›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3505-3514.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0982

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

边坡稳定性分析条分法的细胞自动机求解和应用

陈文胜,谢亚军,刘龙武,曾红春   

  1. 长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-22 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
  • 作者简介:陈文胜,男,1966年生,博士,教授,研究员,主要从事岩土工程教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51778067,No. 51279018)

Cellular automata solution for slope stability analysis by slices model and its application

CHEN Wen-sheng, XIE Ya-jun, LIU Long-wu, ZENG Hong-chun   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2017-08-22 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778067, 51279018).

摘要: 边坡稳定性分析的条分法如瑞典条分法、毕肖普条分法等,现仍是边坡分析和评估的主要方法。由于刚体条分的假定,如何简化和计算条间力,是各种方法里最为关键的问题。合理的简化成为不同方法的求解途径,也是影响其计算结果差别的主要和直接的原因。然而,带着这一简化的遗憾,各种条分法仍是我们目前分析边坡稳定性的主要手段。针对研究现状,尝试更合理求解条分法条间力的求解方法,对条块刚性接触的条间力,不做简化,而引入细胞自动机求解方法,通过迭代得到条间力的解,从而使超静定的边坡条分力学模型,得到了唯一收敛的静定解。编制了相应的程序软件CASlope。结果表明,这一求解途径是可行的,所求解的结果是合理的。

关键词: 边坡, 条分法, 细胞自动机, 弹簧模型

Abstract: Slices models for slope stability analysis, such as Sweden simplified method, Bishop simplified method, etc, are still the mainstream methods of slope analysis and evaluation. However, due to the rigid body assumption, how to simplify and calculate the forces between rigid slices is the most critical problem for slices model. A reasonable simplified condition will result in a solving approach to different methods, and also is the main and direct reason that affects the difference of calculation results. However, even a simplified condition must be given, slices methods are still important means of the analysis of slope stability at present. Considering the fact existing, this paper attempts to present a more reasonable approach to calculate the force between slices. In this study, the forces between slices will not be simplified by adopting the cellular automata method, and the forces will be obtained by an iterative solution so that the only statically determinate convergent solution is obtained for the statically indeterminate slope slices model. The corresponding program software CASlope is developed. Example results show that this approach is feasible and the results are reasonable.

Key words: slope, slices analysis method, cellular automata, spring model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43

[1] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[2] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[3] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[4] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[5] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[6] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[7] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[8] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[9] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[10] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[11] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[14] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!