›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1761-1766.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2407

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥皮存在时防渗墙与复合土工膜联接型式模型试验

李 波1,肖先波2,徐唐锦3,周 嵩3   

  1. 1. 长江科学院水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010;2. 湖州职业技术学院,浙江 湖州 313000; 3. 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司施工设计处,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-12 出版日期:2018-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 肖先波,男,1977年生,硕士,副教授,主要从事地基基础工程方面的研究。E-mail:xiaoxianbo@163.com E-mail:libo_auliso@126.com
  • 作者简介:李波,男,1982年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程和离心模型试验技术方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费(No. CKSF2017012/YT);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51308067);浙江省公益技术研究计划项目(LGF18E080004);湖州市自然科学资金项目(No. 2016GY19);广西重点实验室系统性研究项目(No. 2016ZDK011,No. 2014ZDK0010)。

Experiment on connecting form between cutoff wall and composite geomembrane of cofferdam with existing wall mud

LI Bo1, XIAO Xian-bo2, XU Tang-jin3, ZHOU Song3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China; 2. Huzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China; 3. Construction and Design Department, Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2016-10-12 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Central Research Institutes of Basic Research and Public Service Special Operations (CKSF2017012/YT), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308067), Zhejiang Public Welfare Technology Research Project (LGF18E080004), Huzhou Natural Science Fund Project (2016GY19) and the Systematic Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety (2016ZDK011, 2014ZDK0010).

摘要: 防渗墙与复合土工膜联合作为防渗体系已广泛用于围堰工程,但变形不协调易导致联接部位处土工膜的破坏。通过某围堰工程复合土工膜与防渗墙联接部位离心模型试验,模拟防渗墙泥皮及其厚度、堰体填料的沉降变形等,研究不同联接方式时复合土工膜应变的变化规律。试验结果表明:当联接部位处土工膜水平铺设时,土工膜紧靠防渗墙的部位尤其是泥皮范围以内将产生较大应变,当防渗墙与周围堰体的差异变形达到一定量时,土工膜产生拉裂破坏;当土工膜先竖向抬高一段距离后再水平铺设,水平铺设段的土工膜应变明显减小,且随着与防渗墙的距离越远,土工膜应变越小。防渗墙泥皮的存在可有效缓解土工膜局部受力。

关键词: 围堰, 离心模型试验, 复合土工膜, 应变, 防渗墙, 泥皮

Abstract: The combination of cutoff wall and composite geomembrane is usually used as the imperious system recent years. The uncoordinated deformation between the cutoff wall and the fillings will cause the composite geomembrane cracks. The connecting form between cutoff wall and composite geomembrane is studied through geotechnical centrifuge tests. Four model tests considering the cutoff wall, wall mud, the backfilled materials and the connecting form are performed to investigate the variation of the strain of the composite membrane. When the geomembrane is laid horizontally on the top level of the cutoff wall, it is seriously strengthened at the connection near the cutoff wall, and the geomembrane is broken down when the differential settlement increases to a certain value. When the geomembrane is first laid vertically above the cutoff wall and then horizontally extended outward, the tensile strain of geomembrane is less at the connection. The longer the distance to the connection point, the less the strain. The existence of wall mud can effectively alleviate the local strain of the geomembrane.

Key words: cofferdam, centrifugal model test, composite geomembrane, strain, cutoff wall, mud

中图分类号: 

  • TV 223.4

[1] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[4] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[5] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[6] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[7] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[8] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[9] 李佳龙, 李钢, 于龙. 隔离非线性平面应变单元模型及其 在Drucker-Prager模型中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[10] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[11] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[12] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[13] 周恩全, 宗之鑫, 王琼, 陆建飞, 左熹. 橡胶-粉土轻质混合土中管道动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[14] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[15] 郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!