岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 1067-1075.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2512

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

正断层诱发砂土中群桩基础破坏及避让距离研究

蔡奇鹏1,甘港璐1,吴宏伟2,陈星欣1,肖朝昀1   

  1. 1. 华侨大学 土木工程学院,福建 厦门 361021;2. 香港科技大学 土木与环境工程系,香港
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-08 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-04
  • 作者简介:蔡奇鹏,男,1982年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51778249);华侨大学中青年教师科研提升资助计划(No.ZQN-PY216);福建省自然科学基金项目 (No.2018J01072)。

Study on failure mechanism and setback distance of a pile group in sand subjected to normal faulting

CAI Qi-peng1, GAN Gang-lu1, NG C. W. W.2, CHEN Xing-xin1, XIAO Zhao-yun1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
  • Received:2017-12-08 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778249), the Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University (ZQN-PY216) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2018J01072).

摘要: 地震中发震断层诱发桩基失效,导致上部结构破坏甚至坍塌,相关破坏机制和避让距离缺乏系统研究。通过离心机试验和数值模拟,针对基岩正断层活动诱发上覆砂土中群桩基础的静力破坏展开研究,考察不同群桩断层相对位置下群桩的破坏特征。试验与计算结果均表明,当群桩跨越断层时,正断层活动使群桩向上盘一侧倾斜,并使基桩弯向上盘一侧。基桩桩顶荷载的重分布进一步使基桩形成受拉和受压两种破坏模式。数值参数分析表明,在不同桩位上,群桩的变形响应可划分为5个特征区域。对于埋深为20.0 m的基岩正断层,群桩在上盘和下盘一侧的安全避让距离分别为23.5 m和15.9 m,其中下盘一侧离开断层7.9 m至上盘一侧离开断层4.1 m的区域需要进行重点避让。

关键词: 土工离心机, 数值模拟, 正断层, 群桩, 避让距离

Abstract: Pile foundation could be severely damaged by active fault during an earthquake, resulting damage and even collapse of superstructures. The pile failure mechanism and setback distance are not yet investigated systematically. Centrifuge and numerical modeling of pile group foundation in sand subjected to normal faulting were conducted. The influences of pile location relative to the bedrock fault on failure mechanism of pile group were investigated. Centrifuge and numerical results consistently show that when the pile group crosses the bedrock fault, the pile tilts to the hanging wall after faulting and is also bent to the hanging wall. Loading redistribution between piles results in two different failure patterns of tension and compression. Numerical parametric study of pile locations show that five characteristic zones could be classified based on different pile responses. For a soil stratum with thickness of 20.0 m, the setback distances of pile group at the side of footwall and hanging wall are 15.9 m and 23.5 m, respectively. The area within 7.9 m to the fault line at the footwall and 4.1 m to the fault line at the hanging wall is the most critical setback zone.

Key words: geotechnical centrifuge, numerical modeling, normal fault, pile group, setback distance

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43
[1] 范怡飞, 王建华, . 考虑桩靴贯入对邻近群桩效应影响的分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2360-2368.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[4] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[5] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[6] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[7] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[8] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[9] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[10] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[11] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[12] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[13] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[14] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[15] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!