岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1535-1542.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2273

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法

信亚雯1,周志芳1,马 筠1,李鸣威1,陈 朦1,汪 姗2,胡尊乐2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210098;2. 江苏省水文水资源勘测局常州分局 站网科,江苏 常州 213022
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-14 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 周志芳,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事水文地质方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhouzf@hhu.edu.cn E-mail:yawenxin@hhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:信亚雯,女,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下水资源方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41572209);国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2016YFC0402803)。

A method for determining aquitard hydraulic parameters based on double-tube field test

XIN Ya-wen1, ZHOU Zhi-fang1, MA Jun1, LI Ming-wei1, CHEN Meng1, WANG Shan2, HU Zun-yue2   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Station Network Department, Changzhou Branch of Jiangsu Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213022, China
  • Received:2017-11-14 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572209) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0402803).

摘要: 弱透水层水力参数对基础工程设计、建设和地下水资源评价、地下水污染预测具有重要意义。现提出一种现场确定含水层系统中弱透水层水力参数的钻孔双管试验方法。利用麻花钻钻孔,到达地下水位线以下揭露到目的层位后布设外管,以起到护壁防止土层塌孔的作用。在外管内通过锤击的方式将内管嵌入到目的层中,使其下部管中有一定厚度的土样作为现场固定试验土柱。待内外管中地下水位稳定后迅速加高内管水头,并通过马里奥特瓶装置保持定水头。建立钻孔双管试验土柱的数学模型,推导了土柱顶底面单位面积流量随时间变化的解析解,将其无量纲化后作出标准曲线。作为该方法应用的实例,在长江下游三角洲苏锡常冲积平原的常州天宁区德安医院附近的空旷场地进行了专门的钻孔试验。确定了该地区的细砂质粉土和粉质黏土的渗透系数和贮水率分别为:K=1.66×10?6 m/s,?s =8.21×10?3 m?1;K=6.06×10?7 m/s,?s =2.26×10?3 m?1。结果表明,该方法对于现场确定弱透水层的水力参数有较好的适用性。

关键词: 现场试验, 钻孔双管试验, 弱透水层, 水力参数, 解析解

Abstract: The aquitard hydraulic parameters are important for basic engineering design, construction, groundwater resource evaluation and groundwater pollution prediction. A new method of borehole double-tube test is proposed to estimate the hydraulic parameters of aquitard in aquifer system, including vertical hydraulic conductivity K and specific storage μs. The drill pipe is drilled below the water level line by auger drill, and the outer pipe is laid after the target layer is exposed, so as to protect the wall and prevent the collapse of the soil layer. In the outer pipe, the inner pipe is embedded into the target layer by hammering, and the soil sample with a certain thickness in the inner pipe is used as the fixed soil column in the field test. Then the water is injected into the inner pipe rapidly when the groundwater level in the inner and outer pipe is stable, at the same time, and the fixed head is maintained through the Mariot bottle device. A mathematical model of soil column in borehole double-tube test is established, and the analytical solution of unit area flow rate of top and bottom of soil column with time is deduced. The dimensionless analytical solution is derived and the standard curve is obtained. As an example of the application for this method, a special borehole test was carried out in the open field near De'an Hospital, Tianning District, Changzhou, in the alluvial plain of Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou, the lower Yangtze River Delta. The hydraulic conductivity and the specific storage of fine sandy silt and silty clay in this area are determined as follows: K=1.66×10?6 m/s, ?s =8.21×10?3 m?1;K=6.06×10?7 m/s, ?s =2.26×10?3 m?1, respectively, which demonstrates that the method has good applicability for determining the hydraulic parameters of aquitard in the field.

Key words: field test, double-tube test for drilling, aquitard, hydraulic parameters, analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[4] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[5] 刘国钊, 乔亚飞, 何满潮, 樊勇, . 活动性断裂带错动下隧道纵向响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 923-932.
[6] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[7] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[8] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[9] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[10] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[11] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[12] 夏才初, 刘宇鹏, 吴福宝, 徐 晨, 邓云纲, . 基于西原模型的圆形隧道黏弹-黏塑性解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1638-1648.
[13] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[14] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[15] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!