软土地层浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流场解析研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0882

岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4377-4384.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0882

软土地层浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流场解析研究

张丙强^{1, 2}，王启云^{1, 2}，卢晓颖³

1. 福建工程学院土木工程学院，福建福州 350118；2. 福建工程学院地下工程福建省高校重点实验室，福建福州 350118； 3. 平潭综合实验区交通投资集团有限公司，福建平潭 350400

收稿日期:2017-05-05 出版日期:2018-12-11 发布日期:2018-12-31
作者简介:张丙强，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，主要从事道路与铁道工程方面的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金项目（No.2017J01671，2015J05090）；福建工程学院科研启动基金项目（No.GY-Z13118）

Analytical solution for non-Darcian seepage field of a shallow circular tunnel in soft soil

ZHANG Bing-qiang^1,2, WANG Qi-yun^1,2, LU Xiao-ying³

1. School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Underground Engineering, Fujian Province University, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China; 3. Transportation Investment Group of Pingtan Comprehensive Pilot Zone, Pingtan, Fujian 350400, China

Received:2017-05-05 Online:2018-12-11 Published:2018-12-31
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2017J01671, 2015J05090) and the Science Foundation of Fujian University of Technology(GY-Z13118).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 软土在低水力坡降下的渗流会偏离达西定律，即为非达西渗流模式。假设孔隙水渗透服从指数渗流模式，采用镜像法原理推导了浅埋单孔和双孔圆形隧道非达西渗流场的解析解。结合算例，对浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流解析解与达西渗流解析解进行了对比分析与验证，并对非达西渗流指数、隧道周围土体与衬砌渗流系数比值对隧道渗流场的影响进行了讨论。结果表明：非达西渗流指数、渗流系数比值对隧道渗流量和周围土体孔压均有较大的影响；随着渗流指数逐渐增大，土体内水头损失加快，隧道周围土体孔压及渗流量逐渐减小；随着土体与衬砌渗流系数比值逐渐增大，衬砌排水能力增强，隧道渗流量逐渐增大，隧道周围土体孔压减小更大。

关键词: 软土, 圆形隧道, 非达西渗流, 镜像法, 渗流解析解

Abstract: Flows of pore water in saturated soft soils would deviate from Darcy’s flow law under low hydraulic gradient, which is non Darcy seepage mode. Supposing that the velocity of flow is exponentially related to the hydraulic gradient, the analytical solutions of non-Darcy seepage field in shallow single-hole and double-hole circular tunnels are derived by using the principle of mirror method. The analytical solutions of non-Darcian seepage and Darcian seepage for shallow circular tunnels are compared and verified by case analysis. The influence of non-Darcy seepage index and the seepage coefficient ratio of soil to lining on tunnel seepage field is also discussed. The results show that the non-Darcy seepage index and the ratio of seepage coefficient have great influence on tunnel seepage and pore pressure of surrounding soil. With the increase of seepage index, the loss of water head in soil is accelerated, and the pore pressure and seepage flow around the tunnel are gradually reduced. With the increase of the ratio of seepage coefficient between soil and lining, the drainage capacity of lining is enhanced, the seepage flow of tunnel is gradually increased, and the pore pressure around the tunnel decreases more.

Key words: soft soil, circular tunnels, non-Darcian seepage, image method, analytical solution of seepage

中图分类号:

TU447

张丙强, 王启云, 卢晓颖, . 软土地层浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流场解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4377-4384.

ZHANG Bing-qiang, WANG Qi-yun, LU Xiao-ying, . Analytical solution for non-Darcian seepage field of a shallow circular tunnel in soft soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4377-4384.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[2]	张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[3]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[4]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[5]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[6]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[7]	叶观宝, 郑文强, 张振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[8]	刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[9]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[10]	张奎, 赵成刚, 李伟华. 海底软土层对海洋地基场地动力响应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2456-2468.
[11]	夏才初, 刘宇鹏, 吴福宝, 徐晨, 邓云纲, . 基于西原模型的圆形隧道黏弹-黏塑性解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1638-1648.
[12]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[13]	杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[14]	周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[15]	杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

软土地层浅埋圆形隧道非达西渗流场解析研究

Analytical solution for non-Darcian seepage field of a shallow circular tunnel in soft soil

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0