›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2211-2218.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2174

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GSI值量化和修正方法的岩体力学参数确定

姜光成1, 2,胡乃联1,洪根意2,李国清1,方京珍3   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083;2. 金策工业综合大学 矿业学院,朝鲜 平壤 999093; 3. 咸兴化工综合大学 信息交流中心,朝鲜 平壤 999093
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-13 出版日期:2018-06-11 发布日期:2018-07-03
  • 作者简介:姜光成,男,1977年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩体力学、安全工程和采矿工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点科技发展计划(No.2012BAB01B04);高海拔矿山的安全采矿技术研究。

Determination of rock mass mechanical parameters based on quantification and correction method of GSI value

KANG Kwang-song1, 2, HU Nai-lian1, HONG Gun-yi2, LI Guo-qing1, PANG Gyong-jin3   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Mining Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang 999093, DPR of Korea; 3. Information Technology Exchange Center, Hamhung University of Chemical Industry, Pyongyang 999093, DPR of Korea
  • Received:2016-09-13 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key Technology R & D Program (2012BAB01B04) and the Study on Key Technologies of Mining Safety Assurance for High-altitude Mine.

摘要: 为了准确确定岩体力学参数,通过综合分析多种地质强度指标(GSI)量化方法,提出了一种改进的GSI值量化和修正方法。首先,利用测线法估算结构面平均间距(d)和岩体块度指数(RBI)的改进型岩体块度率(RBR),根据岩体三维结构面网络,获得岩体体积节理数(Jv)和岩体结构等级(SR),然后采用上述参数和结构表面条件(SCR)及结构表面特性参数(Jc)进行了GSI值的定量化处理。为了克服GSI体系的缺点,考虑结构面产状和地下水对岩体力学性质的影响,提出了GSI值的修正方法和公式。以某铅锌矿体的矿岩体为例,根据改进的GSI值量化和修正方法及Hoek-Brown强度准则来确定矿岩体力学参数,通过与原位变形试验的对比分析,验证了该方法的精确性和可行性。该方法为从室内岩石力学试验合理地获取节理岩体力学参数提供了理论及实现的依据。

关键词: 岩体力学参数, 地质强度指标量化, 修正方法, Hoek-Brown强度准则

Abstract: To accurately determine mechanical parameters of the rock mass, an improved method for the quantification and correction of GSI value was proposed on the basis of the comprehensive analysis on some quantification methods of GSI value. Firstly, by using the scan line method, this study obtained the average spacing of joints (d) and rock mass block rating (RBR) which was a new quantitative factor based on rock mass block index (RBI). The volumetric joint count of rock mass (Jv) and rock mass structure rating (SR) were acquired according to the three-dimensional (3D) joint networks of the rock mass. Then GSI values of rock mass were quantified by utilising these above parameters, surface condition rating (SCR) and the joint condition factor (Jc). To overcome the drawbacks of GSI system, the correction method and formula of GSI value were established by considering the effects of joint orientation and groundwater on the mechanical parameters of rock mass. The established method was applied in a lead-zinc mine as an example. According to the new quantification and correction method of GSI value and Hoek-Brown strength criterion, the mechanical parameters of the ore body, hanging wall rock and footwall rock were determined. The accuracy and the feasibility of this method were verified by the comparative analysis with in-situ deformation tests. This study provides the theoretical and practical basis to acquire mechanical parameters of jointed rock mass based on rock mechanical tests in the laboratory.

Key words: rock mass mechanical parameters, quantification of geological strength index (GSI), correction method, Hoek-Brown strength criterion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 吴顺川, 姜日华, 张诗淮, 张 敏, . 修正Hoek-Brown强度准则在钻孔稳定性 分析中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 1-13.
[2] 周兴涛,盛 谦,崔 臻,朱泽奇,胡之锋,马亚丽娜, . 基于C2阶连续函数的广义Hoek-Brown强度准则屈服面与塑性势面棱角圆化方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 477-487.
[3] 马林建,阳 发,王明洋,李 増,. 考虑应变率效应的广义Hoek-Brown动态强度准则[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 27-32.
[4] 江 贝,李术才,王 琦,王富奇,张若祥,. 基于上限法的深部大断面回采巷道顶板锚索设计方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2351-2354.
[5] 王国安 ,马林建 ,刘新宇 ,易其康 ,高 磊,. 考虑中间主应力Hoek-Brown强度准则及其适用性[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2291-2297.
[6] 衡 帅 ,杨春和 ,张保平 ,郭印同 ,王 磊 ,魏元龙,. 页岩各向异性特征的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 609-616.
[7] 雷 勇,刘 泽. 基于H-B准则的公路桥梁桩基嵌岩深度计算[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 457-462.
[8] 王 琦 ,王洪涛 ,李术才 ,王德超 ,江 贝 ,张红军 ,李为腾,. 大断面厚顶煤巷道顶板冒落破坏的上限分析[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 795-800.
[9] 李术才 ,王洪涛 ,王 琦 ,王德超 ,江 贝 ,杨为民 ,张红军 ,李为腾,. Hoek-Brown准则下预应力锚索锚固体破坏的极限分析[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 466-473.
[10] 张良刚,吴 立,徐昌茂,陈 剑. 基于模糊综合评判的Hoek-Brown强度准则修正及应用[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 88-93.
[11] 张立祥 ,罗 强 ,张 良 ,刘 钢 ,魏永权 ,翁骏祺,. 土压力传感器在硬土介质中的非线性响应分析[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3633-3640.
[12] 孙 闯,张向东,刘家顺. 基于Hoek-Brown强度准则的应变软化模型在隧道工程中的应用[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2954-2960.
[13] 李彦恒,冯 利,罗立平. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩体分级法在地下工程中的应用[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 201-204.
[14] 胡盛明 胡修文. 基于量化的GSI系统和Hoek-Brown 准则的岩体力学参数的估计[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 861-866.
[15] 闫长斌,李国权,陈东亮,刘振红,刘建磊. 基于岩体爆破累积损伤效应的 Hoek-Brown准则修正公式[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2951-2956.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!