›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 1037-1046.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1189

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑固结历史的结构性软土路基沉降数值模拟

宋 晶1,叶冠林1,徐永福1,孙德安2   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学 土木工程系,上海 200240;2. 上海大学 土木工程系,上海 200444
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-11 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 叶冠林,男,1975年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学基础理论与岩土数值计算方面的研究工作。E-mail: ygl@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:sjnobellor@163.com
  • 作者简介:宋晶,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要研究华东地区软土层力学特性和道路工程。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.41630633)

Numerical simulation of long-term settlement of structural soft soil subgrade considering consolidation history

SONG Jing1, YE Guan-lin1, XU Yong-fu1, SUN De-an2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Received:2017-06-11 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41630633).

摘要: 沿海地区广泛分布结构性海相软土,给公路运营带来很多安全隐患。通过研究某高速公路江苏段,提出了基于Shanghai软土本构模型,利用现有路基下软土的固结试验结果反推施工前原状土本构参数取值的方法。通过水-土耦合有限元程序模拟路基长期沉降,分析了土层结构性、渗透性、软土层厚度对路基沉降发展的影响。结果表明,土层初始结构性越强,加载阶段孔隙累积值越大,施工沉降越大;工后土体结构性变化越大,土层压缩越明显。土体渗透性影响路基沉降,渗透性越小,累积孔压越大,沉降时间越长,总沉降量与工后沉降占比越大。软土层厚度影响路基沉降发展,土层越厚,路基最终沉降越大,沉降稳定时间越长。

关键词: 本构模型, 路基沉降, 结构性软土, 固结历史

Abstract: Structural marine soft soil layer is widely distributed in coastal region, which brings lots of potential disasters. Soft soil subgrade in the Jiangsu provincial section of an expressway is studied in this research. A new method, to obtain constitutive parameters of undisturbed soil of Shanghai model by consolidation test results of compressed soil is proposed. The subgrade settlement is simulated by soil-water coupled FEM software. The effect of soil structure, permeability and thickness of soft soil layer on subgrade settlement are analyzed. The results show that the stronger the initial soil structure is, the larger pore pressure and subgrade settlement are in loading stage. With the gradual destruction of soil structure after completion of construction, it is positively correlated with the amount of layer compression and soil structural parameters. The permeability affects settlement and settling time as well. The lower the permeability is, the larger total subgrade settlement and more proportion of post-construction settlement are. Thickness of the soft soil can also affect settlement and settling time. The thicker the soil layer is, the larger subgrade settlement and longer settling time are.

Key words: constitutive model, subgrade settlement, structural soft soil, consolidation history

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[3] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[7] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[8] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[9] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[10] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[11] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[12] 张超, 杨期君, 曹文贵. 考虑峰值后区应力跌落速率的 脆岩损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3099-3106.
[13] 张凌凯, 王睿, 张建民, 唐新军, . 考虑颗粒破碎效应的堆石料静动力本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2547-2554.
[14] 汪俊敏, 熊勇林, 杨骐莱, 桑琴扬, 黄强. 不饱和土动弹塑性本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2323-2331.
[15] 汪 杰, 宋卫东, 谭玉叶, 付建新, 曹 帅, . 水平分层胶结充填体损伤本构模型及强度准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1731-1739.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!