高温循环作用后大理岩裂纹扩展试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1922

›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 220-226.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1922

高温循环作用后大理岩裂纹扩展试验研究

曾严谨^{1, 2}，荣冠^{1, 2}，彭俊^{1, 2}，沙松^{1, 2}

1. 武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430072；2. 武汉大学水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室，湖北武汉 430072

收稿日期:2017-06-16 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
通讯作者: 荣冠，男，1971年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩石力学研究与工程地质教学工作。E-mail: rg_mail@163.com E-mail:zeng-yanjin @whu.edu.cn
作者简介:曾严谨，男，1992年生，硕士研究生，主要从事岩石力学特性方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 51579189，No. 51609178，No. 41772305）；中央高校自主科研项目（No. 2042016kf0171, No. 2042016kf0042）。

Experimental study of crack propagation of marble after high temperature cycling

ZENG Yan-jin^{1, 2}, RONG Guan^{1, 2}, PENG Jun^{1, 2}, SHA Song^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China

Received:2017-06-16 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579189, 51609178, 41772305) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042016kf0171, 2042016kf0042).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用偏光显微镜对经历不同高温循环作用后的细粒大理岩进行观测，通过统计微裂纹长度、开度、数量等参数，探讨不同加热循环次数后岩样内微裂纹的扩展规律。结果表明，（1）经历不同热循环次数作用的岩样，微裂纹的数量和长度均不同，未经热处理岩样内颗粒致密，胶结较好，内部无明显的微裂纹。经历4次热循环作用后岩样内微裂纹发育明显，以晶界裂纹为主，开度和长度均显著增加。岩样经历16次热循环作用后开度持续增大，为55 µm，是4次热循环的4倍；（2）对不同热循环处理后岩样内部发育微裂纹的方向进行了统计，发现微裂纹无明显的方向性，还表明细观切片的取样位置对微裂纹的发育影响不大；（3）线性裂纹密度随热循环次数的增加而增大，经历16次热循环作用后岩样的线性裂纹密度是没有经历热处理岩样的21倍。

关键词: 大理岩, 高温循环作用, 细观切片, 热损伤微裂纹, 线性裂纹密度

Abstract: The propagation and coalescence of microcracks of a fine-grained marble after treatment under different high temperature cycles is observed and analyzed using a polarizing microscopy in this study. The thermal cracking behavior in the tested rock specimen is investigated by statistically analyzing the length, width, and quantity of the generated microcracks. The main results obtained from this study are as follows: (1) The number and the total length of thermally-induced microcracks inside the rock specimens after different numbers of thermal cycles are disparate. For specimens without thermal treatment, the grains are compacted and cemented well with each other, and no obvious microcracks are observed. With four thermal cycles’ treatment, the microcracks are generally observed in grain boundaries. The width and length are significantly increased as compared with those of specimens without thermal treatment. The width of micro-cracks in rock specimen with sixteen thermal cycles’ treatment reaches 55 μm, which is about four times as compared with that in rock specimen with four thermal cycles’ treatment. (2) The anisotropy of thermally-induced microcracks inside the rock specimens after different thermal cycles is also analyzed. The results show that there is no obvious preferred direction in the thermally-induced microcracks. It also shows that the sampling position of thin sections has negligible effect on the number of the thermally-induced microcracks. (3) The linear crack density is also found to increase as the number of thermal cycle increases. The linear crack density in rock specimen with sixteen thermal cycles’ treatment is about 21 times when compared with that of rock specimens without thermal treatment.

Key words: marble, high temperature cyclic treatment, thin section, thermally-induced microcrack, linear crack density

中图分类号:

TU 452

曾严谨，荣冠，彭俊，沙松, . 高温循环作用后大理岩裂纹扩展试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 220-226.

ZENG Yan-jin, RONG Guan, PENG Jun, SHA Song, . Experimental study of crack propagation of marble after high temperature cycling[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 220-226.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[2]	丛怡, 丛宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
[3]	张妹珠，江权，王雪亮，冯夏庭，钟山，刘畅, . 破裂大理岩锚注加固试样的三轴压缩试验及加固机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3651-3660.
[4]	张闯，唐建新，腾俊洋，李臣林.. 孔洞数量及孔径对大理岩力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 41-50.
[5]	彭帅，张希巍，冯夏庭，蔡明, . 等向压缩及偏压加载下锦屏大理岩变形特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3532-3539.
[6]	姚哨峰，张振南，葛修润，邱一平，徐金明，. 大理岩断裂能与细观结构几何特征相关性[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2341-2346.
[7]	纪维伟，潘鹏志，苏方声，杜梦萍,. 基于裂纹体应变的深埋大理岩加、卸荷破坏机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3079-3088.
[8]	刘宁，张春生，褚卫江，吴旭敏，张传庆 . 深埋大理岩力学特性对岩爆发生条件的影响分析[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2638-2642.
[9]	刘立鹏，汪小刚，贾志欣，段庆伟，张磊 . 锦屏二级水电站大理岩复杂加卸载应力路径力学特性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2287-2294.
[10]	杨凡杰，周辉，肖海斌，张传庆，张凯，杨艳霜，. 大理岩弹性参数的围压效应与弹塑性耦合模型[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1613-1620.
[11]	孙金山，陈明，姜清辉，卢文波，周创兵，. 锦屏大理岩蠕变损伤演化细观力学特征的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3601-3608.
[12]	李新平，赵航，肖桃李. 锦屏大理岩卸荷本构模型与数值模拟研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 401-407.
[13]	刘宁，张春生，褚卫江. 锦屏深埋大理岩破裂扩展的时间效应试验及特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2437-2443.
[14]	杨艳霜，周辉，张传庆，张凯，晏飞. 大理岩单轴压缩时滞性破坏的试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2714-2720.
[15]	王建秀，胡力绳，叶冲，唐益群，杨坪. 复杂应力路径下大理岩三轴渗透试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2389-2393.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

高温循环作用后大理岩裂纹扩展试验研究

Experimental study of crack propagation of marble after high temperature cycling

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0