›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2713-2720.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.032

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国沿海地区软黏土压缩指数统计及与国外其他地区对比

高彦斌1,张松波1,葛潇楠2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 麻省大学阿默斯特分校 环境与土木工程系,马萨诸塞州 美国
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-20 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:高彦斌,男,1973年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事软土力学特性和软土工程的研究工作。

Comparisons of compression index of Chinese coastal soft clay and soils from foreign regions

GAO Yan-bin1, ZHANG Song-bo1, GE Xiao-nan2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003, USA
  • Received:2016-06-20 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05

摘要: 国内学者对我国沿海各地区软土的压缩指数与物理指标的相关性进行了详细的研究,但针对这些统计关系的整体分析以及与国外研究成果的对比仍然比较缺乏。通过对比国外不同地区的压缩指数与液限(8个)、压缩指数与初始孔隙比(7个)、压缩指数与天然含水率(6个)的关系式,发现压缩指数与天然含水率之间的相关性较好,并给出了一个适用范围更广的统计关系。收集我国沿海多个地区的压缩指数与天然含水率统计关系式以及试验数据,对比发现压缩指数与天然含水率的线性关系整体上可以分为两类:南方地区(深圳、广州)具有较低的斜率,约为0.008,与国外的0.01较为接近;而北方地区(天津、连云港、上海)具有较大斜率,约为0.02。这可能与土的结构性有关。还就土样质量对压缩指数与天然含水率统计关系的影响以及Lambe和Whitman提出压缩比与天然含水率统计关系的适用性进行了评价。

关键词: 软黏土, 压缩指数, 物理指标, 统计关系, 含水率

Abstract: The relationships between compression index Cc and physical parameters of soft soil have been studied by many researchers. However, a comprehensive summarization of all these empirical relationships is missing. Eight Empirical relationships of Cc with liquid limit, seven relationships of void ratio e0 and six relationships of natural water content wn from different regions in the world are summairized in this paper. It is found that these Cc-wn relationshps have very similair slopes (about 0.01). Therefore, a general relationship is proposed. The Cc-wn empirical relationships from different Chinese costal areas are compared, and some test data are also collected. It is shown that these Cc-wn relationships can be divided into two categories and their empirical relationships are presented repectively. Southern areas such as Guangzhou, Shenzhen have soils with smaller slope (about 0.008) which is close to the value of 0.01 of soils from foreign regions. Northern areas such as Tianjin, Shanghai, Lianyungang have soils with much larger slope (about 0.02). This difference may relate to the soil structure. This article also evaluates the influence of the soil disturbance on the Cc-wn statistical relationship and discusses the applicability of compression ratio CR with wn relationship provided by Lambe and Whitman for soft soils.

Key words: soft clay, compression index, physical parameters, statistics relationship, water content

中图分类号: 

  • TU 447

[1] 杨凯旋, 侯天顺. 击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的 影响规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1971-1982.
[2] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[3] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[4] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[5] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[6] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[7] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[8] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[9] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[10] 闫亚景, 闫永帅, 赵贵章, 张泰丽, 孙强, . 基于高密度电法的天然边坡水分运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2807-2814.
[11] 罗庆姿, 陈晓平, 袁炳祥, 冯德銮, . 柔性侧限条件下软土的变形特性及固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2264-2274.
[12] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同胶结度断层泥强度参数与含水率关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1657-1662.
[13] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[14] 夏唐代, 郑晴晴, 陈秀良, . 基于累积动应力水平的间歇加载下超孔压预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
[15] 冯凌云, 朱斌, 代加林, 孔德琼, . 深海管道水平向管−土相互作用 大变形连续极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!