›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1737-1746.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1281

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉砂质板岩力学特性及各向异性特性

李志刚1, 2,徐光黎2,黄 鹏2,赵 欣3,伏永朋3,苏 昌4   

  1. 1. 扬州大学 建筑科学与工程学院,江苏 扬州 225127;2. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074; 3. 中国地质调查局 武汉地质调查中心,湖北 武汉430250;4. 湖北省地质局水文地质工程地质大队,湖北 荆州 434020
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-02 出版日期:2018-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 徐光黎,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学、地质灾害等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:xu1963@cug.edu.cn E-mail:lzgdyy@yzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李志刚,男,1988年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土力学、地质灾害防治等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 41472263);中国地质调查局资助项目(No. 12120114038701)。

Mechanical and anisotropic properties of silty slates

LI Zhi-gang1, 2, XU Guang-li2, HUANG Peng2, ZHAO Xin3, FU Yong-peng3, SU Chang4   

  1. 1. College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225127, China; 2. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 3. Geological Survey Center in Wuhan, China Geological Survey, Wuhan, Hubei 430250, China; 4. Hubei Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Jingzhou, Hubei 434020, China
  • Received:2016-06-02 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472263) and China Geological Survey (12120114038701).

摘要: 为研究鄂西北地区板岩的力学特性及各向异性特征,开展了志留系粉砂质板岩的单轴压缩和巴西劈裂试验,分析了试样的力学特性和各向异性特征以及在不同荷载作用下的变形破坏模式,揭示了不同破坏模式的力学机制,并通过数值分析研究了不同板理面角度板岩边坡破坏模式及力学机制。研究结果表明,粉砂质板岩中的板理面是影响岩体力学行为的弱面,使得粉砂质板岩表现出明显的各向异性的特征。在单轴压缩条件下,粉砂质板岩在垂直板理面方向比平行板理面方向更易变形,变形量更大;平行板理面方向加载时试样破坏类型为竖向劈裂型张拉破坏,其实质是压杆失稳;垂直板理面加载时试样的破坏类型为穿切板理面的劈裂型剪切破坏;所测得的力学参数各向异性也较明显。在劈裂荷载作用下,粉砂质板岩的破坏模式主要有张拉劈裂破坏和沿板理面剪切破坏两种,所得抗拉强度在平行板理面方向上最大,在垂直板理面方向上最小,两个方向上的抗拉强度均小于抗压强度。由于板理面间的抗拉强度极低,在受到与板理面呈小角度相交的劈裂荷载作用时,容易产生沿板理面的张拉劈裂或拉剪破坏,在实际工程中应尽量避免板理面间的受拉破坏和沿板理面的拉剪破坏。在边坡工程中,板理面倾向、倾角对边坡破坏模式及力学机制有较大影响,边坡防护治理需充分考虑这一影响。上述研究为粉砂质板岩区岩质边坡防护治理以及其他岩石工程设计与施工提供理论依据与技术基础。

关键词: 岩石力学, 粉砂质板岩, 单轴压缩试验, 巴西劈裂试验, 力学特性, 各向异性

Abstract: In this study, the uniaxial compression test and Brazilian splitting test were carried out on Silurian silty slates in northwest Hubei province to investigate their mechanical and anisotropic properties. The anisotropic mechanical properties and deformation failure modes of specimens were analysed under different loading conditions, and the corresponding mechanisms of different failure modes were revealed. Meanwhile, the numerical analysis was used to study failure modes and mechanical mechanisms of slate slopes with different angles of bedding planes. The results showed that bedding planes in silty slates were weak surfaces that affected mechanical properties of rock mass, resulting in obvious anisotropic characteristics of the silty slates. Under the uniaxial compression condition, the deformation of silty slates were easier in the direction of the vertical bedding plane than that of the parallel plane, and their deformation was more significant. The failure mode of the specimen was the vertical splitting tensile failure when the direction of the parallel plane was loaded, while the failure mode was the splitting shear failure cutting the bedding planes when the direction of the vertical plane was loaded. The anisotropy of measured mechanical parameters was relatively apparent. Under the action of splitting load, the failure modes of silty slates mainly included the tensile splitting failure and shear failure along the bedding plane. The obtained tensile strength was the largest in parallel bedding plane direction and was the smallest in the vertical bedding plane direction. The tensile strengths in both directions were lower than the compressive strengths. As the tensile strength between bedding planes was extremely low, tension-split failure or tension-shear failure was easily caused by the splitting load that intersected with the bedding plane at a small angle. Hence, the tension failure or tension-shear failure along bedding planes should be avoided as far as possible in practical engineering. The dip directions and angles of slates have great influences on failure modes and mechanics of slates slopes, which should be considered in the protection and treatment of rock slopes. Therefore, the results provide significant references for the protection and treatment of rock slopes, design and construction of other rock engineering projects in the distribution area of silty slates.

Key words: rock mechanics, silty slate, uniaxial compression test, Brazilian splitting test, mechanical property, anisotropy

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[2] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[3] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[4] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[5] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[6] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[7] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[8] 徐杰, 周建, 罗凌晖, 余良贵, . 高岭-蒙脱混合黏土渗透各向异性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
[9] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[10] 范运辉, 朱其志, 倪涛, 张坤, 张振南, . 基于弹性张量离散化的脆延转变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 181-188.
[11] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[12] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[13] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[14] 王冲, 胡大伟, 任金明, 周辉, 卢景景, 刘传新, . 侵蚀性环境对地下结构渗透和力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3457-3464.
[15] 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, 许江, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 严召松, . 3D-DIC系统在岩石力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3263-3273.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!