›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3246-3252.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2524

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用

周 勇1, 2, 3,朱亚薇1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730050; 2. 兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730050;3. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-26 出版日期:2018-09-11 发布日期:2018-10-08
  • 作者简介:周勇,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事深基坑开挖支护和边坡加固方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51568042);教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(No. IRT_17R51)

Interaction between pile-anchor supporting structure and soil in deep excavation

ZHOU Yong1,2,3, ZHU Ya-wei1,2,3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
  • Received:2016-10-26 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China(51568042) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University(IRT_17R51).

摘要: 目前深基坑桩锚支护结构的研究已引起学者的高度关注,支护结构与土体之间协同工作的研究仍然是一个亟待深入研究的课题。以桩锚支护结构与土体相互作用体系为研究对象,考虑桩后土抗力与锚杆拉力共同作用,建立静力平衡方程,在前人总结的桩锚变形协调条件的基础上,对其进行改进,并与变形协调条件的其他3种算法对比。结果表明,改进的方法更能反映桩锚支护结构受力变形的实际情况,由此算得的锚杆设计拉力较其他方法算得的锚杆设计拉力偏大,这是因为克服了前述方法中忽略锚杆倾角、增大了锚杆的伸长量以及未考虑桩锚实际受力状态的缺点。结合工程实例,应用FLAC3D模拟的桩身内力与改进方法算得的桩身内力基本吻合,说明改进方法的优越性。

关键词: 桩锚结构, 深基坑, 变形协调, 内力, 结构变形

Abstract: The studies of pile-anchor supporting structure of deep foundation pits have aroused the attention of scholars, and the interaction between supporting structure and soil still needs to be further researched. We established the static equilibrium equation considering the combined action of soil resistance after the pile and anchor tensile. The pile anchor deformation compatibility condition is modified and compared with the other three algorithms of deformation compatibility condition. The results show that the improved method can reflect the actual situation of the pile anchor supporting structure deformation. The designed pulling force of anchor is larger than other methods of designed pulling force of anchor. To overcome the ignored obliquity of the anchor, the anchors' elongation is increased and the stress states are not considered. FLAC3D is used to simulate the pile body’s internal force. The calculated internal force of pile body by the modified method is consistent, indicating the advantage of the proposed method.

Key words: structure of pile-anchor, deep excavation, deformation coordination, internal force, structural deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU470.1

[1] 刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.
[2] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[3] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[4] 刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及 邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[5] 唐德琪, 俞 峰, 陈奕天, 刘念武, . 既有−新增排桩双层支挡结构开挖模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1039-1048.
[6] 李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[7] 曹文贵,谭建辉,胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[8] 崔 凯,王东华,谌文武,任晓峰,刘 建,杨 光,. 基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 498-506.
[9] 姜文雨, 刘 一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[10] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
[11] 贾金青,高军程,涂兵雄,张 磊,王海涛,高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[12] 尹 静,邓荣贵,王金梅,王园园,李凯甜,. 锚索抗滑桩内力计算的传递矩阵法[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3517-3523.
[13] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[14] 董曼曼,王亮清,葛云峰,王 聪. 考虑滑床复合倾斜岩体综合地基系数的抗滑桩受力特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3000-3008.
[15] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!