›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2025-2034.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1193

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冻土与结构接触面次峰值冻结强度试验研究

石泉彬1, 2,杨 平1,于 可1, 3,汤国毅4   

  1. 1. 南京林业大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210037;2. 泰州职业技术学院 建筑工程学院,江苏 泰州 225300; 3. 河海大学 土木与交通工程学院,江苏 南京 210037;4. 江苏南京地质工程勘察院,江苏 南京 210041
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-12 出版日期:2018-06-11 发布日期:2018-07-03
  • 通讯作者: 杨平,男,1964年生,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土与城市地下工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: yangping@njfu.edu.cn E-mail: sqb.tz@163.com
  • 作者简介:石泉彬,男,1978年生,博士研究生,副教授,主要从事环境岩土与城市地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.51278251);住房和城乡建设部科学技术计划项目(No.2017-K4-017);江苏省青蓝工程项目(苏教师[2016]15号)。

Sub peak adfreezing strength at the interface between frozen soil and structures

SHI Quan-bin1, 2, YANG Ping1, YU Ke1, 3, TANG Guo-yi4   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Taizhou Polytechnical College, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China; 4. Jiangsu Nanjing Institute of Geo-Engineering Investigation, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210041, China
  • Received:2017-06-12 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278251), the Science and Technology Program of Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2017-K4-017) and “the Qinglan Project” of Jiangsu Province (2016-15).

摘要: 为探究冻土与结构接触面次峰值冻结强度影响因素、影响规律及其预估方法,选取南京河西地铁施工区域典型粉细砂为试验土样,利用改进后的大型多功能冻土直剪仪,开展多影响因素条件下的冻结强度直剪试验研究。在对次峰值冻结强度定义和量化标准约定的基础上,研究发现极限峰值后剪应力陡降、峰后剪应力周期性变化、软化衰变等典型变化规律。将次峰值冻结强度与接触面温度、粗糙度、法向应力拟合后发现其分别呈反比例线性、二次抛物线、正比例线性关系。通过关系数据库管理软件数据挖掘,得出次峰值冻结强度关键影响因素及大小依次为接触面法向应力、粗糙度,而接触面温度为非关键影响因素。经多元非线性回归,构建了耦合接触面温度、法向应力及粗糙度三因素的次峰值冻结强度预估模型,可为人工冻土区或天然冻土区冻结加固设计、盾构法施工、地下结构物设计等提供冻结强度参数选取依据。

关键词: 次峰值冻结强度, 影响因素, 影响规律, 预估模型, 冻土, 接触面

Abstract: To study the influence factors of sub peak adfreezing strength at the interface between frozen soil and structure, the typical fine sand located in the Hexi area of Nanjing subway construction site was selected as test sample. The large-scale multi-functional frozen soil-structure interface shearing instrument was optimized and improved to conduct direct shear tests of adfreezing strength considering multi-influencing factors. Based on the specific definition and the agreement of quantitative criteria for sub peak adfreezing strength, it was found that the shear stress was typical of steepness after the limit peak, and the peak post shear stress changed periodically . The relationships among sub peak adfreezing strength, interface temperature, roughness and normal stress were fitted and found to be inverse proportional linearity, quadratic polynomial, proportional linear relationship respectively. Through the database management software, it was found that the normal stress and roughness were the key influencing factors, but the interface temperature was non-critical influencing factors. The three-element sub peak adfreezing strength prediction model coupled with interface temperature, normal stress and roughness was constructed by multivariate nonlinear regression. It can provide important adfreezing strength parameters for artificial freezing reinforcement design, shield construction and underground structure design in artificial freezing reinforcement area or permafrost area.

Key words: sub peak adfreezing strength, influential factors, influence rule, prediction model, frozen soil, interface

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 徐衍, 周晓敏, 和晓楠, 吴涛, 张建岭, 李森. 矿山竖井井壁与围岩热−固耦合作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 217-226.
[2] 张明礼, 温智, 董建华, 王得楷, 岳国栋, 王斌, 高樯. 考虑降雨作用的多年冻土区不同地表土质 活动层水热过程差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1549-1559.
[3] 胡田飞, 王天亮, 常键, 刘建勇, 卢玉婷, . 基于有限体积法的冻土水热耦合程序开发及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1781-1789.
[4] 杨军, 魏庆龙, 王亚军, 高玉兵, 侯世林, 乔博文, . 切顶卸压无煤柱自成巷顶板变形 机制及控制对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 989-998.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[7] 王青志, 房建宏, 晁刚. 高温冻土地区高等级公路片块石路基降温效果分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 305-314.
[8] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[9] 尹黎阳, 唐朝生, 谢约翰, 吕超, 蒋宁俊, 施斌, . 微生物矿化作用改善岩土材料性能的影响因素[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2525-2546.
[10] 王宏磊, 孙志忠, 刘永智, 武贵龙, . 青藏铁路含融化夹层路基热力响应监测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2815-2824.
[11] 李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[12] 张明礼, 温 智, 董建华, 王得楷, 侯彦东, 王 斌, 郭宗云, 魏浩田, . 考虑降雨作用的气温升高对多年冻土 活动层水热影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1983-1993.
[13] 李 鑫, 刘恩龙, 侯 丰, . 考虑温度影响的冻土蠕变本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 624-631.
[14] 李春红, 孔纲强, 张鑫蕊, 刘汉龙, 许晓亮, 许俊奎, . 温控桩-土接触面三轴试验系统研制与验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4955-4962.
[15] 胡明鉴, 张晨阳, 崔翔, 李焜耀, 唐健健, . 钙质砂中毛细水高度与影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4157-4164.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!