›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1191-1196.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1808

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高庙子膨润土强度时效性试验研究

孙德安1,张乾越1,张 龙1,朱赞成2   

  1. 1. 上海大学 土木工程系,上海 200444;2. 台州学院 建筑工程学院,浙江 台州 318000
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-31 出版日期:2018-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 作者简介:孙德安,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 11672172);台州市科技计划项目(No. 1702gy09)。

Experimental study on ageing effect on shear strength of Gaomiaozi bentonite

SUN De-an1, ZHANG Qian-yue1, ZHANG Long1, ZHU Zan-cheng2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang 318000, China
  • Received:2017-08-31 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11672172) and the Taizhou Science and Technology Planning Project(1702gy09).

摘要: 本文用试验方法研究了静置时间对不同含水率高庙子钠基(GMZ07)膨润土强度的影响。在保持试样干密度和含水率不变的情况下,将初始含水率为10%、18%和24%(饱和)3组压实试样分别静置0、5、15、30、90 d,之后采用精度较高的直剪仪在400、800和1 600 kPa垂直压力下进行剪切试验;同时完成了部分试样的压汞试验。结果表明:GMZ07膨润土的剪切强度随静置时间增长而减小;静置前期,强度下降较快;静置时间超过一定天数后,其剪切强度逐渐趋于稳定。根据3种含水率试样的强度包线可得到:随着静置时间增加,饱和试样的内摩擦角略微下降而黏聚力变化不大;含水率10%和18%试样的黏聚力明显变小而内摩擦角几乎不变。根据Alonso等提出的非饱和土有效应力,结合压实膨润土试样的孔径分布,认为集聚体内孔隙增多是非饱和膨润土强度随静置时间而变小的原因。

关键词: 高庙子膨润土, 剪切强度, 时效性, 黏聚力, 内摩擦角

Abstract: The ageing effect on the shear strength of Gaomiaozi (GMZ07) bentonite with different water contents were investigated in this paper. Water contents of 10%, 18% and 24% (saturated) of compacted bentonite specimens were kept constant during curing periods of 0, 5, 15, 30 and 90 days under constant volume conditions. Then, the shear tests on the aged specimens were performed at vertical pressures of 400, 800 and 1 600 kPa by using the shear testing apparatus. At the same time, the microstructure features of the aged bentonite specimens were characterized by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) test. The test results show that the shear strength of Gaomiaozi bentonite decreases with the ageing time. The shear strength significantly decreases at the early ageing days and then tends to stabilize when the curing time is over certain days. According to the failure envelopes of three specimens with different water contents, the internal friction angles slightly reduce and the cohesion changes little for saturated specimens with the increase in curing time. For the specimens with water contents of 10% and 18%, the cohesion evidently decreases but the friction angles remain almost unchanged. According to the effective stress of unsaturated soils proposed by Alonso et al and the pore-size distribution, it is considered that the increment in the intra-aggregate pore is the reason for the decrease in the shear strength of the unsaturated bentonite with ageing time.

Key words: Gaomiaozi bentonite, shear strength, ageing effect, cohesion, internal friction angle

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[2] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[3] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[4] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[5] 张强, 李小春, 周英博, 石露, 白冰, . 高压孔隙CO2/水作用下完整四川三叠系 砂岩剪切特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3028-3036.
[6] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[7] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 卸荷损伤原状膨胀土剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4685-4692.
[8] 吉恩跃, 陈生水, 傅中志, . 掺砾心墙料拉裂力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4777-4782.
[9] 徐云山, 孙德安, 曾召田, 吕海波, . 膨润土热传导性能时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4324-4330.
[10] 杨爱武, 胡垚, 杨少坤, . 城市污泥新型固化技术及其力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4439-4449.
[11] 范 宁,年廷凯,赵 维,鲁 双,宋 雷,印 萍,. 海底泥流的流变试验及强度模型[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3195-3202.
[12] 谢敬礼,马利科,高玉峰,曹胜飞,刘月妙. 北山花岗岩岩屑-膨润土混合材料导热性能研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2823-2828.
[13] 陈 琛,冷伍明,杨 奇,金子豪,聂如松,邱 鋆,. 混凝土桩-泥皮-砂土接触面力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[14] 陈 宾,周乐意,赵延林,王智超,晁代杰,贾古宁,. 干湿循环条件下红砂岩软弱夹层微结构与剪切强度的关联性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1633-1642.
[15] 韩同春, 谢灵翔, 刘 振, . 坑中坑条件下基坑有限土体的被动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4404-4412.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!