岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 91-98.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2275

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于岩石破坏全过程能量特征改进的能量跌落系数

宋洪强1,左建平1, 2,陈 岩1,黎立云1,洪紫杰1   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083; 2. 中国矿业大学(北京)煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-14 出版日期:2019-01-11 发布日期:2019-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 左建平,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事裂隙煤岩破坏及本构理论研究。E-mail: zjp@cumtb.edu.cn E-mail:shqmfyx@163.com
  • 作者简介:宋洪强,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学方面的科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(No. 51622404);国家自然科学基金(No. 11572343);“十三五”国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0801404);“万人计划”青年拔尖人才联合资助项目(No. W02070044)。

Revised energy drop coefficient based on energy characteristics in whole process of rock failure

SONG Hong-qiang1, ZUO Jian-ping1, 2, CHEN Yan1, LI Li-yun1, HONG Zi-jie1   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics & Civil Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2017-11-14 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Outstanding Youth Scholars (51622404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572343), the National Key Research and Development Program of China During 13th Five Year Plan (2016YFC0801404) and the Outstanding Young Talents of “Ten Thousand People Plan” (W02070044).

摘要: 合理而准确地评价岩石的脆性是评估岩爆风险、油气储层可压裂性等工程实践的前提。针对表征脆性岩石破坏过程的能量跌落系数,详细分析了其适用性和局限性。为更加有效地评价岩石的脆性,基于岩石破坏全过程的应力-应变曲线,在能量跌落系数的基础上,进一步考虑峰前总能量中可释放弹性能的占比,提出一种改进的能量跌落系数,认为脆性是岩石内部可释放弹性能在峰前阶段大量储存并于峰后阶段快速释放的综合表现。通过对不同围压下大理岩和花岗岩试验数据进行分析和对比,结果表明改进后的能量跌落系数不仅能反映同种岩石不同围压下的脆-延转化行为,还能有效评价相同围压下不同岩石的脆性强弱。同时讨论了泊松比、损伤变量对岩石脆性评价的影响,发现随着泊松比增大,各围压下花岗岩的脆性强于大理岩的性质不改变;随着损伤变量增大,花岗岩的脆性由强于大理岩转变为弱于大理岩,且围压越高,现象越明显。试验结果验证了改进后能量跌落系数的可靠性,研究成果有望对岩石脆性评价提供参考。

关键词: 岩石力学, 脆性评价, 能量跌落系数, 应力-应变曲线, 能量特征, 损伤变量

Abstract: Reasonable and accurate evaluation of rock brittleness is the precondition of engineering practices, such as the assessment of rock burst risk and fracturing of oil and gas reservoir. In this paper, the applicability and limitation of energy drop coefficient for characterizing the failure process of brittle rock are analyzed in detail. In order to evaluate the brittleness of rocks more effectively, based on the stress-strain curve of the whole process of rock failure and the energy drop coefficient, a revised energy drop coefficient is developed by considering the ratio of released elastic energy in the total energy of the pre-peak stage. It is considered that brittleness is a comprehensive manifestation of releasable elastic energy stored in large quantities in the pre-peak stage and released rapidly in the post-peak stage. The experimental data of marble and granite under different confining pressures are analyzed and compared. It is found that the revised energy drop coefficient can not only reflect the brittle-ductile behavior of same rock under different confining pressures, but also effectively evaluate the degree of brittleness of different rocks under same confining pressure. In addition, the influences of Poisson’s ratio and damage variable on rock brittleness evaluation are discussed, the brittleness of granite is found greater than that of marble under each confining pressure with the increase of Poisson’s ratio; and with the increase of damage variable, the brittleness of granite is firstly greater than that of marble and then less than. The test results verify the reliability of revised energy drop coefficient, which may be expected to provide some references for rock brittleness evaluation.

Key words: rock mechanics, brittleness evaluation, energy drop coefficient, stress-strain curve, energy characteristics, damage variable

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[4] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[5] 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, 许江, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 严召松, . 3D-DIC系统在岩石力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3263-3273.
[6] 张艳博, 梁鹏, 孙林, 田宝柱, 姚旭龙, 刘祥鑫, . 单轴压缩下饱水花岗岩破裂过程声发射 频谱特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2497-2506.
[7] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[8] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[9] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[10] 苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[11] 王 宇, 艾 芊, 李建林, 邓华锋, . 考虑不同影响因素的砂岩损伤特征 及其卸荷破坏细观特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1341-1350.
[12] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[13] 李晓照, 戚承志, 邵珠山, 屈小磊, . 基于细观力学脆性岩石剪切特性演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1358-1367.
[14] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 雷 江, 于洪丹, 邢天海, 郑有雷, 贾晓东, . 并联型软岩温度-渗流-应力耦合三轴流变仪的研制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1213-1220.
[15] 郑广辉, 许金余, 王 鹏, 方新宇, 王佩玺, 闻 名, . 冻融循环作用下层理砂岩物理特性及劣化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 632-641.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!