›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 79-88.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2530

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

加载速率对砂岩抗拉强度的影响机制

邓华锋,王晨玺杰,李建林,张吟钗,王 伟,张恒宾   

  1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-20 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:邓华锋,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    湖北省自然科学基金重点项目(No. 2015CFA140);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51679127);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 51439003)。

Influence mechanism of loading rate on tensile strength of sandstone

DENG Hua-feng, WANG Chen-xi-jie, LI Jian-lin, ZHANG Yin-chai, WANG Wei, ZHANG Heng-bin   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2017-12-20 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2015CFA140) , the National Natural Science foundation of China(51679127) , and the National Nature Science foundation of China(51439003).

摘要: 为研究加载速率对砂岩抗拉强度的影响效应及影响机制,设计开展5种加载速率的劈裂试验,综合分析抗拉强度、破坏特征、能量参数和劈裂面微观形貌变化规律及相关性。结果表明,(1) 随着加载速率增大,砂岩劈裂抗拉强度逐渐增大,总体呈现先陡后缓的趋势,加载速率在0.01~0.10 kN/s范围内时抗拉强度增长迅速,0.10~1.00 kN/s范围内时抗拉强度增长趋势渐缓;(2) 随着加载速率的增大,岩样吸收的总能量增大,弹性应变能占总能量的比值逐渐增大,耗散能占总能量的比值逐渐减小,加载至破坏时裂纹扩展形成宏观劈裂面的时间呈数量级减小,达到峰值应力时弹性应变能的释放,导致岩样破坏的突发性增强,使得劈裂面形貌特征在宏观和微观上逐渐变得复杂,对应抗拉强度逐渐增大;(3) 在岩石劈裂试验过程中加载速率、能量参数、劈裂面形貌特征与抗拉强度密切相关,加载速率影响加载过程中能量的总量与分配,能量参数的变化直接影响岩样的破坏过程及劈裂面的形貌特征,最后宏观上表现为抗拉强度的差异。文中相关分析方法和思路可为类似试验提供较好的参考。

关键词: 加载速率, 劈裂, 微观形貌, 高度特征参数, 纹理特征参数, 能量

Abstract: In order to study how the tensile strength of sandstone influenced by loading rate, a series of splitting tests are carried out with five loading rates. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the splitting tensile strength, destructive features, the change rule and correlation between microstructure of the splitting surface and energy parameters, the results show that: (1) The split tensile strength of sandstone gradually decrease as loading rate increase, and generally go slow after the first steep upward trend. When loading rate is between 0.01 kN/s to 0.10 kN/s, the tensile strength grew significantly and then tended to slow down at 0.1 kN/s to 1.00 kN/s. (2) Total energy the sample absorbed increase as loading rate increase, and the ratio of elastic strain energy to total energy increases while dissipated energy go down, the time when the crack propagation formed into splitting surface is an order of magnitude less, which indicates the sudden destruction of rock sample enhanced resulted by release of elastic strain energy when peak stress reached, which result in tensile strength enhanced and increasingly complicated micro morphology characteristics. (3) During the rock splitting test, loading rate, energy parameter, features of splitting surface and tensile strength are closely related; first of all, the loading rate affects the total amount and distribution of energy ,and the changes in energy parameters affects its destruction process and features of splitting surface; finally, the difference in tensile strength shows. The related analysis methods and ideas references can provide a better reference for similar tests.

Key words: loading rate, splitting, microstructure, height feature parameters, texture feature parameters, energy

中图分类号: 

  • TU452

[1] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[4] 陈光波, 秦忠诚, 张国华, 李谭, 李敬凯, . 受载煤岩组合体破坏前能量分布规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2021-2033.
[5] 胡盛斌, 杜国平, 徐国元, 周天忠, 钟有信, 石重庆, . 基于能量测量的声呐渗流矢量法及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2143-2154.
[6] 张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 马亚丽娜, 周光新. 岩石材料抗拉强度与劈裂节理面形貌的 加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
[7] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[8] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[9] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[10] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[11] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[12] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[13] 许婧璟, 唐旭海, 刘泉声, 冯禹菲. 基于能量跟踪法研究岩石破碎 对滚石运动轨迹的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 541-548.
[14] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[15] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!