微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2376

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1263-1272.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2376

微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究

庄海洋¹，付继赛¹，陈苏²，陈国兴¹，王雪剑¹

1. 南京工业大学岩土工程研究所，江苏南京 210009；2. 中国地震局地球物理研究所，北京 100081

收稿日期:2017-11-28 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-22
作者简介:庄海洋，男，1978年生，博士，教授，主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51778290)；国家自然科学基金青年项目(No. 51508526)；江苏省高校自然科学基金重大项目(No. 16KJA560001)。

Liquefaction and deformation of the soil foundation around a subway underground structure with a slight inclined ground surface by the shaking table test

ZHUANG Hai-yang¹, FU Ji-sai¹, CHEN Su², CHEN Guo-xing¹, WANG Xue-jian¹

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2017-11-28 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-22
Supported by:
This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778290), the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (51508526) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (16KJA560001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 强震中场地砂土液化产生的土层侧移对地面建筑结构和地下生命线工程造成了严重的破坏。可以预见，微倾斜液化场地的土层侧移也将对地铁地下结构的地震安全造成严重的威胁。鉴于此，开展了微倾斜（倾角为6o）可液化场地中两层三跨地铁地下车站结构与区间隧道连接部位地震反应的大型振动台模型试验研究。结果表明：微倾斜可液化场地中地铁车站结构两侧地基出现了明显的非对称液化分布特征，坡体下方水平土层比上方水平土层更易液化；因坡体内土体液化沿坡向下流滑引起了下方水平土层发生了明显的地面抬升，总体上坡体段内的地面侧移量最大，下方水平土层地面侧移量次之，坡体上方水平土层地面侧移量最小。同时，在试验过程中也发现，隧道和车站结构之间发生了明显的差异上浮，可能会造成连接部位附近结构的应力集中或加重该部位的地震破坏。

关键词: 微倾斜场地, 砂土液化, 土层侧移, 地铁地下结构, 振动台模型试验

Abstract: In a strong earthquake, the liquefaction-induced lateral deformation of ground has induced severe damages to the ground structures and the underground lifeline engineering. It is foreseeable that the safety of subway underground structure is seriously threatened by the seismic liquefaction-induced lateral deformation of ground. For this reason, the earthquake response of a subway underground structure buried in a soil foundation with a slight inclined ground surface was investigated by shaking table tests. The results demonstrated that the soils beside the underground structure were not liquefied synchronously with the soils near the slope toe were easier to be liquefied than the soils near the slope top. When the soils in the slope was liquefied, they would flow down along the slope, which can induce the uplift of the ground surface near the slope toe. Meanwhile, it was found that the lateral deformation of soil in the slope was larger than that of soil near the slope toe, and the lateral deformation of soil near the slope top was smallest. The results also revealed that the underground subway station floated more severely than that of connected tunnel, which could induce seismic damage at the connection part between the tunnel and subway station.

Key words: slight inclined ground, sand liquefaction, lateral deformation of soil, subway underground structure, shaking table test

中图分类号:

TU 432

庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.

ZHUANG Hai-yang, FU Ji-sai, CHEN Su, CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Xue-jian, . Liquefaction and deformation of the soil foundation around a subway underground structure with a slight inclined ground surface by the shaking table test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[2]	魏星, 张昭, 王刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[3]	徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, 高泽飞, 王智猛, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[4]	张春生, 赖道平, 吴关叶, 徐建荣, 张伯艳, . 强震作用下复杂边坡块体破坏模式和破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4620-4626.
[5]	雷达, 蒋关鲁, 孙圣杰, 戚志慧, 李安洪, . 基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 127-134.
[6]	许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 高畄成, 陈苏, 杜修力, . 地震动持时压缩比对可液化地基地震反应影响的振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 147-155.
[7]	孙志亮，孔令伟，郭爱国. 不同含水状态堆积体边坡地震响应特性大型振动台模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2433-2441.
[8]	付海清，袁晓铭，王淼，. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618.
[9]	宫凤强，李嘉维,. 基于PCA-DDA原理的砂土液化预测模型及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 448-454.
[10]	陈国兴，陈苏，左熹，戚承志，杜修力，王志华 , . 软土场地地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台模型试验[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 331-342.
[11]	陈苏，陈国兴，戚承志，杜修力，王志华 , . 可液化场地上三拱立柱式地铁地下车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1899-1914.
[12]	孙志亮，孔令伟，郭爱国，田海. 地震作用下堆积体边坡的坡面变形与失稳机制[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3465-3472.
[13]	王良民，叶剑红，朱长歧. 近海欠密实砂质海床内波致渐进液化特征研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3583-3588.
[14]	陶连金，侯森，赵旭，仇文革，郭飞，李书龙. 不同仰坡度数的山岭隧道洞口段动力响应振动台试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 91-98.
[15]	吴冬，高波，申玉生，周佳媚. 隧道仰坡地震动力响应特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1921-1928.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究

Liquefaction and deformation of the soil foundation around a subway underground structure with a slight inclined ground surface by the shaking table test

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0