›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3393-3400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

定面射孔新工艺对水力裂缝扩展影响研究

王素玲1,隋 旭1,朱永超2   

  1. 1. 东北石油大学 机械科学与工程学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318;2. 中国石油技术开发公司,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-31 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王素玲,女,1975年生,博士,教授,主要从事油气田地面工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家973项目(No.2015CB250900);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51374074);中石油基金(No.2013D-5006-0210)联合资助。

Effect of set surface perforating technology on hydraulic crack extension

WANG Su-ling1, SUI Xu1, ZHU Yong-chao2   

  1. 1. Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China; 2. PetroChina Technology & Development Corporation, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2014-12-31 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) ( 2015CB250900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374074) and the Fund of CNPC (2013D-5006-0210).

摘要: 定面射孔技术是为了提高体积压裂改造效果而提出的一种新的射孔方案。根据岩石力学及流-固耦合理论,建立了定面射孔地层的三维弹塑性流固-耦合地应力模型,采用数值方法进行求解,结合最大拉应力准则,研究了定面射孔水力裂缝的起裂规律。经过大量计算发现:定面射孔条件下,裂缝首先在射孔面内的射孔眼起裂,然后射孔眼相互贯通而形成扇形裂缝面,增大了水力裂缝的波及体积及井筒的连通性;同一平面内两侧孔眼在中间孔眼上产生的附加应力降低了Y方向主应力而增大了X方向和Z方向主应力,导致正断层采用定面射孔时,起裂压力较大,起裂压力随射孔方位角的增大而降低,只有当射孔方位角大于60°时,定面射孔起裂压力低于螺旋射孔起裂压力;对于逆断层,射孔方位角越小,起裂压力越低,且均低于螺旋射孔起裂压力;减小射孔间夹角、增大射孔直径及深度均可降低起裂压力。

关键词: 定面射孔, 流固耦合, 起裂压力, 裂缝形态, 数值分析

Abstract: The set surface perforation is the latest perforating technology which is proposed to improve fracture volume effect. Based on the theory of fluid-solid coupling and rock mechanics, a three-dimensional elastic-plastic fluid-solid coupling stress model for set surface perforation in stratums is developed. Based on the maximum tensile stress criterion, the crack rule of hydraulic fracture is obtained by numerical simulation. It can be seen from abundant calculations that under the condition of set surface perforation, crack first initiates in the perforation of the perforating plane, and then extends in the perforating surface to form a fan-shaped fracture surface, which increase the swept volume of hydraulic fracture and the wellbore connectivity. Both sides of the perforation produce additional stress in the middle perforation to reduce the principal stress of Y direction within the same plane and increase the principal stresses of the X and Z directions. Thus it is the reason that when set surface perforation is adopted for the normal fault, under a larger crack stress, the greater the perforation azimuth angle, the lower the crack pressure. Only when the perforating azimuth angle is greater than 60°, the set surface perforation crack pressure is lower than that of spiral perforation. For reverse fault, the smaller the perforation azimuth angle, the lower the crack pressure, and the crack pressure is lower than that of spiral perforation at any time. Reducing the angle between perforation and perforation, increasing the perforation diameter and depth can reduce the crack pressure effectively.

Key words: set surface perforation, fluid-solid coupling, crack pressure, cracks form, numerical analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 454

[1] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[2] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广. 基于流固耦合理论水下隧道冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1029-1038.
[3] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[4] 朱才辉, 崔 晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[5] 王 胤, 周令新, 杨 庆. 基于不规则钙质砂颗粒发展的拖曳力系数模型 及其在细观流固耦合数值模拟中应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2009-2015.
[6] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[7] 郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变 化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[8] 姚志华, 陈正汉, 方祥位, 黄雪峰, . 非饱和原状黄土弹塑性损伤流固耦 合模型及其初步应用 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 216-226.
[9] 王建军, 陈福全, 李大勇. 低填方加筋路基沉降的Kerr模型解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 250-259.
[10] 程 桦, 彭世龙, 荣传新, 孙泽辉, . 千米深井L型钻孔预注浆加固硐室围岩 数值模拟及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 274-284.
[11] 王志荣,贺 平,郭志伟,王永春. 考虑裂缝特性指标的煤层气“垂直井”起裂压力计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 369-377.
[12] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[13] 阿比尔的,郑颖人,冯夏庭,丛 宇,. 平行黏结模型宏细观力学参数相关性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1289-1301.
[14] 郭浩然,乔 兰,李 远. 能源桩与周围土体之间荷载传递模型的改进及其桩身承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4042-4052.
[15] 李一凡,董世明,潘 鑫,李念斌,原 野. 砂岩的I/III复合型断裂试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4063-4070.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!