›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1611-1618.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0821

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型

付海清1, 2,袁晓铭1,王 淼1   

  1. 1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 2. 山东省地震局,山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-26 出版日期:2018-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 袁晓铭,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究工作。E-mail:yxmiem@163.com E-mail:haiqing85@163.com
  • 作者简介:付海清,男,1985年生,博士,工程师,主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No. 2018A01);国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项 (No. 2016YFE0105500);山东省自然科学基金面上项目(No. ZR2014EEM014);广西高校科学技术研究项目(No. 2013YB100);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51508533);山东省地震局科研基金项目(No. JJ1801)。

An incremental model of pore pressure for saturated sand based on in-situ liquefaction test

FU Hai-qing1, 2, YUAN Xiao-ming1, WANG Miao1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 2. Shandong Earthquake Agency, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China
  • Received:2017-04-26 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2018A01); the Key Special Project of National Key R & D Plan, International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation (2016YFE0105500); Shandong Natural Science Foundation (ZR2014EEM014); Guangxi University Scientific Research Foundation(2013YB100); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508533) and the Scientific Research Fund of Shandong Earthquake Agency(JJ1801).

摘要: 采用现场液化试验,研究水平场地孔压增长模式,提出孔压增量计算模型。通过不同密实度砂土的液化试验,以加速度、埋深、砂土密实度等现场参数为指标构建孔压增量模型,发现现场和室内试验孔压增长模式的区别和联系,并验证该孔压模型的可靠性。研究结果表明:等幅循环荷载下,与现有动三轴等土单元试验的孔压增量随作用次数一直呈单调递减模式不同,现场试验孔压增量随作用次数呈现出先增大后减小的规律,中间存在阈值;通过参数分析和试验实例验证,构建的孔压增量计算模型,可更方便地用于随机荷载下水平场地的饱和砂土孔压计算。

关键词: 砂土液化, 现场试验, 孔压, 增量模型

Abstract: Through in-situ liquefaction tests under dynamic artificial loading, the pore pressure variation of saturated sand in level ground is measured, and an incremental model of predicting pore pressure is proposed. Using the results of in-situ testing in different cases, a new incremental model is established considering acceleration, buried depth, density of sand, common properties used to describe soil characteristics in-situ. The correlation and difference of response for pore pressure increase between in-situ test and laboratory test are also analyzed. Parameter analysis and validation through in-situ liquefaction tests indicate that the new model is reliable. The number-of-cycle effect by in-situ tests is different from the results obtained from laboratory tests. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Under uniform cyclic loading conditions, the variation of pore pressure increment in saturated sand in field is not monotonically decreasing with increasing numbers of cycles, but increasing at the beginning followed by decreasing after a specific number of cycles, which can be defined as a threshold number; (2) The proposed incremental model can also be used to predict pore pressure buildup of saturated sand under irregular loadings.

Key words: soil liquefaction, in-situ test, pore pressure, increment model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[4] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[5] 唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
[6] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[7] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[8] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[9] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[10] 莫振泽, 王梦恕, 李海波, 钱勇进, 罗跟东, 王辉, . 粉砂地层中浓泥土压盾构泥膜效应引起的 孔压变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2257-2263.
[11] 赵丁凤, 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 熊 浩, 周正龙, . 剪切-体积应变耦合的孔压增量模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1832-1840.
[12] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[13] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[14] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[15] 夏唐代, 郑晴晴, 陈秀良, . 基于累积动应力水平的间歇加载下超孔压预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!