›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 3179-3186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.11.013

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高埋深储层膏质泥岩蠕变力学特性试验研究

张 玉,王亚玲, 张晓东,李 静,栾雅琳   

  1. 中国石油大学(华东)储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-29 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:张玉,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51409261);青岛市应用基础研究计划项目(No. 17-1-1-33-jch);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(No. 16CX05002A);水能资源利用关键技术湖南省重点实验室开放研究基金项目(No. PKLHD201601);中国石油大学(华东)教学改革项目(No. QN201614)。

Experimental study of creep behaviour of gypsum mudstone in a deep reservoir

ZHANG Yu, WANG Ya-ling, ZHANG Xiao-dong, LI Jing, LUAN Ya-lin   

  1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
  • Received:2016-02-29 Online:2017-11-10 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51409261), the Applied Basic Research Programs of Qingdao (17-1-1-33-jch), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (16CX05002A), the Open Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Hydropower Development Key Technology (PKLHD201601) and the Teaching Reform Project of China University of Petroleum (East China) (QN201614).

摘要: 泥岩作为油气储层常见复杂介质,深部高温、高压环境下蠕变力学特性异常复杂,是引起套管损伤破坏的重要因素。以深部油气藏工程含膏质泥岩为研究对象;分别开展了温度为130 ℃、围压为30 MPa作用下三轴压缩和不同应力水平的三轴蠕变试验,结果表明,该泥岩呈非均质性不明显、具有较大塑性压缩和延性扩容变形、峰值强度略低等软岩力学特性;且轴向和侧向峰值应变达1.5%,峰值强度为74 MPa。泥岩力学特性表现出明显的时间效应,蠕变应力阀值较低;应力和持时对蠕变特性存在显著影响,低应力、长时间作用下泥岩亦呈现显著的稳态蠕变和加速蠕变破坏;且加速蠕变起始时间随应力增加呈指数降低关系;探讨了泥岩强度损伤和加速蠕变特性,认为泥岩内部蠕变损伤变量可用指数函数予以描述,且加速蠕变变形为应力与时间的二元指数函数。相关成果旨在为深部泥岩油气藏套管工程长期稳定分析及蠕变模型构建提供可靠的依据。

关键词: 岩石力学, 高埋深储层, 膏质泥岩, 三轴蠕变试验, 加速蠕变破坏

Abstract: Mudstone, as a host rock medium widely distributed in oil and gas reservoirs, exhibits unusually complicated creep behaviour under conditions of high temperature and high pressure. Moreover, this creep behaviour is an important factor causing the failure of casing. In this study, gypsum mudstone from a deep oil and gas reservoir was chosen to investigate the creep characteristic. Triaxial compression tests and triaxial creep tests were conducted to characterise the instantaneous mechanical behaviours of mudstone at 130℃ temperature and with 30 MPa confining pressure. It was found that the mudstone presented characteristics of soft rock, such as no obvious heterogeneity, great plastic compression and ductility dilation strain, and low peak strength. Both axial and lateral peak strains reached more than 1.5%, with a corresponding peak strength of 74 MPa. The mudstone showed obvious time-dependent behaviour in mechanical properties, and had a low creep stress threshold. Stress and duration had significant effects on creep characteristics. Under a long-term low stress, the mudstone also exhibited clearly a steady-state creep and accelerated creep failure, furthermore, the start time of acceleration creep decreased exponentially with the increase of stress. The damage and accelerating creep characteristics of mudstone were discussed as well. It is suggested that the creep damage variable in mudstone can be represented as an exponential function, and the creep deformation is the binary exponential function of stress and time. Therefore, the results provide a valuable reference for the establishment of rock creep model and the analysis of long-term stability in deep oil and gas reservoir engineering.

Key words: rock mechanics, high buried deep reservoir, gypsum mudstone, triaxial creep tests, accelerated creep behaviour

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[4] 王立业, 周凤玺, 秦虎, . 饱和盐渍土分数阶蠕变模型及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 543-551.
[5] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[6] 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, 许江, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 严召松, . 3D-DIC系统在岩石力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3263-3273.
[7] 张艳博, 梁鹏, 孙林, 田宝柱, 姚旭龙, 刘祥鑫, . 单轴压缩下饱水花岗岩破裂过程声发射 频谱特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2497-2506.
[8] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[9] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[10] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[11] 苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[12] 曹 梦, 叶剑红, . 中国南海钙质砂蠕变-应力-时间四参数数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1771-1777.
[13] 王 宇, 艾 芊, 李建林, 邓华锋, . 考虑不同影响因素的砂岩损伤特征 及其卸荷破坏细观特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1341-1350.
[14] 李晓照, 戚承志, 邵珠山, 屈小磊, . 基于细观力学脆性岩石剪切特性演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1358-1367.
[15] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 雷 江, 于洪丹, 邢天海, 郑有雷, 贾晓东, . 并联型软岩温度-渗流-应力耦合三轴流变仪的研制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1213-1220.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!