, transmit vacuum pressures and accelerate consolidation of soft soil. According to the consolidation characteristics of the composite foundation improved by concrete-cored sand-gravel piles under combined vacuum and surcharge preloading, the analytical solutions of average degree of consolidation are derived by calculating the consolidation effects of the composite foundation under surcharge or vacuum preloading separately and then superposing them together. The effects of area replacement ratio of composite pile to soft soil, dimensions and permeability of the smear zone, length-diameter ratio of the concrete-cored sand-gravel column, and area ratio of the inner pile to the composite pile on the consolidation behaviors of the composite foundation are investigated by a parametric analysis based on the proposed solutions. The results show that the consolidation rate of the composite foundation increases with the increase of the area replacement ratio and the area ratio of the inner pile to the composite pile, and decreases with an increase of the diameter ratio of smear zone to composite pile, the permeability ratio of undisturbed zone to smear zone, the length-diameter ratio of the composite pile.

Key words: concrete-cored sand-gravel piles, combined vacuum and surcharge preloading, consolidation, analytical solution, soft soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[2] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[3] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[4] 李红坡, 梅国雄, 肖涛, 陈征. 涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1560-1566.
[5] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[6] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[7] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[8] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[9] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[10] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[11] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[12] 郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
[13] 刘国钊, 乔亚飞, 何满潮, 樊勇, . 活动性断裂带错动下隧道纵向响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 923-932.
[14] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[15] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!