岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 684-692.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1673

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型

董建勋,刘海笑,李 洲   

  1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-09 出版日期:2019-02-11 发布日期:2019-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 刘海笑,男,1966年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事深水系泊技术和海洋岩土工程领域相关的研究。E-mail: liuhx@tju.edu.cn E-mail:1114832887@qq.com
  • 作者简介:董建勋,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土工程领域边界面塑性模型方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 51539008)

A bounding surface plasticity model of sand for cyclic loading analysis

DONG Jian-xun, LIU Hai-xiao, LI Zhou   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2017-10-09 Online:2019-02-11 Published:2019-02-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51539008).

摘要: 基于临界状态土力学框架,建立了一个适用于砂土排水循环加载的边界面塑性模型。采用了考虑虚拟峰值应力比的偏应变硬化准则,初始加载阶段应力点位于边界面上,反向加载阶段以历史最大屈服面作为边界面,同时实现了对密砂软化现象的模拟和对历史所受最大应力的记忆。边界面采用修正的椭圆形,引入考虑密度与应力水平的状态相关剪胀函数,采用非相关联流动法则和以应力反向点作为映射中心的径向映射准则。模型仅有10个参数,通过常规三轴试验即可确定,并且使用一套参数可以模拟不同围压、密度的单调和循环加载情况。分别对饱和砂土的单调、循环排水三轴试验进行模拟,结果表明,该模型能够合理地反映饱和砂土排水条件下的应力-应变特性。

关键词: 饱和砂土, 排水循环加载, 边界面模型, 偏应变硬化, 剪胀

Abstract: A bounding surface plasticity model for describing the stress-strain behavior of saturated sand subjected to drained cyclic loading is presented within a critical-state framework. A hardening rule depending on incremental deviatoric strain is adopted. During the initial loading, the stress state always locates on the bounding surface. During the unloading and reloading processes, the bounding surface is the historical maximum yielding surface. This hardening rule can describe the softening phenomena of dense sands and remember the stress history by the bounding surface. The shape of the bounding surface is a modified ellipse, which enables the model to describe the plastic strain during loading with constant stress ratio. This model incorporates state-dependent dilatancy and adopts the non-associated flow rule, so it can reasonably describe the volume change behavior of sandy soil. A mapping rule passing through stress reversal points is adopted. A single set of 10 model constants calibrated by conventional triaxial tests is needed for one type of sand under different initial void ratios and different confining pressures. The predicted results by the model for the monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests on Hostun sand, Nevada sand, Toyoura sand and Fuji River sand demonstrate that the model can reasonably describe the stress-strain characteristics of saturated sand.

Key words: saturated sand, drained cyclic loading, bounding surface model, deviatoric-strain hardening, dilatancy

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[4] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[5] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[6] 何子露, 刘威, 何思明, 闫帅星, . 饱和松散堆积体快速滑动的剪胀效应 机制与过程模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[7] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[8] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[9] 陆 勇, 周国庆, 杨冬英, 宋家庆, . 砂土剪胀软化、剪缩硬化统一本构的显式计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[10] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
[11] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 硬岩弹塑性变形破坏过程中强度参数 及剪胀角演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4401-4411.
[12] 郭莹, 刘晓东. 成样方法对饱和粉砂不同应力路径下固结 排水剪切试验结果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3783-3788.
[13] 高源, 刘海笑, 李洲, . 适用于饱和砂土循环动力分析边界面 塑性模型的显式积分算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3951-3958.
[14] 王 军, 胡惠丽, 刘飞禹, 蔡袁强, . 粒孔比对筋土界面直剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 115-122.
[15] 陈 锋, 张青庆, 姚 威, 叶良良, . 含泥盐岩的扩容特性与剪胀角模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 195-201.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!