岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1543-1550.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2109

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究

严 健1, 2,何 川1,汪 波1,蒙 伟1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-23 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 汪波,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学、科研工作。E-mail: ahbowang@163.com E-mail:sharefuture33@163.com
  • 作者简介:严健,男,1979年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事高海拔高低温隧道工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2016YFC0802201,No. 2016YFC0802210-1-1);中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划项目(No. 2017G006-B);高铁联合基金资助项目(No. U1734205);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51878571,No. 51578456);国家留学基金资助项目(No. 201707005101);广东省交通科技项目(No. 2016-02-014)。

Influence of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence in tunnel

YAN Jian1, 2, HE Chuan1, WANG Bo1, MENG Wei1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2017-10-23 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0802201, 2016YFC0802210-1-1), the Research and Development Project from China Railways Corporation (2017G006-B), the Projects Supported by the High-Speed Rail Joint Fund (U1734205), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51878571, 51578456), the Project Supported by China Scholarship Council (201707005101) and the Project of Guangdong Transportation Technology (2016-02-014).

摘要: 新建拉林铁路桑珠岭隧道高地应力、高地温隧道开挖过程中岩爆灾害突出。考虑开挖卸荷与温降共同耦合作用,对隧道开挖过程中不同温度时洞周应力释放过程进行数值模拟,同时对隧道开挖后的二次应力进行现场实测,就高地温对隧道洞周应力的影响进行了比较分析,最后就不同岩爆判据下高地温对岩爆发生的影响性进行了讨论。研究结果表明,采用应力释放率和温降指标反映开挖卸荷与温降共同耦合作用能合理描述高地应力高地温段开挖过程中的应力特征和岩爆发生规律。当温降超过55 ℃,应力释放率大于40%以后, 及 量值随应力释放率增大而线性增长,当应力释放率达到100%时达到最大,不同位置洞周应力拱脚处增长最快,拱顶次之,其他位置较低。在开挖中受高地温影响岩爆发生时间提前,岩爆发生等级亦不断增加。

关键词: 隧道工程, 高地温, 岩爆, 数值模拟, 应力释放率

Abstract: Due to the existence of high geostress and high geotemperature, the rockburst disaster is highly possible during the excavation of the newly-built Sangzhuling tunnel in the lasa-Nyingchi project. According to the unloading-temperature drop coupling action, the numerical model was conducted to simulate the stress release process during the tunnel excavation at different temperatures. At the same time, the secondary stress field was measured on site. The influence of high geotemperature on the circumferential stress was comparatively analyzed. Finally, the effect of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence was discussed by considering different criteria. The results show that the indices of stress release rate and large temperature drop are used to reflect the excavation unloading-temperature drop coupling function, which can reasonably describe stress characteristics and rockburst occurrence law under high-geostress and high geotemperature in the excavation process. When the temperature drop exceeds 55 ℃ and the stress release coefficient is greater than 40%, and linearly increase with the increase of stress release coefficient. The and achieve maximum values when the stress release rate reaches 100%. It is found that the stress at the arch foot increases fastest, following at the vault. With the increase of the stress release coefficient, the rockburst occurs earlier due to the high geotemperature, and the grade of rock burst also increases.

Key words: tunnel engineering, high geotemperature, rockburst, numerical simulation, stress release rate

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2] 陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 符启卿, 王搏, 朱新豪, 李涛, 陆菜平, 夏欢, . 综合集成高精度智能微震监测技术 及其在深部岩石工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[3] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[7] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[8] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[9] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[10] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[11] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[12] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[13] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[14] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[15] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!