›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 517-524.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.027

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性及系统可靠度的影响

郑 栋1, 2,李典庆1, 2,曹子君1, 2,方国光1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-26 出版日期:2017-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 曹子君,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险控制方面的研究。E-mail:zijuncao@whu.edu.cn E-mail:zhengdong227@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑栋,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险分析方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No. 51225903);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51329901,No. 51679174);湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目(No. 2014CFA001)

Effect of spatial variability on correlation between slope failure modes and system reliability of slope stability

ZHENG Dong1, 2, LI Dian-qing1, 2, CAO Zi-jun1, 2, PHOON Kok-kwang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Education Ministry, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2015-05-26 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (51225903), the Natural Science Foundation of China (51329901, 51679174) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2014CFA001).

摘要: 常用的计算失效模式间近似相关系数存在一定的误差,采用Pearson相关系数准确地表征边坡失效模式间相关性。基于近似相关系数和Pearson相关系数,研究了土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性、代表性失效模式数目、边坡系统失效概率上、下限3方面的影响。简要介绍了选取边坡代表性滑动面的风险聚类法以及系统失效概率上、下限的Ditlevsen双模界限公式。以单层和两层边坡为例研究了近似相关系数的适用性。结果表明:常用的近似相关系数不能考虑土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性的影响,而Pearson相关系数能够有效地反映土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性的影响。当土体参数空间变异性较弱时,近似相关系数与Pearson相关系数间差别明显,基于近似相关系数会选取过多的代表性滑动面,不能有效地反映边坡代表性破坏模式。此外,基于近似相关系数计算的边坡系统失效概率上限会超过1,系统失效概率上、下限范围很宽,使得系统失效概率上、下限失去了意义。相比之下,基于Pearson相关系数计算的边坡系统失效概率上、下限范围较窄,能够有效地反映系统失效概率变化情况。

关键词: 边坡, 空间变异性, 相关系数, 失效模式, 系统失效概率

Abstract: The commonly used approximation for evaluating the correlation coefficients between failure modes has a certain degree of error. This paper uses Pearson correlation coefficient to characterize the correlation between different slope failure mechanisms. Based on the correlation coefficients calculated from two different methods, this paper studies the effect of soil spatial variability on correlation coefficients between failure modes, the number of failure modes of a slope and the bimodal bounds of system failure probability. A brief introduction to risk aggregation method aiming at selecting representative slip surfaces, and Ditlevsen’s formulas for calculating bimodal bounds of system failure probability is presented. A single-layered and a two-layered slopes are studied to evaluate applicability of the approximation correlation coefficients. The results show that the commonly used approximation correlation coefficients cannot reflect the effect of soil spatial variability on correlation between failure modes, whereas the Pearson correlation coefficients can. When the spatial variability of soil properties is weak, there is large discrepancy between approximation correlation coefficients and Pearson correlation coefficients. Too many representative slip surfaces are selected and the representative failure modes cannot be reflected effectively based on approximate correlation coefficients. Furthermore, the upper-bound limit of system failure probability calculated by approximation correlation coefficients is probably greater than 1, and the bimodal bounds of system failure probability are too wide, all of these make system failure probability become meaningless. By contrast, the calculated bimodal bounds of system failure probability based on Pearson correlation coefficients are narrower, showing the changes of system failure probability effectively.

Key words: slope, spatial variability, correlation coefficient, failure mode, system failure probability

中图分类号: 

  • O 211.9

[1] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[2] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[3] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[4] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[5] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[6] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[7] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[8] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[9] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[10] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[11] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[14] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!