›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4025-4032.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0426

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

排水刚性桩群桩抗液化性能的振动台试验研究

杨耀辉1, 2, 3,陈育民2, 3,刘汉龙1, 2, 3, 4,李文闻2, 3,江 强2, 3, 5   

  1. 1. 新疆农业大学 水利与土木工程学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京210098;4. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 5. 江阴市人民政府重点工程建设办公室,江苏 江阴 214400
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-22 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈育民,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程相关的教学科研工作。E-mail:ymchenhhu@163.com E-mail:yangyaohui1905@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨耀辉,男,1990年生,博士研究生,从事抗液化排水刚性桩相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51379067,No. 51679072);国家自然科学基金重点国际(地区)合作研究项目(No. 51420102013);教育部创新团队发展计划(No. IRT_15R17)。

Investigation on liquefaction resistance performance of rigid-drainage pile groups by shaking table

YANG Yao-hui1, 2, 3, CHEN Yu-min2, 3, LIU Han-long1, 2, 3, 4, LI Wen-wen2, 3, JIANG Qiang2, 3, 5   

  1. 1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052 China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 5. Jiangyin Construction Project Management Office, Jiangyin, Jiangsu 214400, China
  • Received:2017-03-22 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379067,51679072), the Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51420105013) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_15R17).

摘要: 排水刚性桩是一种将竖向排水体与刚性桩相结合的新型抗液化处理措施。为研究排水刚性桩群桩的抗液化作用效果,开展了桩顶竖向荷载作用下排水刚性桩处理可液化地基的振动台试验研究,分析了地基土体的超孔压响应、加速度响应及桩顶结构的水平位移响应,并与未设置排水体的普通桩群桩工况进行对比。结果表明:加载开始后,排水桩桩身排水通道有大量超孔隙水排出,普通桩桩身没有排水现象。采用排水桩时超孔压比峰值比普通桩中减小12%,孔压消散稳定后超孔压比减小13%左右,排水桩桩身的排水通道对超孔压的消散作用集中在振动作用的前期。排水桩桩顶的侧向永久位移较普通桩桩顶侧向永久位移减小约27%。试样土体液化前,剪应力-应变滞回圈包络面积较大,土体呈现一定的剪胀特性。液化后,排水桩的剪应力-应变滞回圈的割线模量更大。上述试验结果均表明了排水刚性桩在抗液化方面的有效作用。

关键词: 排水刚性桩, 振动台试验, 群桩, 超孔隙水压力, 侧向永久位移

Abstract: The application of rigid-drainage pile, combining vertical drainage and rigid pile, is a new technology for mitigation of liquefaction. Shaking table tests were carried out to investigate the performance of the rigid-drainage pile against liquefaction. The response of excess pore water pressure, acceleration and lateral displacement of pile top were monitored and analyzed. The results indicated that the use of rigid-drainage pile was an effective method to mitigation of liquefaction. There was much water drainage from the drainage pile when the shaking motion was applied, yet no water drainage for the ordinary pile. The mean value of peaks of excess pore water pressure decreased 12% for the rigid-drainage pile comparing to the ordinary pile. The value of excess pore water pressure approximately decreased 13% when the excess pore water pressure became stability. The effect of drainage was mainly in the previous period of shaking. The lateral permanent displacement on pile top decreased 27% for rigid-drainage pile compared with ordinary pile. The liquefaction, shear-strain hysteresis loops at previous stage were more pronounced than that of post liquefaction stage. the secant modulus of rigid-drainage pile is larger than the ordinary pile. The results of the tests illustrated the effectiveness of rigid-drainage pile in mitigation of liquefaction.

Key words: rigid-drainage pile, shaking table test, pile groups, excess pore water pressure, lateral permanent displacement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[5] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[6] 范怡飞, 王建华, . 考虑桩靴贯入对邻近群桩效应影响的分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2360-2368.
[7] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[8] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[9] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[10] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[11] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[12] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[13] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[14] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[15] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!