›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 3969-3975.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0547

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

径向压缩下圆环砂岩样的力学特性研究

吴秋红1, 2,赵伏军3,李夕兵4,王世鸣5,王 斌3,周志华6   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学 南方煤矿瓦斯与顶板灾害预防控制安全生产重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201; 2. 湖南科技大学 煤矿安全开采技术湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201; 3. 湖南科技大学 资源环境与安全工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201;4. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083; 5. 湖南科技大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201;6. 湖南科技大学 机电工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-28 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 作者简介:吴秋红,男,1985年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩石力学与岩层控制方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51474103, No. 51674116, No. 51504092);国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0600706)

Mechanical properties of ring specimens of sandstone subjected to diametral compression

WU Qiu-hong1, 2, ZHAO Fu-jun3, LI Xi-bing4, WANG Shi-ming5, WANG Bin3, ZHOU Zhi-hua6   

  1. 1. Work Safety Key Lab on Prevention and Control of Gas and Roof Disasters for Southern Coal Mines, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe Mining Techniques of Coal Mines, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 3. School of Resources, Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 4. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 5. School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 6. School of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2017-03-28 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51474103, 51674116, 51504092) and the State Key Research Development Program of China(2016YFC0600706).

摘要: 为了研究径向压缩下圆环试样孔壁处的应力特征,利用厚度为34 mm,外径为50 mm的完整圆盘及不同内径(8~30 mm)的圆环砂岩试样,在巴西劈裂试验中测量孔壁的应变变化,分析试样的力学特性。试验结果表明:圆环试样的峰值载荷随着内径的增大而逐渐减少。圆盘和内径较小的圆环试样达到峰值载荷时出现了失稳破坏,载荷迅速跌落:当内径大于 16 mm,圆环试样达到峰值载荷后,载荷略有下降,但是试样并没有出现失稳破坏,而是持续压缩一定时间后才破裂。圆环最弱部位拉应力不是材料参数,而是一个结构参数,且随圆环内径而变化,基于弹性理论的Hobbs公式不能用于计算岩石抗拉强度。孔壁岩石的破裂只能是达到拉伸变形极限才会破裂,不能以拉伸应力作为破坏指标。研究结果为理解岩石在压拉组合下的力学特征提供了参考。

关键词: 岩石力学, 巴西劈裂试验, 圆环, 抗拉强度, 砂岩

Abstract: An experiment using the rings of 34 mm in thickness, 50 mm in external diameter, and 8-30 mm in internal diameter was designed via the ring test, to analyze the stress characteristics around the hole. Strain gauges were used to record the strain changing around the hole during the test, and the mechanical properties of specimens were studied. The results indicate that the peak load of the specimens decreases with the increase of internal diameter. Both the discs and ring specimens with relatively small internal diameters have abrupt failure when they reach the first peak load. However, when the diameter is greater than 16 mm, there is no clearly defined stress drop after the first peak stress, but a distinct stress drop after the second peak stress is reached. The stress at the weakest point in the ring specimen is a structural parameter rather than a material parameter, and it changes with different internal diameters. The Hobbs’ equation based on elastic mechanics may not be suitable for determining the tensile strength of rock. Rock specimen needs adequate tensile deformation to fail until it reaches the limit stress. The failure of the borehole in the rock may be evaluated by the tensile deformation instead of tensile strength. The results provide important reference for mechanical characteristics of rock under compression-tension stresses.

Key words: rock mechanics, Brazilian splitting test, ring, tensile strength, sandstone

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[3] 赵怡晴, 吴常贵, 金爱兵, 孙浩, . 热处理砂岩微观结构及力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 马亚丽娜, 周光新. 岩石材料抗拉强度与劈裂节理面形貌的 加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
[6] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[7] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[8] 李斌, 黄 达, 马文著, . 层理面特性对砂岩断裂力学行为的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 858-868.
[9] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[10] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[11] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[12] 杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透 特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[13] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[14] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[15] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!