岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 207-215.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1089

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐岩单轴蠕变声发射特征及损伤演化研究

曾 寅1, 2,刘建锋1, 2,周志威3,吴 池1, 2,李志成1, 2   

  1. 1. 四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065;2. 四川大学 水利水电学院,四川 成都 610065; 3. 四川凉山水洛河电力开发有限公司,四川 成都 610000
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-01 出版日期:2019-01-11 发布日期:2019-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 刘建锋,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的研究。E-mail: liujf@scu.edu.cn E-mail: 1026579434@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曾寅,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学试验研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51874202);四川省青年基金(No. 2017JQ0003)。

Creep acoustic emission and damage evolution of salt rock under uniaxial compression

ZENG Yin1, 2, LIU Jian-feng1, 2, ZHOU Zhi-wei3, WU Chi1, 2, LI Zhi-cheng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 2. College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 3. Sichuan Liangshan Shuiluohe River Electric Power Development Co. Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China
  • Received:2017-06-01 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51874202) and the Sichuan Youth Fund (2017JQ0003).

摘要: 为研究盐岩在长历时蠕变过程的声发射特征规律与损伤演化过程,采用四川大学大型程控流变仪和PAC Sensor- highway II型声发射监测仪器对盐岩进行了为期约1 a的单轴蠕变声发射试验,分析了盐岩长历时蠕变过程应变规律与声发射试验结果,探讨了盐岩全蠕变损伤演化过程。试验结果表明,盐岩在为期约1 a的蠕变时间内经历了初始衰减蠕变阶段、稳态蠕变阶段、加速蠕变阶段,其中稳态蠕变速率基本维持在6×10?5 d?1;盐岩全蠕变过程声发射各特征参数规律与蠕变应变趋势基本一致,呈活跃-平静-活跃趋势,同时根据声发射参数特征曲线可以预判盐岩进入加速蠕变阶段在300 d之时,比由应变曲线(320 d)判断更为提前,为储气库工程建设提供室内试验依据;根据声发射时空演化特征揭示了盐岩长历时蠕变损伤破坏路径是从端部-中部-整部的形式;基于声发射振铃计数特征参数计算的损伤变量变化趋势与蠕变应变趋势一致,而盐岩蠕变全过程声发射分形维数呈下降-波动-上升的趋势,表征声发射经历了一个从无序到有序再到无序的过程,且与蠕变速率曲线变化一致,分形维数的拐点与声发射提前预判加速蠕变拐点节点相一致,分形维数变化与损伤变量率变化趋势基本一致,进一步分析表明声发射分形维数值基本在2上下波动,损伤变量率基本稳定在0.002 d?1周围。

关键词: 盐岩, 单轴, 蠕变, 声发射, 分形维数, 损伤变量

Abstract: To investigate the acoustic emission (AE) characteristics and damage evolution process of salt rock during the long creep process, uniaxial creep AE tests were carried out by using a large-scale programmed rheometer and the PAC Sensor-highway II AE monitoring instrument at Sichuan University. The strain law and AE test results of the long creep process of salt rock were analysed, and the evolution process of the whole creep damage was discussed in detail. The results show that the salt rock undergoes an initial attenuation creep stage, a steady creep stage and an accelerated creep stage during the creep period of about one year, in which the steady creep rate is basically maintained at 6×10-5 d-1. The variation of characteristic parameters of AE in the whole creep process is basically consistent with the creep strain trend, showing an "active-quiet-active" trend. According to the AE parameter characteristic curve, the salt rock can be predicted to begin the accelerated creep stage at 300 days, and it is more accurate than the creep strain trend line, which provides experimental fundamentals for the construction of the gas storage. According to the characteristics of temporal and spatial evolution of AE, the damage path of the long-duration creep damage of the salt rock is from the form of "end-central-whole part". The change trend of the damage variable based on the AE ringing counts is consistent with the creep strain trend. Moreover, the fractal dimension of AE in the whole process of the salt rock shows a "decreasing-fluctuating-rising" trend, which indicates that the AE undergoes a process from disorder to order and then to disorder, and changes with the creep rate curve consistent. The inflection point of fractal dimension is consistent with that of AE in predicting an accelerated creep inflection point, and further analysis shows that the fractal dimension of AE is basically fluctuating up and down at the value of 2. The damage variable rate is basically stable at around 0.002 d-1.

Key words: salt rock, uniaxial, creep, acoustic emission, fractal dimension, damage variable

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱 演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[3] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[4] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[5] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[6] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[7] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[8] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[9] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[10] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[11] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[12] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[13] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[14] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[15] 李宗泽, 姜德义, 范金洋, 陈 结, 刘 伟, 吴 斐, 杜 超, 康燕飞. 盐岩三轴间隔疲劳特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!