岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1307-1312.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2193

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉土中筒型基础贯入阻力的研究

马文冠,刘 润,练继建,郭绍曾   

  1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-01 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-24
  • 通讯作者: 刘润,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事海洋结构物地基基础方面的研究。E-mail: liurun@tju.edu.cn E-mail: 471807124@qq.com
  • 作者简介:马文冠,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事海上风电筒型基础沉贯特性方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家杰出青年科学基金(No. 51825904);创新方法工作专项(No. 2016IM030100)

The study of penetration resistance of bucket foundation in silt

MA Wen-guan, LIU Run, LIAN Ji-jian, GUO Shao-zeng   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2017-11-01 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-24
  • Supported by:
    This work were supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51825904) and the Innovation Method Fund of China (2016IM030100).

摘要: 筒型基础在海洋工程中应用广泛,贯入阻力的准确计算是筒型基础成功应用的关键。在海洋工程中,粉土是介于砂土与黏土间的特殊土,现有计算方法中将粉土等同于砂土,忽略了黏聚力c对贯入阻力的影响。开展了粉土中筒型基础的现场贯入试验,观测了自重下沉阶段与负压贯入阶段筒型基础贯入阻力与贯入深度的关系,提出了粉土中计算沉贯阻力的方法,并对不同筒端形式的减阻效果进行了深入分析。研究结果表明,采用现有规范方法计算粉土中筒型基础的贯入阻力值较实测值偏小20%,提出的两种方法不仅适用于计算粉土中筒型基础的贯入阻力,而且能够反映负压贯入阶段的减阻效果;尖筒端可使筒端阻力减少50%,减阻环可使筒侧摩阻力减少50%,但减阻环会破坏筒壁周围土体,形成渗流通道,导致负压失效。

关键词: 筒型基础, 粉土, 沉贯阻力, 计算方法, 减阻环

Abstract: Bucket foundations are widely used in ocean engineering. The determination of the penetration resistance is a key to the successful application of this type of foundation. In ocean engineering, the properties of silt is largely different from sand and clay. But the existing calculation method of penetration resistance of bucket foundation is generally for sandy soil, which neglects the influence of the cohesion c on the penetration resistance. In this paper, three bucket foundations with different types of tip are penetrated by dead-weight and suction pressure. The relations between penetration resistance and penetration depth are measured in the different penetration stages by dead-weight and by suction. Two methods for calculating the penetration resistance of bucket foundation in silt were derived. The effect of drag reduction in different tips were analyzed. Studies have shown that the calculation value of the penetration resistance of bucket foundation by specification in slit is 20% smaller than measured value. Two methods proposed in this paper that can not only accurately calculate the penetration resistance, but also can reflect the drag reduction effect caused by suction. The sharp-tip can reduce the half of the tip resistance and the anti-drag ring reduce the half friction resistance. However, the anti-drag ring will destroy the soil around the wall and formed a seepage channel, which fail to provide the penetration force.

Key words: bucket foundation, silt, penetration resistance, calculation method, anti-drag ring

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[2] 邓涛, 林聪煜, 柳志鹏, 黄明, 陈文菁, . 大位移条件下水平受荷单桩的简明弹塑性计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[3] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[4] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[5] 李瑞山, 袁晓铭. 成层场地基本周期简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3227-3235.
[6] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[7] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[8] 朱 宁,周 洋,刘 维,史培新,吴 奔, . 苏州粉土地层地连墙施工对地层扰动影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 529-536.
[9] 丁红岩,贾 楠,张浦阳, . 砂土中筒型基础沉放过程渗流特性和沉贯阻力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3130-3138.
[10] 张 德,刘恩龙,刘星炎,宋丙堂, . 冻结粉土强度准则探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3237-3245.
[11] 柳晓科,鹿 群,路士伟,刘春龙,郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[12] 周正龙,陈国兴,赵 凯,吴 琪,马维嘉. 循环加载方向角对饱和粉土不排水动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 36-44.
[13] 祁 越,刘 润,练继建,. 无黏性土中筒型基础负压下沉模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 139-150.
[14] 金亚兵. 地连墙槽壁加固深度和宽度计算方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 273-278.
[15] 金亚兵. 地连墙槽壁加固稳定性计算方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 305-312.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!