›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2193-2202.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1883

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于RFPA3D和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸边坡稳定性分析

杨 莹1,徐奴文1,李 韬1,戴 峰1,樊义林2,徐 剑2,李 彪1   

  1. 1. 四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065;2. 中国长江三峡集团公司,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-14 出版日期:2018-06-11 发布日期:2018-07-03
  • 通讯作者: 徐奴文,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事微震监测技术与工程灾害方面的研究工作。E-mail: xunuwen@scu.edu.cn E-mail:youngfyou@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨莹,女,1993年生,硕士,主要从事边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(No.2015CB057903);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51374149);教育部新世纪优秀人才(No.NCET-13-0382)。

Stability analysis of left bank rock slope at Baihetan hydropower station based on RFPA3D software and microseismic monitoring

YANG Ying1, XU Nu-wen1, LI Tao1, DAI Feng1, FAN Yi-lin2, XU Jian2, LI Biao1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 2. China Three Gorges Corporation, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2016-09-14 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) (2015CB057903), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374149) and the New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education (NCET-13-0382).

摘要: 白鹤滩水电站左岸边坡受缓倾角软弱面及NW向断层影响,施工、运行期的边坡稳定性问题尤为重要。为研究左岸边坡在开挖卸荷过程中应力场、位移场分布规律,揭示岩体内部破坏失稳机制,利用RFPA3D(realistic failure process analysis)软件以拱轴线剖面为例建立准三维数值模型,再现坝基边坡岩体裂隙萌生、发育、扩展直至贯通的渐进损伤破坏过程。结合左岸边坡开挖卸荷及应力调整过程中的微震活动演化特征,圈定工程边坡潜在危险区域,探讨可能的失稳破坏模式。分析表明:基于离心加载法计算得到工程边坡开挖后安全系数为1.33;边坡表层区域受缓倾角错动带控制,变形破坏最为明显,以小范围楔形体滑移为主。该研究结果可为白鹤滩水电站坝基边坡后期施工提供依据,对于类似岩质边坡工程施工具有一定的指导作用。

关键词: 岩石边坡, 微震监测, 稳定性, 数值模拟, 白鹤滩水电站

Abstract: The stability of the left bank slope at Baihetan hydropower station is especially important in the construction and operation periods, due to the influences of the dislocation interfaces with a slightly-inclined angle and NW directional faults. In this study, the quasi-three-dimensional numerical model was established by using the realistic failure process analysis (RFPA3D) software with the arch axis profile as an example. Then the stress distribution field and displacement field of the left bank slope were studied during excavation unloading process, and the rock failure mechanism was revealed. In addition, this study analysed the initiation, propagation, extension and interaction mechanisms of microcracks during the progressive failure process. By combining with the distribution of microseismic events during excavation unloading and stress adjustment on the left bank slope, the potentially dangerous parts of the engineering were delineated, and the possible failure modes of the slope were explored. The results showed that the safety factor of the slope after excavation was 1.33 calculated with the centrifuge loading method. It was found that the most obvious deformation and failure of the slope surface were controlled by the inclined dislocation interfaces. Meanwhile, the wedge-shaped sliding within a small scale played a dominant role in the damaged zone. This study provides references for the later construction of the left bank slope and practical guidance for constructing similar rock slopes.

Key words: rock slope, microseismic monitoring, stability, numerical simulation, Baihetan hydropower station

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457,TV 741

[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[7] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[8] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[9] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[10] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[11] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[12] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[13] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[14] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[15] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!