›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3229-3236.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2670

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥石流拦砂坝底扬压力分布及影响因素试验

陈兴长1,陈 慧1,游 勇2,柳金峰2   

  1. 1. 西南科技大学 环境与资源学院,四川 绵阳 621010;2. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-14 出版日期:2018-09-11 发布日期:2018-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 游勇,男,1964年生,硕士,研究员,主要从事山地灾害试验与防治工程研究。E-mail: yyong@imde.ac.cn E-mail:mygeotech@126.com
  • 作者简介:陈兴长,男,1970年生,博士,教授,主要从事泥石流灾害评价与防治方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 41372301);中国科学院STS项目(KFJ-EW-STS-094);国家科技支撑计划课题(2014BAL05B01)

Experiment on distribution and influence factors of uplift pressure acting on bottom of debris flow check dam

CHEN Xing-zhang1, CHEN Hui1, YOU Yong2, LIU Jin-feng2   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Resource, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China; 2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2016-11-14 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372301), the STS Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences(KFJ-EW-STS-094) and the National Key Technology R & D Program(2014BAL05B01).

摘要: 泥石流拦砂坝底的扬压力会抵消坝体的部分有效荷重,影响其抗倾覆稳定性。为了研究拦砂坝底扬压力的分布规律及其影响因素,设计制作了拦砂坝模型和扬压力采集系统,开展了不同沟床坡度和不同坝前堆积条件下的扬压力模拟试验。试验结果表明,扬压力自坝踵至坝趾不断减小,且与渗流距离呈线性关系,当坝前有堆积物时相关系数绝对值达到0.98以上;沟床坡度明显影响坝底扬压力的分布。随着沟床坡度的增加,扬压力不断减小,且对坝踵处扬压力的影响较坝趾处更大;坝底和坝前堆积物的渗透性对扬压力的影响也很显著,它们的渗透性越差,扬压力就越小;坝前堆积物的渗透性还显著影响扬压力的分布规律,渗透性越差,其分布规律性就越强。研究成果为深入研究泥石流拦砂坝底扬压力的作用过程和作用机制奠定了基础。

关键词: 扬压力, 渗透系数, 泥石流, 拦砂坝

Abstract: The uplift pressure acting on a bottom of debris flow check dam can counteract partial effective weight and reduce the overturning stability of the dam. To study the distribution laws and influence factors of uplift pressure, a check dam model and an acquisition system of uplift pressure were designed and produced. A series of simulation tests of uplift pressure was conducted based on different gully bed slopes and different accumulations in front of the dam heel. The experimental results show that the uplift pressure linearly decreases from dam heel to dam toe. When placing accumulations in front of the dam, the absolute values of correlation coefficients between the uplift pressure and the distance to dam heel exceed 0.98. The uplift pressure decreases with the increase of gully bed slope and the influence of the bed slop on the pressure at the dam heel is greater than that of the dam toe. The permeabilities of materials placed on gully bed and accumulations in front of the dam all have impacts on uplift pressure. The lower their permeabilities are, the lower the uplift pressure will be. The permeability of accumulation in front of the dam heel also has a marked impact on the distribution laws of uplift pressure; and the lower the permeability is, the more obvious the distribution laws are. These research results will be the basis of further study on process and mechanism of uplift pressure acting on a bottom of check dam.

Key words: uplift pressure, hydraulic conductivity, debris flow, check dams

中图分类号: 

  • TV 144

[1] 安笑, 潘华利, 欧国强, 孔玲, 李炳志, . 恒定渗流作用泥石流碎屑物质起动判别模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 115-122.
[2] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[4] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 杨玉玲, . 无机盐溶液作用下砂−膨润土竖向隔离屏障 材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 736-746.
[5] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[6] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
[7] 彭家奕, 张家发, 沈振中, 叶加兵, . 颗粒形状对粗粒土孔隙特征和渗透性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 592-600.
[8] 王刚, 韦林邑, 魏星, 张建民, . 压实黏土三轴压缩变形过程中的渗透性变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 32-38.
[9] 刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[10] 徐浩青, 周爱兆, 姜朋明, 刘顺青, 宋苗苗, 陈亮, . 不同砂−膨润土垂直防渗墙填筑土料的掺量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 424-430.
[11] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[12] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[13] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[14] 胡明鉴, 崔 翔, 王新志, 刘海峰, 杜 韦, . 细颗粒对钙质砂渗透性的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2925-2930.
[15] 李 贤, 汪时机, 何丙辉, 沈泰宇, . 土体适用MICP技术的渗透特性条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2956-2964.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!