›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 2227-2233.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.08.010

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

回填软土中管道上拔试验及上浮承载力研究

邱 里1,柴能斌2,朱 斌2,倪伟杰2,蒋 婕1   

  1. 1. 中国石油集团工程设计有限责任公司 西南分公司,四川 成都 610017;2. 浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-21 出版日期:2017-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:邱里,男,1978年生,学士,工程师,主要从事油气储运研究与设计工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中国石油集团工程设计有限公司科技项目“管道工程特殊地段应变设计和工程措施研究”(No. KY2011-19)。

Uplift tests and uplift resistance analysis of pipe segment in soft backfill clay

QIU Li1, CHAI Neng-bin2, ZHU Bin2, NI Wei-jie2, JIANG Jie1   

  1. 1. Southwest Company, China Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610017, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China sorry
  • Received:2015-09-21 Online:2017-08-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of China Petroleum Group Engineering Design Co. Ltd. “Research on Strain Based Design and Engineering Measures of Pipelines in Special Regions”(KY2011-19)。

摘要: 研发了一套足尺浅埋管道上拔试验装置,针对不同软土强度、管道埋深和加载方式的情况,较系统地研究了上拔过程中管-土相互作用、管周软土破坏模式、上浮承载力及其影响因素。试验结果表明:在管道上拔过程中,回填软土的变形主要由土块相对位置调整及块间间隙水的排出产生,这与均质软土中变形主要由固结导致明显不同;埋深管径比 1时,回填软土的破坏模式接近流动破坏,远小于规范建议的 3; 1时,建议采用Palmer方法计算长期荷载作用下回填软土的极限上浮承载力; 越大,则回填软土中管道的上浮承载力也越大;在其他条件一定时,回填软土中管道的上浮承载力基本随抗剪强度呈线性增长,由于地基固结速度明显较均质软土快,设计时可适当考虑土体强度恢复的影响。

关键词: 回填软土, 管道, 足尺上拔试验, 破坏模式, 上浮承载力

Abstract: A set of test devices were developed, and a series of full-scale uplift tests were carried out on a pipe segment buried in lumpy soft clay backfill. Focusing on the influence of shear strength of soil, depth-diameter ratio and loading mode, the pile-soil interaction, the failure mode and the uplift resistance were studied. The test results show that the deformation properties of lumpy soft clay backfill are different from uniform soft clay during uplifting. For the former, deformation is due to the position shift of soft clay blocks and the outflow of water in gaps between the blocks. For the latter, it is due to consolidation. When the depth-diameter ratio is equal to 1, the failure mode of lumpy soft clay backfill is more closed to ‘local’ flow-round. It is much less than DNV’s suggestion which is 3. It was suitable to use Palmer’s approach to calculate the uplift resistance of lumpy soft clay under long-term load if 1. The uplift resistance of pipeline in lumpy soft clay increases as the increase of and it is mainly linear increase with the increase of the shear strength. The consolidation rate of lumpy soft clay is much larger than uniform soft clay, so it may be taken into account of the effect of strength restoration of clay to the uplift resistance during design.

Key words: soft clay backfill, pipe segment, full-scale uplift tests, failure mode, uplift resistance

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[3] 周恩全, 宗之鑫, 王琼, 陆建飞, 左熹. 橡胶-粉土轻质混合土中管道动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[4] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[5] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[6] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[7] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[8] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[9] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[10] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[11] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[12] 张海廷, 杨林青, 郭芳, . 基于SBFEM的层状地基埋置管道动力 响应求解与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[13] 韩俊艳, 侯本伟, 钟紫蓝, 赵密, 李立云, 杜修力. 多点非一致激励下埋地管道多台阵振动台 试验方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2127-2139.
[14] 许 江, 瞿佳美, 刘义鑫, 彭守建, 王 威, 吴善康, . 循环剪切荷载作用下充填物对结构面 剪切特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[15] 李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张 彬, 张 嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究 采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!