›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3529-3536.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.023

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉质黏土强度指标的水化学敏感性研究

杨德欢1,颜荣涛1,韦昌富1, 2,张 敏1,张 芹1   

  1. 1. 桂林理工大学 广西建筑新能源与节能重点实验室,广西 桂林 541004; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-03 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 颜荣涛,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事有关于化学-力学耦合岩土工程问题的研究工作。E-mail: yrt301@163.com E-mail: ydh9008@126.com
  • 作者简介:杨德欢,男,1990年生,硕士研究生,主要从事环境岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.11372078,No.51309055);广西自然科学基金创新研究团队项目(No.2012GXNSFGA060001);广西自然科学基金青年项目(No.2014GXNSFBA118236)。

A study of water chemical sensitivity of strength indices of silty clay

YANG De-huan1, YAN Rong-tao1, WEI Chang-fu1, 2, ZHANG Min1, ZHANG Qin1   

  1. 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of New Energy and Building Energy Saving, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2014-12-03 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11372078, 51309055) and the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2012GXNSFGA060001) and the Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangxi (2014GXNSFBA118236).

摘要: 通过对重塑粉质黏土的液、塑限和固结慢速直剪试验,探讨了粉质黏土液限、塑性指数及抗剪强度与不同浓度NaCl孔隙溶液的关系。试验结果表明,随着孔隙溶液浓度增加,液限随之减小,塑性指数表现出粉土的性质;不同竖向正应力下的强度随浓度变化表现出较大的差异,正应力较低时,强度不断减小,而正应力较高时,则强度不断增大,正应力介于二者之间强度则先降后升;内摩擦角随浓度增加而增大,最终趋于稳定;黏聚力先迅速减小后逐渐回升,且均为负值。其性质变化主要是因为扩散双电层、颗粒间作用力以及孔隙比发生了改变。基于Terzaghi的有效应力原理,对饱和粉质黏土固结慢速直剪试验测得的负值黏聚力进行了分析和讨论,认为渗透压力对黏聚力起了非常重要的作用,从而使黏聚力成为负值。

关键词: 水-土化学作用, 粉质黏土, 液塑限试验, 直剪试验, 渗透压力

Abstract: A series of direct shear experiments was performed to investigate the influences of pore fluid concentration on the liquid limit, plastic index and shear strength of remolded silty clay. The experimental results indicate that the liquid limit decreases with the increase of pore solution concentration, and the plastic index is similar to that of silt. It is found that the variation of the shear strength with the concentration depends upon the vertical stress applied. For a low vertical stress, the shear strength decreases slightly as the concentration increases; for a medium vertical stress, the shear strength first decreases and then increases as the concentration increases; for a high vertical stress, however, the strength constantly increases as the concentration increases. In addition, the internal friction angle increases with the pore fluid concentration and approaches toward a stable value, while the cohesion decreases rapidly in the early stage, and gradually increases again, remaining at a negative values all the time. These features of the soil behavior can be attributed to the combing effect of electric diffuse double layers, the intergranular stress variation and the void ratio change under coupled chemical and mechanical interactions. Based on the Terzaghi's effective stress principle, the shear strength parameters of the tested saturated silty clay are analyzed, suggesting that the osmotic pressure plays an important role in the occurrence of the negative cohesion of clayey soils.

Key words: chemical action of water-soil, silty clay, consistency limits test, direct shear test, osmotic pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[2] 柴 维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[3] 杨德欢, 颜荣涛, 韦昌富, 潘雪瑛, 张芹, . 饱和黏土平均粒间应力的确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2075-2084.
[4] 李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[5] 陈国庆, 唐 鹏, 李光明, 张广泽, 王 栋, . 岩桥直剪试验声发射频谱特征及主破裂前兆分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.
[6] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[7] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[8] 胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈 服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[9] 秦昌安, 陈国庆, 郑海君, 唐 鹏. 端部岩桥直剪破坏试验及断裂条件[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 642-653.
[10] 周科平, 刘 维, 周彦龙, 林 允, 薛 轲. 不同渗透力的类充填体力学特性及损伤软化 本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3724-3732.
[11] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[12] 崔国建,张传庆,刘立鹏,周 辉,程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[13] 魏匡民,陈生水,李国英,吴俊杰, . 陡峻河谷高面板坝坝体与坝基接触效应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
[14] 刘家顺,张向东,孙嘉宝,杨建军,方天健. 主应力轴旋转下K0固结饱和粉质黏土孔压及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2787-2794.
[15] 高 樯,温 智,王大雁,牛富俊,谢艳丽,苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!