岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1413-1419.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2171

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究

刘家顺1, 2,王来贵2,张向东1,李学彬3,张建俊1,任 昆1   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123009;2. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000; 3. 华北科技学院 安全工程学院,河北 廊坊 065201
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-29 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-25
  • 作者简介:刘家顺,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事土力学与地基基础方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 50978131,No. 51474121);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(No. 20112121110004);辽宁省自然科学基金指导项目(No. 20180551162)。

Cyclic triaxial test on saturated silty clay under partial drainage condition with variable confining pressure

LIU Jia-shun1, 2, WANG Lai-gui2, ZHANG Xiang-dong1, LI Xue-bin3, ZHANG Jian-jun1, REN Kun1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123009, China; 2. School of Mechanics & Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 3. College of Safety Engineering, North China Institute of Science & Technology, Langfang, Hebei 065201, China
  • Received:2017-10-29 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50978131, 51474121), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20112121110004) and Liaoning Natural Science Foundation Guidance Project (20180551162).

摘要: 围压循环变化将引起土体孔压累积,加剧土体累积塑性应变,导致地基灾变事故。为研究围压循环变化对饱和粉质黏土变形特性的影响,利用GDS双向振动三轴仪,进行部分排水时饱和粉质黏土的变围压循环三轴试验,研究不同应力路径斜率和循环动应力比时饱和粉质黏土的孔压、轴向累积塑性应变和体应变发展规律,建立部分排水条件时考虑循环围压和循环动应力耦合作用的地基粉质黏土累积应变数学模型。试验结果表明:部分排水时饱和粉质黏土孔压、轴向累积塑性应变和体应变均随循环动应力比和应力路径斜率的增大而增大;动孔压比随着振动次数的增加明显分为急剧增加、快速下降和持续平稳3个阶段;轴向累积塑性应变和体应变均随振动次数的增加而增大。当加载次数超过2 500次时,粉质黏土孔压趋于平稳,变形速率略有降低,但变形持续增加。补充试验结果表明,所建立模型与试验结果具有较高的一致性。研究结果将为交通循环荷载导致的地基灾变控制技术提供理论依据。

关键词: 土力学, 变围压, 饱和粉质黏土, 轴向累积塑性应变, 应力路径斜率, 循环动应力比

Abstract: The varying cyclic confined pressures will aggravate the pore water pressure and the accumulated plastic strain of soil and even lead to the catastrophic accident. The triaxial tests with cyclic confining pressure were carried out to study the pore pressure, the axial cumulative plastic strain and the volumetric strain of saturated silty clay under different stress paths and cyclic dynamic stress ratios by using GDS triaxial apparatus under partial drained conditions. A mathematical model of accumulated strain for silty clay under cyclic confining pressure and cyclic dynamic stress was established under partial drainage conditions. The experimental results show that the pore water pressure, axial cumulative plastic strain and volumetric strain of the saturated silty clay increase as the cyclic dynamic stress ratio and the stress path slope increases. The dynamic pore pressure ratio versus vibration number curves divided into three stages: rapid increase stage, rapid decline stage and sustained stability stage, respectively. The axial cumulative plastic strain and volumetric strain increase as the vibration number increases. The pore pressure of silty clay tends to be stable, while the deformation rate decreases slightly, but the deformation increases continuously when the number of loading is more than 2 500 times. The supplementary experimental results show that the established model is in good agreement with the experimental results. The results will provide a theoretical basis for the foundation disaster control technology caused by traffic cycle load.

Key words: soil mechanics, variable confining pressure, saturated silty clay, axial cumulative plastic strain, stress path ratio, cyclic dynamic stress ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土 渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[2] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[3] 王丽琴, 邵生俊, 王 帅, 赵 聪, 石鹏鑫, 周 彪, . 原状黄土的压缩曲线特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1076-1084.
[4] 王丽琴,邵生俊,赵 聪,鹿忠刚,. 黄土初始结构性对其压缩屈服的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3223-3228.
[5] 丑亚玲,郏书胜,张庆海,曹 伟,盛 煜,. 考虑结构性的冻融作用对黄土湿陷系数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2715-2722.
[6] 刘家顺,张向东,孙嘉宝,杨建军,方天健. 主应力轴旋转下K0固结饱和粉质黏土孔压及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2787-2794.
[7] 陈乐求,张家生,陈俊桦,陈积光,. 水泥改良泥质板岩粗粒土的静动力特性试验[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1903-1910.
[8] 浦少云,饶军应,杨凯强,黄质宏,李永辉,陈泽南,李 勤,刘汉卿,. 循环荷载下土体变形特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3261-3270.
[9] 马冬冬,马芹永,袁 璞,姚兆明, . 主动围压状态人工冻结砂土SHPB试验与分析[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2957-2961.
[10] 刘忠玉,陈 捷,李东阳,. 考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2443-2450.
[11] 何春灿 ,胡新丽 ,龚 辉 ,谭福林 ,章 涵 ,张小勇,. 基于软硬石模板库的土石混合体细观损伤与力学特性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2993-3002.
[12] 蒋中明 ,龙 芳 ,熊小虎 ,冯树荣 ,钟辉亚,. 边坡稳定性分析中的渗透力计算方法考证[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2478-2486.
[13] 王仕传,孙本杰,邵 艳. 改进的主动土压力计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1375-1379.
[14] 梅 源 ,胡长明 ,魏弋峰 ,张文萃 ,袁一力 ,王雪艳 , . Q2、Q3黄土深堑中高填方地基变形规律离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3473-3481.
[15] 刘晓磊 ,贾永刚 ,郑杰文,. 波浪导致黄河口海床沉积物超孔压响应现场试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3055-3062.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!