›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 571-579.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1136

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膨胀土初始破损与湿干交替耦合作用下的力学行为

毛 新1,汪时机1,程明书1,陈正汉2,王晓琪1   

  1. 1. 西南大学 工程技术学院,重庆 400715;2. 后勤工程学院 建筑工程系,重庆 400041
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-06 出版日期:2018-02-10 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 汪时机,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学方面的教学和研究。E-mail: shjwang@swu.edu.cn E-mail:xmaoswu@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:毛新,男,1992年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目资助(No. 11572262);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No. XDJK2015C018,No. XDJK2016B006)。

Mechanical behavior of expansive soil under initial damage and wetting-drying cycles

MAO Xin1, WANG Shi-ji1, CHENG Ming-shu1, CHEN Zheng-han2, WANG Xiao-qi1   

  1. 1. College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. Department of Architectural Engineering, Logistical Engineering University of PLA, Chongqing 400041, China
  • Received:2017-06-06 Online:2018-02-10 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11572262) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(XDJK2015C018, XDJK2016B006).

摘要: 为研究不同初始破损程度、不同干湿循环次数及两者耦合工况对膨胀土孔洞及裂隙发育、演化规律的影响,以及相应的土体变形、力学行为,以合肥膨胀土为研究对象,对制备的不同初始破损程度(圆柱孔直径分别为0、2.5、5 mm)的3组20个试样进行干湿循环试验及三轴剪切试验(控制吸力为50 kPa,有效围压分别为100、200、400 kPa)。并解释了孔洞-裂隙的产生及发育新机制。结果表明:干湿循环次数为0时,一定程度的初始破损会提高土体的强度;与常规认识不同,干湿循环次数为1~2次时,初始破损的存在会诱导土体裂隙开裂的方向和贯通模式,形成的结构块较无破损土体形成的更完整,因而具有相对于无初始破损土体更高的强度;干湿循环次数为3次时,裂隙完全扩展,土体结构性被严重破坏,有无初始破损的土体强度趋于一致;孔洞-裂隙的演化机制是:脱湿-增湿过程中产生的水力梯度使土体具有不同的软硬性质和胀缩变形,产生的拉压应力在微裂纹、尖端形成应力集中而开裂,更易与具有的初始孔洞破损联合、交汇、贯通,萌生的裂隙增大了水汽交换界面面积,进一步平衡拉压应力而最终完全碎裂。研究可为普遍存在初始破损的膨胀土工程研究提供新的思路。

关键词: 膨胀土, 干湿循环, 裂隙, 破损, 力学性能

Abstract: To study different degrees of initial damage, different drying-wetting cycles and the coupled effects on the development and evolution of pore and fissure of expansive soil, drying-wetting cycle tests and triaxial shear tests (suction is 50 kPa, net confining pressure is 100, 200, 400 kPa, respectively) are conducted on Hefei expansive soil specimens for 3 groups with different initial degrees of damage (the diameter of the cylindrical hole is 0, 2.5 and 5 mm, respectively). If there is no drying-wetting cycle, a certain extent of initial damage can increase soil strength. If drying-wetting cycle is 1-2 times, the initial damage contributes to outcome of crack direction and penetration mode, forming intact block structure that has higher strength than that of the soil without initial damage. If drying-wetting cycle is 3 times, crack is able to expand completely and the strength of the soil with different degrees of initial damage becomes consistent with the soil without initial damage. The evolution mechanism of soil pore-fissure is that: the different strength and shrinkage deformation induced by hydraulic gradient when subjected to drying-wetting process will produce tension and compression stress in micro-crack tips and tear the tips up, which makes the tips combine with the initial hole damage, causing intersection and transfixion of the damage. Furthermore, the fracture is able to develop due to the increased water vapor exchange interface area in the fracture to further balance the compressive stress. The research provides a new insight for the study of expansive soil engineering with initial damage.

Key words: expansive soil, drying-wetting cycle, fissure, damage, mechanical properties

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[3] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[4] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[5] 高雪峰, 张延军, 黄奕斌, 赵熠, 倪金, 马静晨. 花岗岩粗糙单裂隙对流换热特性的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1761-1769.
[6] 夏才初, 王岳嵩, 郑金龙, 吕志涛. 裂隙岩体不均匀冻胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1161-1168.
[7] 侯晓萍, 陈胜宏. 采用复合单元法模拟裂隙多孔介质变饱和流动[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1437-1446.
[8] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[9] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
[10] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[11] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[12] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[13] 肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[14] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[15] 支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!