›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3417-3426.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.010

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

临近地下室外墙影响下的挡土墙空间土压力研究

朱建明1, 2,林庆涛2, 3,高晓将2,高林生1   

  1. 1. 华北科技学院 安全工程学院,河北 三河 101601;2. 北方工业大学 土木工程学院,北京 100144; 3. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-19 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:朱建明,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿业与岩土工程方面的教学与科学研究。

Research on space earth pressure behind retaining wall adjacent to existing basements exterior wall

ZHU Jian-ming1, 2, LIN Qing-tao2, 3, GAO Xiao-jiang2, GAO Lin-sheng1   

  1. 1. College of Safety Engineering, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Sanhe, Hebei 101601, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2015-01-19 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 目前关于临近地下室外墙影响的挡土墙空间土压力的计算理论的研究还比较少,原有的平面应变条件下的理论不能满足挡土墙的长高比B/H较小时的挡土墙土压力计算要求。通过将土拱效应原理引入顾慰慈[8]建立的空间土压力计算模型,建立了考虑土拱效应的临近地下室外墙影响的空间土压力计算模型,根据挡土墙和地下室外墙的间距与土体破裂面状态的关系将该模型分为3种情况,并将各模型划分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ四个区域,通过在各个区域内取水平微分单元体,建立各微分单元体的水平和竖向静力平衡方程,推导出了各区相应的挡土墙空间主动土压力计算公式,该公式可以计算出墙背任意位置的主动土压力;并提出了空间土压力合力及其合力作用点的计算方法。通过算例计算可以直观地看出挡土墙后主动土压力的空间分布,由此可以看出,当空间效应存在时,考虑土拱效应的挡土墙主动土压力沿墙长的分布与平面应变条件时有很大的不同,此时挡土墙两端附近区域的主动土压力远小于平面应变条件下计算出的主动土压力,同时可以看出,考虑空间效应的挡土墙主动土压力合力作用点要比平面应变条件下的位置要高,挡土墙长高比B/H越小,空间效应对主动土压力沿墙长的分布和主动土压力合力作用点位置的影响越大。

关键词: 有限土体, 空间主动土压力, 土拱效应, 临近建筑物

Abstract: Currently the less effort of research on the theory of space earth pressure behind retaining wall adjacent to existing basements exterior wall has been made. the existing plane strain state theories can’t satisfy the calculation requirement of the earth pressure behind retaining wall adjacent to existing basements exterior wall when the length height ratio B/H of retaining wall is smaller. In this paper, soil arching effects principle is introduced into the space earth pressure calculation model built by GU[8] and a model for calculating space earth pressure is developed considering soil arching effect and existing basements exterior wall. Based on the relationship between the failure space and the distance of two walls, the soil between the retaining wall and the existing basement exterior wall is divided into four districts, I, II, III, IV. Formulas for calculating the space active earth pressure in every district behind the retaining wall are derived by establishing horizontal and vertical static equilibrium differential equation of the horizontal differential element taken from every district. The Formulas can be applied to calculate the active earth pressure wherever behind the retaining wall. Furthermore, the method of resultant force of the space active earth pressure and its position are also put forward. The spatial distribution of active earth pressure behind the retaining wall can be seen visually through the calculation of the numerical examples. Two conclusions can be drawn as follows: When the spatial effect exists, the active earth pressure distribution considering the soil arching effect along the retaining wall is quite different from that when the retaining wall is in the plane strain state; that is, the active earth pressures behind both ends of the retaining wall are much smaller than that in the plane strain state. The position of the active earth pressure resultant force point considering spatial effect is higher than that in plane strain state; and when the B/H gets smaller,the influence of spatial effect on the distribution of active earth pressure along the retaining wall and the position of the resultant force point will increase.

Key words: finite soil, space active earth pressure, soil arching effect, adjacent to buildings

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432

[1] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[2] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[3] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[4] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[5] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[6] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[7] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[8] 尹志强,佘成学,姚海林,卢 正,骆行文,. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[9] 赖丰文,陈福全,万梁龙,. 考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.
[10] 徐长节,梁禄钜,陈其志,刘元昆,. 考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1927-1934.
[11] 韩同春, 谢灵翔, 刘 振, . 坑中坑条件下基坑有限土体的被动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4404-4412.
[12] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[13] 杨明辉,戴夏斌,赵明华,罗 宏. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2029-2035.
[14] 李瑞林,周国庆,林 超,赵光思,陈国舟,. 考虑土拱效应的滑移面间非极限状态土压力解答[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3145-3153.
[15] 孙潇昊,缪林昌,林海山. 不同埋深砂土盾构隧道掘进开挖面前方土拱效应研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2980-2988.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!